🤔🤔🤔

[digaran]

🤔🤔🤔

[1714965856]

1714965856

[1714965856]

1714965856

[1714965856]

1714965856

[actmyname]

Right on time.

Once more. actmyname has tagged me for no valid reason. DT has become a joke for these people.

Did you read the reference?

when ever I asked for money to remove any red tags I have left on people?

Did you read the reference?

I'm going to tag these cheaters and ask for $50 for tag removal on the trust feedback

[bill gator]

In case anybody that is interested has somehow missed the rest of the related discussion the thread can be found here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3853171.msg37414857#msg37414857 . Essentially it reads as your typical Meta thread complaining about DT ratings that they disagree with.

Just because a negative rating is left, and you disagree with it, that does not constitute abuse. You continually are attempting to skew Marketplace Trust ratings in exchange for money. You have spoken of extorting scammers for financial gain, in order to release them back on the community to wreak havoc. You have talked about removing negative trust for money, which you clearly have no capability to do. These users have deemed you untrustworthy because of your actions, words and trolling; which part of that is abusive? There is no criteria to leave trust ratings, so I'm very confused which part of this is abuse.

[digaran]

Right on time.

Once more. actmyname has tagged me for no valid reason. DT has become a joke for these people.

Did you read the reference?

when ever I asked for money to remove any red tags I have left on people?

Did you read the reference?

I'm going to tag these cheaters and ask for $50 for tag removal on the trust feedback

I am not here for signature campaigns (as I have never worn a paid signature)

Hello Darkstar_

I understand the campaign is currently full but I would like to ask if you would consider me for a spot if one opens up in the near future.

I also said before, there is no shame in joining a campaign and get some Bitcoin while you are posting a few times a day anyway. but you and global mod coming after me like this. adding somebody to DT2 list with such timings is rather a bit too obvious. there is too much conflict of interest. all I know is that, this is not the way of earning money. not for me.

Requesting to join ChipMixer is probably exactly what someone who doesn't post purely for money does. There's no minimum number of posts which exercises freedom.

If you were in the position where you may have been considered a viable applicant for the campaign, wouldn't you do so? (IIRC this was after the moderator promotion)And where the fuck is the conflict of interest?

Why didn't you tag me then? why did you wait until now? you were aware of the situation but you didn't tag me, why?

[suchmoon]

No worries, I've heard there is this guy who can take care of your red trust for a 0.02 BTC fee.

[actmyname]

I am not here for signature campaigns (as I have never worn a paid signature)

Hello Darkstar_

I understand the campaign is currently full but I would like to ask if you would consider me for a spot if one opens up in the near future.

I also said before, there is no shame in joining a campaign and get some Bitcoin while you are posting a few times a day anyway. but you and global mod coming after me like this. adding somebody to DT2 list with such timings is rather a bit too obvious. there is too much conflict of interest. all I know is that, this is not the way of earning money. not for me.

Requesting to join ChipMixer is probably exactly what someone who doesn't post purely for money does. There's no minimum number of posts which exercises freedom.

If you were in the position where you may have been considered a viable applicant for the campaign, wouldn't you do so? (IIRC this was after the moderator promotion)And where the fuck is the conflict of interest?

Why didn't you tag me then? why did you wait until now? you were aware of the situation but you didn't tag me, why?

I fail to understand:
a) the relevance of the quote in relation to this situation
b) why time plays any factor in feedback - I should be allowed to send feedback at any time, right? There's no time limit.

[digaran]

No worries, I've heard there is this guy who can take care your red trust for a fee of 0.02 BTC.

Bullying me. quoting for reference.

I am not here for signature campaigns (as I have never worn a paid signature)

Hello Darkstar_

I understand the campaign is currently full but I would like to ask if you would consider me for a spot if one opens up in the near future.

I also said before, there is no shame in joining a campaign and get some Bitcoin while you are posting a few times a day anyway. but you and global mod coming after me like this. adding somebody to DT2 list with such timings is rather a bit too obvious. there is too much conflict of interest. all I know is that, this is not the way of earning money. not for me.

Requesting to join ChipMixer is probably exactly what someone who doesn't post purely for money does. There's no minimum number of posts which exercises freedom.

If you were in the position where you may have been considered a viable applicant for the campaign, wouldn't you do so? (IIRC this was after the moderator promotion)And where the fuck is the conflict of interest?

Why didn't you tag me then? why did you wait until now? you were aware of the situation but you didn't tag me, why?

I fail to understand:
a) the relevance of the quote in relation to this situation
b) why time plays any factor in feedback - I should be allowed to send feedback at any time, right? There's no time limit.

Of course, you are free to do as you wish. I don't have any problem with you, I have a problem with your actions, time to change the trust system, you are tagging me right now for something that was resolved in the past. you are using your DT power to harass me.

[bill gator]

No worries, I've heard there is this guy who can take care your red trust for a fee of 0.02 BTC.

Bullying me. quoting for reference.

If you think it is bullying you summarize your service back to you, then I'm not sure where we go from here. You're offended by your own words, we cannot protect you from your own foolishness.

you are tagging me right now for something that was resolved in the past.

They tagged you for attempting to charge people in order to remove red trust. This is exactly what you are attempting to do, again. This was not resolved in the past, since you clearly do not understand what you are doing wrong, although there is a good example of it lying within the past.

you are using your DT power to harass me.

You're the one that made a thread about them, claiming abuse, because you disagree and don't understand the negative ratings you are receiving.

[Flying Hellfish]

The random story that makes no sense starts off with an ice cream truck, a chef, and a piece of Pluto. The guys that owned the ice cream truck stole the piece of Pluto from the pastry chef who obtained it from the flying elephant. The flying elephant got it from a sumo wrestler who obtained it in the sumo championship on Saturn.

They went to Saturn because Jupiter was full of mutant beavcoons. The beavcoons were from Mars where the bubbly bubbles, an ancient gang that was buried in Camelot lived.

The bubbly bubbles came back after the clowns resurrected him in an ancient burial spell of magicalness.

Then the corndog from Venus lead an attack of canoes onto the Russians who responded by taking away McDonalds from China. Since China didn’t have anymore McDonalds they decided to buy a Pizza hut.

wait what are you saying?

http://bookbuilder.cast.org/view_print.php?book=36737

[Literally_farming_merits]

Hey actmyname, you forgot to tag this idiot digorion's alt account. come on now, show us what abuse really looks like. you guys are either stupid or again just stupid, you don't realize that you are helping me this way. now if any of you remove your red tags on me could mean that I can actually help people with their red tags. if you keep them on me forever, I'd be having evidence against you for abusing your DT positions. this is a warning for others, think before tagging people please.

@Bill gates, go spam with your signature else where man.

@Flying Hellfish, actmyname was aware of the situation before, the quote is merely to point out his awareness of situation about the matter, he didn't tag me then but now after I have spoken against his bosses, he has tagged me. I'm sorry to drag you into this man.

[suchmoon]

evidence

You keep talking about this "evidence"... where is it?

[actmyname]

@Flying Hellfish, actmyname was aware of the situation before

What situation? The post that I referenced was taken from Timelord's feedback.

the quote is merely to point out his awareness of situation about the matter,

?

he didn't tag me then but now after I have spoken against his bosses, he has tagged me. I'm sorry to drag you into this man.

After you have spoken against my "bosses"? Who's the boss of me?

Also, don't forget... correlation is not causation.

[digaran]

@Flying Hellfish, actmyname was aware of the situation before

What situation? The post that I referenced was taken from Timelord's feedback.

the quote is merely to point out his awareness of situation about the matter,

?

he didn't tag me then but now after I have spoken against his bosses, he has tagged me. I'm sorry to drag you into this man.

After you have spoken against my "bosses"? Who's the boss of me?

Also, don't forget... correlation is not causation.

You posted where I was talking about marlboroza tagging me. are you sleeping on the class? did you even know what we were talking about back then?

So if Timelord is not on DT anymore, you are making his tags on me to appear by default? aren't you spitting to the faces of people who removed him from DT?





You just woke up right?

[actmyname]

if Timelord is not on DT anymore, you are making his tags on me to appear by default? aren't you spitting to the faces of people who removed him from DT?

IIRC he was never on DT. And even if he was on DT, during the past couple months I know that Timelord certainly was not on DT.Also, just because I did not respond to a series of exchanges back then doesn't mean I don't have the right to do so now. I'm sorry I can't go back in time and tag you a month earlier.

[Cobalt9317]

It looks like I will forever see digaran having a red trust now that actmyname painted on his wall.
digaran remove his avatar now I think this is getting serious not just trolling anymore.

[allahabadi]

It looks like I will forever see digaran having a red trust now that actmyname painted on his wall.
digaran remove his avatar now I think this is getting serious not just trolling anymore.

I at times feel bad for Digaran... I sincerely believe that he's just an overt troll, but not a Scamster; but then I can't judge him for others...

I dunno how others feel on this, but obviously this constitutes as online harassment and if someone responds by saying that look at what @Digaran did, that's no excuse...

[Flying Hellfish]

It looks like I will forever see digaran having a red trust now that actmyname painted on his wall.
digaran remove his avatar now I think this is getting serious not just trolling anymore.

I at times feel bad for Digaran... I sincerely believe that he's just an overt troll, but not a Scamster; but then I can't judge him for others...

Negative trust does NOT mean a person IS a scammer...  Why is it hard to understand that some people SUBJECTIVELY don't fucking trust a mentally ill troll.

I dunno how others feel on this, but obviously this constitutes as online harassment and if someone responds by saying that look at what @Digaran did, that's no excuse...

You're so right NO ONE EVER should be judged by their actions...  ?   ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Do I need a /s here or can people understand my sarcasm...

[suchmoon]

I don't mind some trolling and who among us hasn't done that... God knows how much stupid shit I've posted over the years myself.

I think offering an impossible-to-deliver service and charging a non-refundable fee for it goes beyond merely trolling. If digaran is not serious about this "business" then the red trust won't matter, and if he is serious then the red trust is useful as a warning.

[allahabadi]

Negative trust does NOT mean a person IS a scammer...  Why is it hard to understand that some people SUBJECTIVELY don't fucking trust a mentally ill troll.

Ofcourse as I said; I can't judge him for others, but till date I wasn't aware that trust ratings reflected someone's IQ.

You're so right NO ONE EVER should be judged by their actions...  ?   ? ?? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? Do I need a /s here or can people understand my sarcasm...

I never said that; please stop selectively quoting and misinterpreting. I am pointing out that a lot of members feel, that he is served for his trolling.

I don't mind some trolling and who among us hasn't done that... God knows how much stupid shit I've posted over the years myself.

I think offering an impossible-to-deliver service and charging a non-refundable fee for it goes beyond merely trolling. If digaran is not serious about this "business" then the red trust won't matter, and if he is serious then the red trust is useful as a warning.

You've got a valid point; also when the last time a neg was changed; he started this thing of claiming to defend people.

[digaran]

I don't mind some trolling and who among us hasn't done that... God knows how much stupid shit I've posted over the years myself.

I think offering an impossible-to-deliver service and charging a non-refundable fee for it goes beyond merely trolling. If digaran is not serious about this "business" then the red trust won't matter, and if he is serious then the red trust is useful as a warning.

I want to get paid for spending my time on defending people, who are you to dictate your own terms for my business?