![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
December 20, 2013, 12:33:29 AM |
|
If there are even only as many as three scrypt based coins at least one of them is going to end up with less than 50% of the total amount of scrypt hashing power the world is able to deploy, so at least one of them will be a pointless pile of crap serving mostly as a sucker trap for criminals to use to sucker idiots into using a currency that can be 50+% attacked.
So if two scrypt coins already exist - which I think they do, right? - its pretty stupid, or criminally negligent, or a conspiracy to defraud by misrepresenting the dangers or security, or, in general, basically a scam, to try to get people to throw their wealth into a blockchain you will never be able to adequately secure...
Instead of asking what new coins are coming next, you should be asking whether any already existing have not yet been trashed by 50+% attacks and if so which such one will be the next one to be forked or doublespent etc...
-MarkM-
|