CryptAssist (OP)
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 364
Merit: 4
|
|
May 18, 2018, 12:29:30 PM |
|
Has anyone considered hydrogen power? I've seen videos of people producing allot of energy from a small amount using recycled water and powder of a metal, sorry, can't remember which one. If anything are there solar panels sufficient enough to maintain a profitable mining setup?
|
|
|
|
|
|
According to NIST and ECRYPT II, the cryptographic algorithms used in
Bitcoin are expected to be strong until at least 2030. (After that, it
will not be too difficult to transition to different algorithms.)
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
jillscarbrough
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 588
Merit: 335
Steady State Finance
|
|
May 18, 2018, 01:39:47 PM |
|
I haven't heard about hydrogen power that you said as electricity alternative. Solar panels were good enough for handling mining power needs. But there were few conditions related that need to be a consideration. e.g., the weather that will affect how much power can produce. So, you must be double your solar panel from how much energy that needs, but it will cost you more.
The good thing about this alternate energy While you aren't in mining again, you still can use that for supplying another electricity needs.
|
|
|
|
madnessteat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2240
Merit: 1994
|
|
May 18, 2018, 07:45:26 PM |
|
The use of solar panels is not yet rational for mining. Too much money. You need a lot of sun hours in your region. Low profitability of mining. I can't say anything about hydrogen energy.
|
| . .Duelbits. | │ | | │ | ▄▄█▄▄░░▄▄█▄▄░░▄▄█▄▄ ███░░░░███░░░░███ ▀░░░▀░░▀░░░▀░░▀░░░▀ ▄░░░░░░░░░░░░ ▀██████████ ░░░░░███░░░░▀ ░░█░░░███▄█░░░█ ░░██▌░░███░▀░░██▌ ░█░██░░███░░░█░██ ░█▀▀▀█▌░███░░█▀▀▀█▌ ▄█▄░░░██▄███▄█▄░░▄██▄ ▄███▄ ░░░░▀██▄▀ | . REGIONAL SPONSOR | | ███▀██▀███▀█▀▀▀▀██▀▀▀██ ██░▀░██░█░███░▀██░███▄█ █▄███▄██▄████▄████▄▄▄██ ██▀ ▀███▀▀░▀██▀▀▀██████ ███▄███░▄▀██████▀█▀█▀▀█ ████▀▀██▄▀█████▄█▀███▄█ ███▄▄▄████████▄█▄▀█████ ███▀▀▀████████████▄▀███ ███▄░▄█▀▀▀██████▀▀▀▄███ ███████▄██▄▌████▀▀█████ ▀██▄███▀██▄█▄▄▄██▄████▀ ▀▀██████████▄▄███▀▀ ▀▀▀▀█▀▀▀▀ | . EUROPEAN BETTING PARTNER | |
|
|
|
gameboy366
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 8
|
|
May 18, 2018, 08:22:23 PM |
|
I think hydro power is the cheapest. If you can find a cheap hydro dam, buy it to mine btc.
LOL
|
|
|
|
erichall
|
|
May 18, 2018, 08:24:05 PM |
|
The use of solar panels is not yet rational for mining. Too much money. You need a lot of sun hours in your region. Low profitability of mining. I can't say anything about hydrogen energy.
True. However, it would be nice to come fu circle in the crypto world - use blockchain energy project as means of using energy to mine cryptocurrency I think this is very likely to happen in the future.
|
|
|
|
VERONEUM
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 3
Merit: 0
|
|
May 18, 2018, 09:19:26 PM |
|
good
|
|
|
|
Elder III
|
|
May 18, 2018, 09:30:20 PM |
|
We looked into a couple of solar quotes, but they were bloody expensive. We live in a northern(ish) climate, so we don't have optimal hours of sunlight either, especially in the winter. The option that I am hoping works out for us is a natural gas generator , something similar to the one in this link. https://www.centralmainediesel.com/order/General-Motors-21-kW-Generator.asp?page=GM21 --- we do have access to free gas for heating from the gas well in the woods behind us. It remains to be seen if it will work during the winter when we're running the furnace in the house as well as mining or not, but I am fairly confident that it would be able to run the rest of the year at least.
|
|
|
|
Agozyen
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 672
Merit: 252
Until the end
|
|
May 19, 2018, 12:14:01 AM |
|
The use of solar panels is not yet rational for mining. Too much money. You need a lot of sun hours in your region. Low profitability of mining. I can't say anything about hydrogen energy.
Solar prices are coming down. Some places allow you to sell your solar power back to the grid so if you have a surplus what you don't use goes out for others to use. In bad weather and at night you would use grid power.
|
|
|
|
|
mumpungiso
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
May 19, 2018, 04:40:48 AM |
|
I think that makes the most sense at this time for alternative power only solar cell and wind power. And for hydrogen power is still in the stage of development it can not be applied in general, it is still a special use. So my conclusion, for now it is better to use alternative energy available right now only, like solar panel or wind turbine.
|
|
|
|
szafa
|
|
May 19, 2018, 04:57:55 AM |
|
Soon ai find how to produce dark matter and electricity free.
|
|
|
|
manji
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 174
BookiePro.Fun - The World's Betting Exchange
|
|
May 19, 2018, 05:59:32 AM |
|
I just found out that hydrogen power can be used as an alternative energy, if solar panels of course i often hear but problems with Solar Panels are installation and hardware cost very expensive.
|
|
|
|
gameboy366
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 252
Merit: 8
|
|
May 19, 2018, 06:22:12 AM |
|
Nuclear power plants are the best if your country got one. Also Nuclear Energy is the most pro-environment energy on planet. Advances in thorium power plants can make us a intergalactic species. Only a few decades left for completion of Thorium Power plants. India has already developed one but it uses liquid fuel instead of solid, so it's still far from real thorium power plant. Every country has enough Thorium to power themselves for centuries. It is really so good that it is hard to believe it's true. USA already developed a concept thorium power plant in 60s but the project was abandoned as the biggy "drawback" with thorium PP is that they can't be used to produce Nukes and big Oil Corp doesn't want it, so they pay the politicians to halt the research. That's why no nuclear power country was interested in them. Just wanted to spread knowledge about Thorium.
|
|
|
|
adaseb
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 1709
|
|
May 19, 2018, 06:58:05 AM |
|
When you say hydrogen power it can mean 2 things
1) Hydro power which is basicallly power , powered by moving water across the earth. A good example can be the Las Vegas Hoover Dam.
This is most likely very difficult to achieve on your own, even if you live near a natural body of water with a down current.
2) Hydrogen cell power. Basically you take water, extract the oxygen and use it to power either a car or a factory. Problem with this is that it takes more energy these days to create the hydrogen than is created when its consumed. If someone finds an effective way to extract the hydrogen, then they would be richer than Satoshi overnight.
|
|
|
|
warning_btc
Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 11
Decentralized Digital Billboards
|
|
May 19, 2018, 07:16:05 AM |
|
Hydro power cant be constructed at home its very difficult. Nice what you dont want use nuclear energy. Only solar energy you can earn but it not enough to mine and while expensive
|
|
|
|
remauto1187ma
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
|
|
May 19, 2018, 09:40:10 AM |
|
There are so many reasons why it will not be profitable using solar to power mining rigs. You most likely will be dead before your system (solar) achieves ROI.
(1) Upfront cost (Solar panels, switch gear, storage batteries, wire, space to put gear in) (2) efficiency (you lose some of it when converting DC to AC) There is no such thing as 100% efficient when it comes to power. (3) The needed land area for all the solar panels. (4) You better be oversized substantially when its night time! (5) ROI on solar setup big enough to handle your power needs would be a very long time. (DECADES)
The common misconception is that (using a mining rig that draws 1500w of powers) you will only need 1500w worth of energy produced from your solar panels. That cant be any further from reality. Reality is that you will need a much higher solar output to produce 1500w worth of ac because of efficiency losses switching DC to AC. Those losses happen in your inverter, batteries and cables.
Spending $5 to make a nickel is not logical.
|
|
|
|
Etherion
|
|
May 19, 2018, 01:26:48 PM |
|
Has anyone considered hydrogen power? I've seen videos of people producing allot of energy from a small amount using recycled water and powder of a metal...
I also remember seeing video of cars “running" from just tap water... Usually someone trying to con an investor with this or the uninformed masses. As water is combined Hydrogen and Oxygen it has very little energy left to use. Splitting the hydrogen from the oxygen requires alot of energy. In that video or many other like it, the metal is where the energy comes from. So the car is not really running from tap water but is running from the oxidation of the metel unseen in the black box. Burning the hydrogen later or using it in a fuel cell produces energy. But that energy came from the metal. In most cases aluminum powder is used. http://large.stanford.edu/courses/2015/ph240/chen-lh2/But before you go thinks this is the best idea since sliced toast please remember that aluminum as a metal is the result of using alot of energy to turn aluminum oxidade in to a metal. Which is not a very energy efficient process. Aluminum also does not exist in metal form naturally. We can't go mine it for example.
|
|
|
|
Etherion
|
|
May 19, 2018, 01:45:02 PM |
|
There are so many reasons why it will not be profitable using solar to power mining rigs. You most likely will be dead before your system (solar) achieves ROI.
(1) Upfront cost (Solar panels, switch gear, storage batteries, wire, space to put gear in) (2) efficiency (you lose some of it when converting DC to AC) There is no such thing as 100% efficient when it comes to power. (3) The needed land area for all the solar panels. (4) You better be oversized substantially when its night time! (5) ROI on solar setup big enough to handle your power needs would be a very long time. (DECADES)
The common misconception is that (using a mining rig that draws 1500w of powers) you will only need 1500w worth of energy produced from your solar panels. That cant be any further from reality. Reality is that you will need a much higher solar output to produce 1500w worth of ac because of efficiency losses switching DC to AC. Those losses happen in your inverter, batteries and cables.
Spending $5 to make a nickel is not logical.
It is funny how people think that natural power is free power. It is not free. Other than steeling power which is free for you no power is free. You need infrastructure to generate power. That infrastructure can only generate a fix amount of power in its life time. Some uses fuel which cost money or other forms of energy such as wind or solar. But the infrastructure is not free so the power it procure is not free. The return on capital depends on the amount you are paying for the power and the time it can generate that. If the amount of energy x power cost x duration is more than the required capital then you are making a profit. But it depends on the cost of the power that you are using to calculate your return. For example if you are running from domestic power now then the cost of your power would be x. Let say it is 0.18c/kwh. Regardless if you are running for solar or the utility. By reducing the cost of power you will make more on your mins but less in your solar investment. So as a miner you have a fixed amount of capital to invest. If you then choose to invest in solar then you can not buy more miners.
|
|
|
|
Etherion
|
|
May 19, 2018, 02:21:01 PM Last edit: May 19, 2018, 02:44:33 PM by Etherion |
|
There is a partial solution to the problem. If you do run a small mine(5kw) you can pay off a grid tied system fast. As you don't have batteries which is one of the major cost of a solar system.
You will need about 20 300w solar panels and a +6kw inverter. Depending on where you live you might be lucky and get on average 6h of full sun per day.
5kw mine will use 30kwh over 6h perday. So at a cost of 0.18 per Kwh you don't pay the utility $5.4 per day. That is about $2000 per year.
Such a system would set you back $10k. So your return on capital would be about 5 years.
|
|
|
|
remauto1187ma
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 234
Merit: 2
|
|
May 19, 2018, 10:56:40 PM |
|
There is a partial solution to the problem. If you do run a small mine(5kw) you can pay off a grid tied system fast. As you don't have batteries which is one of the major cost of a solar system.
You will need about 20 300w solar panels and a +6kw inverter. Depending on where you live you might be lucky and get on average 6h of full sun per day.
5kw mine will use 30kwh over 6h perday. So at a cost of 0.18 per Kwh you don't pay the utility $5.4 per day. That is about $2000 per year.
Such a system would set you back $10k. So your return on capital would be about 5 years.
You are assuming the solar equipment will last 5 years. Anything in the system dies and you are back in the black. Front 10k to save $2000 a year, maybe...Ill pass.
|
|
|
|
|