bitpop
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2912
Merit: 1060
|
|
January 05, 2014, 08:18:35 PM |
|
Yeah it feels good no matter the amount
|
|
|
|
mcleo
Member
Offline
Activity: 77
Merit: 10
|
|
January 05, 2014, 08:26:10 PM |
|
Never, but then up until a few days ago I never had a public address.
|
|
|
|
jameschase
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2014, 08:30:29 PM |
|
From here or anywhere? If so how much No actually I didn't. Guess I am not charming enough
|
|
|
|
Lauda
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965
Terminated.
|
|
January 05, 2014, 08:36:30 PM |
|
Nothing so far.
|
"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" 😼 Bitcoin Core ( onion)
|
|
|
tazman2150
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2014, 09:24:10 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
sevensheeps
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 20
Merit: 0
|
|
January 05, 2014, 09:48:24 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Nancarrow
|
|
January 05, 2014, 11:24:55 PM |
|
I have received a few satoshis here and there into addresses that were on the blockchain because I'd spent from them at least once. It wasn't just the addy I have in my signature, but others too. I think this is a fairly well known tactic - somebody wants to link up addresses to get an idea of who owns which address. So they 'spam' the addresses each with a very small amount. Then the recipient *might* post on bitcointalk, "OMG who gave me amount x at address y on date z thank you lol!" and now the sender has made the blockchain just a little less anonymous than it had been before. But even if they don't, as soon as they spend some btc, that little donation likely gets swept up with a bunch of other inputs and now we all know that those inputs are (almost certainly) owned by the same person. Anonymity and therefore privacy are eroded either way.
Not that I mind. Thanks for the coins and I'll just make sure to be more careful about which inputs I link up in my transactions. And/or run 'em through a mixer.
|
If I've said anything amusing and/or informative and you're feeling generous: 1GNJq39NYtf7cn2QFZZuP5vmC1mTs63rEW
|
|
|
Welsh
Staff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3304
Merit: 4115
|
|
January 05, 2014, 11:27:20 PM |
|
I've received tips for helping people but I knew who it came from, so I haven't had a donation from a anonymous person.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinSteve (OP)
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
January 05, 2014, 11:30:41 PM |
|
maybe one day I will (ahem)
|
DRK: XtijFQdCcPpKXmtjKF4xdpy6vCvJTymfzw
BTC: 1LbPHiUfegA3Xjfg4YJkJqLNpaRWDcRPay
|
|
|
Kyt Dotson
|
|
January 06, 2014, 01:46:30 AM |
|
Not yet.
I put up a QR donation code onto my live stream last week just for the hell of it. I mean, why not. I have viewers and fans who have been talking about Bitcoin when it started getting media coverage and I've been covering it for almost 2 years now. I might as well put something up.
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
|
January 06, 2014, 01:58:56 AM |
|
A few small ones for the code in my sig. I've received much more in spam tx to my large wallet address though.
|
1D7FJWRzeKa4SLmTznd3JpeNU13L1ErEco
|
|
|
Kyt Dotson
|
|
January 06, 2014, 02:05:08 AM |
|
A few small ones for the code in my sig. I've received much more in spam tx to my large wallet address though.
Imagine. Making money by publishing TX to an address in some public space (like say via Twitter, Facebook, web, billboard) for transactions over a particular threshold. (Watch it turn out that someone already does this.)
|
|
|
|
|
jubalix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2632
Merit: 1023
|
|
January 06, 2014, 06:53:18 AM |
|
yes a certain amount of GLD, I asked and it was given, inturn i gave out a lot of what i recieved
|
|
|
|
melodiem
|
|
January 06, 2014, 11:03:59 AM |
|
I have received a few satoshis here and there into addresses that were on the blockchain because I'd spent from them at least once. It wasn't just the addy I have in my signature, but others too. I think this is a fairly well known tactic - somebody wants to link up addresses to get an idea of who owns which address. So they 'spam' the addresses each with a very small amount. Then the recipient *might* post on bitcointalk, "OMG who gave me amount x at address y on date z thank you lol!" and now the sender has made the blockchain just a little less anonymous than it had been before.
Um... eep! Lucky for me anonymity is not my thing
|
|
|
|
|