Bitcoin Forum
November 16, 2024, 01:04:07 PM *
News: Check out the artwork 1Dq created to commemorate this forum's 15th anniversary
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Blackarrow specs [OT from Hashfast thread]  (Read 651 times)
Unacceptable (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001



View Profile
December 31, 2013, 11:41:08 PM
 #1

BlackArrow has 100GH miners for $352,so a 200GH for $300 is very doable,but I don't think we'll see them till June or so.

"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole."  -Raylan Givens
Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be
"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan Smiley
brontosaurus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 441
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 01, 2014, 12:43:29 AM
 #2

BlackArrow has 100GH miners for $352,so a 200GH for $300 is very doable,but I don't think we'll see them till June or so.

Had a look at that, but don't understand their design specs. at all:

- 1.56Ghz clock? Why so high - it's just making timing problems for yourself and it's unnecessary because:

- at 0.5W/GH the chip will be dissipating 50 watts. To get rid of that heat reliably, even with water cooling (which isn't mentioned) you'd need a die
   size of around 140 square mm, giving a core area of about 127mm. With 'loose' routing that gives around 190 - 200 million gates, so;

- their 64 unrolled cores use the equivalent of 3 million gates each. As each core has 2 x 64 stages then;

- each stage has 3000000/128 = approx 23k gates per stage. This is 3 - 4 times too many gates per stage.

- based on their own power specs then there are about 60 - 70 million gates switching every clock cycle. Even allowing for control
  circuits that's still 70 million gates used out of an available 190 - 200 million (loosely routed at that) It doesn't make sense. Why not put in more
  cores and  lower the clock speed?

This design really doesn't sound right at all, or someone has seriously screwed up.
Unacceptable (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 01, 2014, 02:00:54 AM
 #3

I'm not an EE,they have units I can afford & no one else does...at 28nm spec's  Roll Eyes

Hoping they deliver,I got 4 ordered over a period of 3 weeks.Personally I'm expecting at least a month delay,so by April they should be shipping  Wink

Thanks Hashfast/KNC/Bitmine/Cointerra,etc,for offering only the highest hashrate equipement  Roll Eyes

Wow,gmax is really getting antsy  Shocked

Where was he 8 months ago  Cheesy

"If you run into an asshole in the morning, you ran into an asshole. If you run into assholes all day long, you are the asshole."  -Raylan Givens
Got GOXXED ?? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9KiqRpPiJAU&feature=youtu.be
"An ASIC being late is perfectly normal, predictable, and legal..."Hashfast & BFL slogan Smiley
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!