Bitcoin Forum
May 24, 2024, 11:35:51 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cgwatcher current hash and avg hash huge diff !  (Read 1242 times)
syedN07 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 01, 2014, 10:46:01 PM
 #1

Hello I just started using cgwatcher ,

My "total current hashrate"  is 100 kh/s but my average is 400


In cgminer my avg hashrates is 403 kh/s

Is there something wrong? Or it's just cgwatcher glitch?

Pls help thank you
deepceleron
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1032



View Profile WWW
January 02, 2014, 12:07:47 AM
 #2

Your miner doesn't send any information about it's actual hashrate to the pool. It only sends shares that it found. A share is the term for a proof-of-work unit your miner creates with difficulty of 1 instead of the full difficulty.

On average, a "share" is found by a miner and sent to a pool every 4,294,967,296 hashes. At your hashrate, you only send a share every 61 seconds on average, but this is variable - it could take 15 seconds for one, and four minutes for the next. Pools can only guess what your actual hashrate is, and their estimations start working better if you have about 10x that hash power.

Pools don't receive a report of miner hashrate, they get difficulty 1 share submissions and must extrapolate what the miner hashrate may be.

The average number of hashes required to find a difficulty one share is:

2**48 / 65535

so we estimate 4,295,032,833 hashes performed by a miner per share submitted.

Then lets estimate a miner's hashrate for the last 10 minutes (600 seconds):

S Shares/600 seconds * 4,295 MHash/share = S (4295/600) MHash/second = S * 7.158388 Mhash/s,

so if a miner finds 60 shares in this 10 minutes, their estimated hashrate is 429.5 Mhash/s.
steelmythos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 10, 2014, 09:20:28 PM
 #3

Hi all, I have a digitalOCean droplet running. does any one know how many workers to put on it for the optimal performance.

Thanks
steelmythos
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 25
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 10, 2014, 09:38:12 PM
 #4

 digitalOcean,

Is the cloud still a goo way to go? it seems slow and encumbered.

thsnks
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!