|
minternj (OP)
|
 |
December 28, 2013, 02:28:25 AM |
|
No, this address has been mining since 10/6/2013 when HF was still scratching its ass doing nothing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
r1senfa17h
|
|
December 28, 2013, 05:37:37 AM
Last edit: December 28, 2013, 05:51:12 AM by r1senfa17h |
|
Looks like we've been victims of Hanlon's razor in regards to believing HashFast was mining with their customer's hardware. Turns out they've been unable to create a reliable PCB for the chip and are trying revision 2 now. Looks like they couldn't mine even if they wanted to... yet  |
1N3o5Kyvb4iECiJ3WKScKY8xTVXxf1hMvA
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 28, 2013, 05:39:52 AM |
|
Looks like we've been victims of Hanlon's razor in regards to believing HashFast was mining with their customer's hardware. Turns out they've been unable to create a reliable PCB for the chip and are trying revision 2 now. Looks like they couldn't mine even if they wanted to... yet That would be true if they had a habit of actually telling their customers the truth. unfortunately... |
|
|
|
|
|
minternj (OP)
|
|
December 28, 2013, 05:46:51 AM |
|
Looks like we've been victims of Hanlon's razor in regards to believing HashFast was mining with their customer's hardware. Turns out they've been unable to create a reliable PCB for the chip and are trying revision 2 now. Looks like they couldn't mine even if they wanted to... yet Wait so which lie should we believe? On the 20th the board was "performing marvelously". https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/414178131482640384 |
|
|
|
|
AbiTxGroup
|
|
December 28, 2013, 05:48:02 AM |
|
Looks like we've been victims of Hanlon's razor in regards to believing HashFast was mining with their customer's hardware. Turns out they've been unable to create a reliable PCB for the chip and are trying revision 2 now. Looks like they couldn't mine even if they wanted to... yet Wait so which lie should we believe? On the 20th the board was "performing marvelously". https://twitter.com/HashFast/status/414178131482640384LOL Busted. |
|
|
|
|
|
gateway
|
|
December 28, 2013, 05:54:01 AM |
|
Gateway could of course dispel (or confirm) a lot of this speculation by posting an uncensored version of his cgminer photo from the visit.
Though I suppose if the address didn't match, people could just further speculate that they changed addresses.
Thats deff not them.. you guys seriously have nothing else to do, they are not mining with customers hardware.. but well no matter what I say or do it wont matter.. because ill get flamed, some other crap .. etc.. so well continue on guys.. not sure what I say to help.. Crap.. small edit.. while I was talking to a few people on Eligius pool.. a lot of these are in the wild now btw.. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=383486.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
minternj (OP)
|
|
December 28, 2013, 05:57:39 AM |
|
If its not them, then its not them.
When the company says they are shipping on the 21st, then removes a video, then goes silent for another 6 days, what do you propose we do?
|
|
|
|
|
gateway
|
|
December 28, 2013, 06:00:13 AM |
|
If its not them, then its not them.
When the company says they are shipping on the 21st, then removes a video, then goes silent for another 6 days, what do you propose we do?
Not sure buddy, I don't control what they do.. :/ |
|
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 28, 2013, 06:01:57 AM |
|
If its not them, then its not them.
When the company says they are shipping on the 21st, then removes a video, then goes silent for another 6 days, what do you propose we do?
You forgot to add... Use of shill accounts to deliberately deceive customers and squash decent. Deliberate and frequent ninja ex post facto TOS changes. Selling January equipment at October prices knowing full well they wouldn't deliver until the end of December. Promising BTC refunds (jury still out on this one) Anything I forget? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jspielberg
|
|
December 28, 2013, 06:18:28 AM |
|
Well... now that they have posted link to their test machine, I am willing to believe that 160TH/s address is not HF's, but some Antminer farm.
The test machine seems to be running at 700GH/s which if I run the numbers again... if we get the MPP on Feb 3rd, moves the loss to 16BTC/BJ. While that sucks, it is less than the 27 BTC I had calculated earlier at 500GH/s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
minternj (OP)
|
|
December 28, 2013, 06:30:10 AM |
|
I would tend to agree. But keeping an eye out just because there are so many inconsistencies in hashfast's timeline.
It could be possible to be antminers but i very much doubt that. Their public batches were published right in these forums. No one single person bought that much from them. But again, thats publicly posted orders who know how much antminer sold privately.
Edit - Did the math and that would be around ~800 antminers.
|
|
|
|
|
AbiTxGroup
|
|
December 28, 2013, 06:58:34 AM |
|
The default for the antminers had btcguild, a bitman-pool (testnet?), and one other (50 something pool), but not Eligius. I had to put the entries for Eligius and BitMinter into my ants.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RickJamesBTC
|
|
December 28, 2013, 06:58:53 AM |
|
Holy crap thats a lot of power on one account. I'd say they wouldn't be stupid enough to not just generate a few dozen wallet addresses to use with eligius instead of one big one.... but then I think about everything else they have done and said. Cocky and stupid, Hashfast!
F I want 150THs ....
|
|
|
|
|
HarrisonS
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
December 29, 2013, 01:46:49 PM |
|
The user just added another 40TH/s.
|
|
|
|
|
wizkid057
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:23:29 PM |
|
I operate Eligius.
Since I'm not in the business of disclosing private datas, I'll simply point out that 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX is NOT Hashfast.
-wk
|
|
|
|
dhenson
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 994
Merit: 1000
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:26:29 PM |
|
I operate Eligius.
Since I'm not in the business of disclosing private datas, I'll simply point out that 1Nbq2XZaRsKknf5fcT2wTXvBS31PaUWSeX is NOT Hashfast.
-wk
Thank you for clarifying. |
|
|
|
|
|
minternj (OP)
|
|
December 29, 2013, 09:28:24 PM |
|
Fair enough - locked.
|
|
|
|
HashFast_CL
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
HashFast Community Liaison
|
|
December 31, 2013, 08:45:56 PM |
|
We are now to assume that you are hashing with our equipment since the 20th from this.
We have internal test systems. A few of them, like the Baby Jet in our office that is part of the Eligius mining pool, are doing actual mining. This is to do a full, end to end, system test. None of these test systems will be shipped to our customers. We will not use customer systems for our own purposes, especially mining. Best, -HashFast Community Liaison |
"Bitcoin enables ordinary people to fight back, to avoid and evade snooping governments, which enact, use and abuse laws that allow them, without due process, to investigate, tax, control and seize privately owned assets." - Leon Louw
“We can say without equivocation that firms like MasterCard, Visa and the TBTF banks like JPMorgan and Goldman hate the idea of ever having to compete for business again. They have grown comfortable in their corrupt world of writing laws for themselves without any regulatory oversight. They enjoy the exorbitant privilege of bilking the American economy with extortionary transaction rates. They are scared of Bitcoin. And they should be. It offers transparency, cost efficiency and anonymity.” - Max Kaiser
|
|
|
|
Easy2Mine
|
|
December 31, 2013, 08:48:32 PM |
|
@HashFast_CL Where are our tracking numbers?  |
|
|
|
|
