cr1776 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4060
Merit: 1303
|
|
December 23, 2013, 05:24:02 PM Last edit: December 23, 2013, 05:56:23 PM by cr1776 |
|
From the New York Post: http://nypost.com/2013/12/23/government-robbed-me-of-33m-in-bitcoins-silk-road-pirate/The Internet “pirate” accused of running the notorious illegal-drug-peddling Web site Silk Road claims that the feds are the real buccaneers — robbing him to the tune of $33.6 million worth of the encrypted, virtual currency bitcoin.
Ross Ulbricht — who was arrested in October for allegedly masterminding the mysterious “deep Web” site — recently filed legal papers in Manhattan federal court admitting he “has an interest as owner” of the more than 173,000 bitcoins the government seized through forfeiture from Silk Road. ...
|
|
|
|
TraderTimm
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2408
Merit: 1121
|
|
December 23, 2013, 06:43:52 PM |
|
Indirectly he's delaying his own verdict by doing this, I suppose. Unless they just throw it out and get on with the main issue at hand. Like everyone else, I want to know how they go about auctioning them off -- if they even do it, that is. There may be growing incentive to hold on to them for other reasons...
|
fortitudinem multis - catenum regit omnia
|
|
|
Bitco
|
|
December 23, 2013, 08:48:25 PM |
|
This is rather unusual. When the feds seize alleged drug money, claiming that it's yours usually isn't a good strategy.
Anyone have a copy of the actual filing?
|
|
|
|
kjlimo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2114
Merit: 1031
|
|
December 24, 2013, 04:52:15 AM |
|
Well at least we'll get more judges talking about bitcoins...
|
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2634
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
December 24, 2013, 12:46:59 PM |
|
This is rather unusual. When the feds seize alleged drug money, claiming that it's yours usually isn't a good strategy.
Ha, that's what I thought.
|
|
|
|
LiteCoinGuy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1010
In Satoshi I Trust
|
|
December 24, 2013, 03:25:47 PM |
|
of course he will get his money back..... NOT
|
|
|
|
cr1776 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4060
Merit: 1303
|
|
December 24, 2013, 03:35:49 PM |
|
I agree, the odds of a Federal Judge giving him the bitcoins back is very, very, low. I think he is fighting for himself and crypto-currencies too. Questions are:
1. Will they force him to disclose any private keys he hasn't disclosed? 2. How will the classify bitcoin? 3. What will become of it? Auction? Ignored?
...
|
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2634
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
December 24, 2013, 03:39:27 PM |
|
I agree, the odds of a Federal Judge giving him the bitcoins back is very, very, low. I think he is fighting for himself and crypto-currencies too. Questions are:
1. Will they force him to disclose any private keys he hasn't disclosed? 2. How will the classify bitcoin? 3. What will become of it? Auction? Ignored?
...
1) How will they force him? They might try give him a longer sentence perhaps, but I don't think they're gonna torture them out of him. 2) I think they classify them as assets or just seized funds. 3) The feds have said they're gonna liquidate them. How, I do not know, but I hope they don't dump them all at market at once.
|
|
|
|
jzcjca00
|
|
December 24, 2013, 03:46:06 PM |
|
Reminds me if what O.J. said right after his trial, "So can I get my gloves back now?"
|
Tips much appreciated! 1PPJHDawPvjh6MEzsvXrMYLgpLmyAaNXUc
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3682
Merit: 1217
|
|
December 25, 2013, 02:32:21 PM |
|
This is stupidity, isn't it? If he claims that the coins are his own, then he is indirectly admitting that he ran SR 1.0 as an owner. Else, if the Feds ask him how he came to the possession of so many coins, what will be his answer?
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 25, 2013, 04:15:17 PM |
|
Maybe the evidence against him is strong enough that his best bet is to try to recover the Bitcoins to pay for the best defense he can get. Admit guilt, try to get the lowest possible sentence. Might make sense if the situation were desperate and no decent bargain was on the table for an outright confession. And it certainly does look like a pretty desperate situation for Ulbricht...
|
Selling out to advertisers shows you respect neither yourself nor the rest of us. --------------------------------------------------------------- Too many low-quality posts? Mods not keeping things clean enough? Self-moderated threads let you keep signature spammers and trolls out!
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3682
Merit: 1217
|
|
December 25, 2013, 04:20:29 PM |
|
Maybe the evidence against him is strong enough that his best bet is to try to recover the Bitcoins to pay for the best defense he can get. Admit guilt, try to get the lowest possible sentence. Might make sense if the situation were desperate and no decent bargain was on the table for an outright confession. And it certainly does look like a pretty desperate situation for Ulbricht...
1. Even if he claims that the BTCs are his own, he will not get them as they are currently seized as a part of the investigation. Plus, it was accumulated through illegal activities. 2. The lowest possible sentence here seems to be life without parole. Then why bother with a confession?
|
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2634
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
December 25, 2013, 04:27:03 PM |
|
Maybe the evidence against him is strong enough that his best bet is to try to recover the Bitcoins to pay for the best defense he can get. Admit guilt, try to get the lowest possible sentence. Might make sense if the situation were desperate and no decent bargain was on the table for an outright confession. And it certainly does look like a pretty desperate situation for Ulbricht...
1. Even if he claims that the BTCs are his own, he will not get them as they are currently seized as a part of the investigation. Plus, it was accumulated through illegal activities. 2. The lowest possible sentence here seems to be life without parole. Then why bother with a confession? I'm sure there must be some logic/reasoning as to why he's filing a suit to reclaim them. When does his trial start?
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 25, 2013, 05:12:28 PM |
|
Maybe the evidence against him is strong enough that his best bet is to try to recover the Bitcoins to pay for the best defense he can get. Admit guilt, try to get the lowest possible sentence. Might make sense if the situation were desperate and no decent bargain was on the table for an outright confession. And it certainly does look like a pretty desperate situation for Ulbricht...
1. Even if he claims that the BTCs are his own, he will not get them as they are currently seized as a part of the investigation. Plus, it was accumulated through illegal activities. 2. The lowest possible sentence here seems to be life without parole. Then why bother with a confession? He's contending the coins weren't legally subject to seizure. If that seems like a very thin straw to hang on to, maybe that's all he's got right now.
|
Selling out to advertisers shows you respect neither yourself nor the rest of us. --------------------------------------------------------------- Too many low-quality posts? Mods not keeping things clean enough? Self-moderated threads let you keep signature spammers and trolls out!
|
|
|
cdog
|
|
December 26, 2013, 06:13:04 AM |
|
They are encrypted in a wallet which Im sure he has backed up and waiting for his release, why would he admit to owning them? It cant help his criminal case. Im baffled...
|
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2634
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
December 26, 2013, 11:13:55 AM |
|
They are encrypted in a wallet which Im sure he has backed up and waiting for his release, why would he admit to owning them? It cant help his criminal case. Im baffled...
Are you sure they're safe and encrypted? If he had back-ups why would he bother suing? I'm sure the Feds cracked them and they've been transferred into the Feds wallet, but I could be wrong.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3682
Merit: 1217
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:08:02 PM |
|
Are you sure they're safe and encrypted? If he had back-ups why would he bother suing? I'm sure the Feds cracked them and they've been transferred into the Feds wallet, but I could be wrong.
The coins were transferred to a different wallet a few hours after Ullbricht was arrested. So I think that the FBI is in possession of the private keys / passwords.
|
|
|
|
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3822
Merit: 2634
Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!
|
|
December 26, 2013, 02:17:33 PM |
|
Are you sure they're safe and encrypted? If he had back-ups why would he bother suing? I'm sure the Feds cracked them and they've been transferred into the Feds wallet, but I could be wrong.
The coins were transferred to a different wallet a few hours after Ullbricht was arrested. So I think that the FBI is in possession of the private keys / passwords. I think there was two sets. The ones they got from seizing SR, and his own personal stash from commissions.
|
|
|
|
bryant.coleman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3682
Merit: 1217
|
|
December 26, 2013, 04:14:55 PM |
|
I think there was two sets. The ones they got from seizing SR, and his own personal stash from commissions.
Is it so? I thought that the FBI seized some 140,000 BTCs, all of which were held in a single online wallet.
|
|
|
|
|
|