Wrong

[GoWest]

edit: okay, that was a little harsh.  Mods, please delete this thread.

[1714033675]

1714033675

[1714033675]

1714033675

[1714033675]

1714033675

[1714033675]

1714033675

[1714033675]

1714033675

[dub0matic]

wow guess you cant be any less vague

[Bitcoin Swami]

http://chart.ly/9dumj9u

Glad I'm not paying 15 BTC/month for that.

Is that how much he charges?

[xjosx]

http://chart.ly/9dumj9u

Glad I'm not paying 15 BTC/month for that.

Is that how much he charges?

I'm pretty sure he charges 5 BTC/month.

And not to either defend him or criticize him, but GoWest, your analysis of his performance is hardly statistically sound. You're pointing out one data point, one prediction out of hundreds. I'd be more impressed with your analysis if you provided a comprehensive analysis his past predictions over the course of a month or more, rather than a day.

This kind of "troll analysis" is getting retarded here...

[oakpacific]

There was a small rally, as far as I am concerned, but not to 16-17 level which he said was possible, not probable or likely, he may or may not convey the exact peak point in the subscriptions, I don't know, but it seems fair enough to me. And sure, as the previous replier has pointed out, if someone can get every single one of his predictions right and make them freely available, we can officially declare that we have discovered a free crystalball.

Conclusion: OP probably needs to know how to read between the lines.