Campaign manager digaran at your service!

[digaran]

Hello.

I would like to offer my managing services.

No bullshit, no spam. pure high quality posts.

My fee is 0.02 per week for managing 20 participants.

0.03 per week for managing 40 participants.

0.04 per week for managing 50 participants.

Hire me and let us all have a spam free forum.

Contact me via PM, I don't have any other contact details. or post here.

EDIT: meritfarmer96@gmail.com is my email. contact me if you want me to do some work. I also have no past experience, however you could test my service and see for yourself.
As for escrow: I'd want to find a free escrow to hold the funds.

[digaran]

Bump. The Others a.k.a digaran at your service. I will manage your signature campaign. hire me and let us have a spam free forum.

[bill gator]

Have you managed any campaigns in the past? I am wondering if you are qualified or prepared to offer such a service. You seem to have a habit of promising more than you can deliver and your potential clients should be extremely interested in seeing some kind of portfolio or past experience in this area before they go giving you an overwhelming amount of responsibility.

[siddartha1492]

So this is what managers charge for managing signature campaigns here. It has mostly been a secret since managers prefer to discuss rates with their clients in private than in public! Do you think your rates are 1) on average, 2) below average or 3) more than average of the market rate. Choose your option. And no contact info besides PM! What are you, Satoshi!?

On another note, even though you don't have experience managing campaigns and have red trust, I think you are still a much better candidate than these new mushrooms popping up everywhere. I am sure you will at least secure an escrow if you get a campaign for management. You will, right?

[bill gator]

Almost everything digaran does is out of the ordinary and for some reason you believe that his rates for campaign management are representative of the reputable campaign managers around here? I think this would be a mistake, because digaran does not strike me as the type of person that would base their rates upon the rates of other campaign managers; he is a free spirit and will set their rates at whatever they believe their time and effort to be worth.

I wouldn't be so sure about the escrow, because he's a free-spirit and free-thinker, so norms get thrown out the window and presuppositions will cause you to twist your ankle. There are a couple of campaign managers that operate with red trust, and it is always hilarious when one of their requirements for participation within their campaign(s) is to not have negative trust. I'm looking forward to that day, digaran.

[digaran]

Bump. here I am guys. I have added contact info. you could email me to my alt's email address.

[siddartha1492]

LOL, so Billgator was right about you. I though he was just over exaggerating things. Your email address (meritfarmer96@gmail.com), quest to find a free Escrow who is supposed to hold thousands of $ worth of funds makes it clear you aren't serious about this. 

[digaran]

LOL, so Billgator was right about you. I though he was just over exaggerating things. Your email address (meritfarmer96@gmail.com), quest to find a free Escrow who is supposed to hold thousands of $ worth of funds makes it clear you aren't serious about this. 

But I'm serious. don't confuse my humor with not being serious. free escrow so that the company hiring me wouldn't have to pay high fees, I could suggest them to use some low fee escrow.

Bump. open for business, email me.

[HabBear]

hire me and let us have a spam free forum.

Your rates are fair and I appreciate that you're forward about having no past experience. The latter begs questions.

First, how will your campaign management fight the good fight against spam on this forum?

Second, how would you structure your ideal campaign?

[digaran]

hire me and let us have a spam free forum.

Your rates are fair and I appreciate that you're forward about having no past experience. The latter begs questions.

First, how will your campaign management fight the good fight against spam on this forum?

Second, how would you structure your ideal campaign?

Thank you for your post.
First of all, I have no experience but I know the basics, I have been here for more than 2.5 years and I have enjoyed being a part of a few signature campaigns myself. note that financially I can't support crypto, however I want to support decentralized currencies and this forum as the base of my operations.

There is no need for a fixed numbers of posts per week, I believe that we should pay per post with 30 max posts per week.
I wouldn't entertain any spammer or scammer, I would review every single participant one by one before enrolling them.
I wouldn't manage more than 50 people per week. their posts must be constructive and on topic and no post bursting whatsoever.

[BitcoinSupremo]

I like to make a question to you, would you accept red trust participants after seeing that their feedback is unjust and just some power abuse from DT members? I ask this because you yourself claim to be victim of this. It would be interesting to see the answer here.

[digaran]

I like to make a question to you, would you accept red trust participants after seeing that their feedback is unjust and just some power abuse from DT members? I ask this because you yourself claim to be victim of this. It would be interesting to see the answer here.

I have excluded some of the DT2 members from my list, therefore I can no longer see their tags on people, so I wouldn't care about their tags. if they want me to include them again on my list they would have to tag people accurately first.

Bump.

[bill gator]

I wouldn't care about their tags.

Are you talking about the participants or the DT members that have tagged you?
Just to clarify, you are saying that you wouldn't accept members with negative trust, but it is going to be based upon the trust list that makes you no longer have negative trust?

It might be helpful for your future clients to post your trust-list, publicly, so they can make an informed decision about whether or not they agree with your stance, and to avoid future confusion about participants they see as negative trust that you do not.

[digaran]

I wouldn't care about their tags.

Are you talking about the participants or the DT members that have tagged you?
Just to clarify, you are saying that you wouldn't accept members with negative trust, but it is going to be based upon the trust list that makes you no longer have negative trust?

It might be helpful for your future clients to post your trust-list, publicly, so they can make an informed decision about whether or not they agree with your stance, and to avoid future confusion about participants they see as negative trust that you do not.

I would check every single participant's trust page before enrolling them. of course if I see that somebody was tagged for scamming/cheating, I wont enrol them. however if I see that somebody got tagged for something other than scam/cheating, I will let them in.

Consider this a bump. I'm here guys don't forget about me.

[Silent26]

With all those Red Tags, are you really gonna fit and can be trusted to be a Campaign Manager? Although it has nothing to do with a Campaign Manager, "Trust" still has a big role when it comes to Managing Campaigns.
I'm not saying that you don't have the right to be a Manager but it will be hard for you to find a client in this kind of situation of yours.
You're indeed promising but it's not enough to attract clients.

By the way, keep it up. You might hook up customers soon but don't get scammed

[digaran]

With all those Red Tags, are you really gonna fit and can be trusted to be a Campaign Manager? Although it has nothing to do with a Campaign Manager, "Trust" still has a big role when it comes to Managing Campaigns.
I'm not saying that you don't have the right to be a Manager but it will be hard for you to find a client in this kind of situation of yours.
You're indeed promising but it's not enough to attract clients.

By the way, keep it up. You might hook up customers soon but don't get scammed

Sorry to tell you that trust system of this forum is moderated by only a few selected people and what they decide would show on our profiles as default, if you take a look at my red tags you'll know what I'm talking about. I'd also invite you to check the negative tags I have left for some people lately.

What you need to do is to decide for yourself, green or red colors are not any indication of being trustworthy/untrustworthy, people with green trust here are usually the real scammers, note on hundreds of positive feedbacks left on people with no reference, those people want us to trust their words, then take a look at negative feedbacks left on people by the same forum members, you'll see that they are also expecting us to trust their judgements.

Let me explain to you what trust system is in this forum:

Trust system means that when a normal member leaves either +/- on other people, their feedback is worthless by default(untrusted). there are only a few people with trusted feedback, they(80% of them) are corrupt and deceitful, they want to decide whether somebody is trustworthy or not. the moment you start trusting these people and their words, is the moment you'd become their minion, do not let them to dictate who is trustworthy and who is a scammer, do your research and read untrusted feedback first.

After reading my tags it's up to you whether I'm a scammer or not.

[Silent26]

~snip

Nope, I don't believe that you're a scammer, I didn't said that either. What I've just said earlier is it will be really difficult for you to find a client for your service and don't get scammed. Because as you can see, there are lot of people who will take advantage of your red trust to fool you. I just don't want you to be their victim.

I've been following your posts these past months as you really is a good poster and contributes well in the forum by catching scammers and rules violators. But I'm shocked when I saw that they gave you Red Trust, I'm pretty sure that those people who painted your wall has their valid reason to do so that's why we can't blame them. And you're right, sometimes, these paints doesn't describe the real you. These Green and Red paints doesn't describes your real personality. They're just basis of how being trustworthy or untrustworthy you are in this forum, but it is how things works here.

I'm a neutral person, I'm impartial. Your Red Tags doesn't mean you're a bad person in this forum, and those who gave you red paint are not bad guys either. They are just doing what they think is right for the forum and I suggest you to just keep doing what you think is right

Just keep on busting those real scammers etc. and I'm sure that if you've done more good things that contributes well in the forum, they might take back all of those paints.

I'm not dragging you down. This service is worthy of running as long as there are people who still trusts you from what you've done in the past. I'm sure that there are still people who believed and trusts you. As long as you will hook up clients, why not run this service. Just one thing, don't do such things that will destroy your reputation even worse. Don't waste your second chance.

Well, Keep up the good things

[bill gator]

It's funny that you still think negative feedback is equivalent to being a scammer; they are not the same thing. Red Trust means a user does not trust you, and everybody gets to choose their own criteria for whether or not anyone is trustworthy. This is called subjectivity.

I'd love to know which "real scammer" digaran has busted, because I've been following along too and all I see is false claims, lies, exaggeration and an intense claim to entitlement. Digaran believes if you do not trust them, then you are abusing the trust system. Sometimes, being impartial isn't the correct stance to take, because it causes you to come off as uninformed or without morals/standards. You can't be friends with everybody.

Sorry to tell you that trust system of this forum is moderated by only a few selected people

Sorry to tell you, but the alternative is horrendous. The forum should not be moderated by a plethora of individuals.

people with green trust here are usually the real scammers,

Prove it; their trust would go deep red, quickly.

 

there are only a few people with trusted feedback, they(80% of them) are corrupt and deceitful

Your idea of corruption is someone finding you to be untrustworthy. Not even 80% of them meet your criteria for corruption. Please, show the evidence or stop making worthless and lazy claims.

After reading my tags it's up to you whether I'm a scammer or not.

I don't think a single person has called you a scammer. That is not the main-claim against you, bud.

[digaran]

Bump, available for legit campaigns, no scam ICO crap bounty.
Also if you are wondering about my negative trust score, I'm a victim of trust abuse by some old time trust abusers, you could check my trust page and see it for yourself. if you say or do something that a DT member doesn't like, they would tag you with red, this is the standard sanctioned by forum admin for years.