|
jjj0923
|
 |
September 11, 2014, 02:11:08 PM |
|
Getting reports of missing deposits from user
Txids not found in wallet
Block hashes non existant in blockchain
I have suspended 42 deposits and withdrawals until we can get a consensus on the situation
good idea. Only just got round to investigating this. TXID e9ada5d200bd1c4e294bf95a08fd465baa83b6e8323acac14b1f6ac8bac03b53 gone astray ! Im using v0.7.0.0-gbff08fa-beta, noticed transferring between wallets or cryptsy TX disappears. Tried New Wallet: http://www.mediafire.com/download/7m652pme8x9pdxo/42-Win-QT_7.00.zipNew .Conf File: http://www.mediafire.com/download/hnahh4e86zdue1u/42.confStill no joy. Just installed windows wallet: https://www.mediafire.com/?26oz9d29fh9zpzj If it actually sent on the official 42 blockchain then Bigvern at Cryptsy should not have a problem helping you. If it sent on the old chain then you will have to get the newest client and rescan to recover the coins.` Ah, hold on while 9months of blockchain download ...... So how do you know what chain U R on ? my 42 coins have been making it just fine to cryptsy for about 6 weeks now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list. |
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
September 11, 2014, 02:47:46 PM |
|
Getting reports of missing deposits from user
Txids not found in wallet
Block hashes non existant in blockchain
I have suspended 42 deposits and withdrawals until we can get a consensus on the situation
good idea. Only just got round to investigating this. TXID e9ada5d200bd1c4e294bf95a08fd465baa83b6e8323acac14b1f6ac8bac03b53 gone astray ! Im using v0.7.0.0-gbff08fa-beta, noticed transferring between wallets or cryptsy TX disappears. Tried New Wallet: http://www.mediafire.com/download/7m652pme8x9pdxo/42-Win-QT_7.00.zipNew .Conf File: http://www.mediafire.com/download/hnahh4e86zdue1u/42.confStill no joy. Just installed windows wallet: https://www.mediafire.com/?26oz9d29fh9zpzj If it actually sent on the official 42 blockchain then Bigvern at Cryptsy should not have a problem helping you. If it sent on the old chain then you will have to get the newest client and rescan to recover the coins.` Ah, hold on while 9months of blockchain download ...... So how do you know what chain U R on ? you're on the old block chain for sure you can check here: http://42.altcoinexplorer.cf/here's a recent deposit of mine on the new block chain: 52f50ed48661bec9182be2c710a7cc73eca46d1107a549bcdd1d6899251d41e0 |
|
|
|
SamWalters
Full Member
 Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Sam Mother Fuckin' Walters
|
|
September 11, 2014, 09:45:43 PM |
|
Interesting statements mate. I've been quietly watching 42 mining and stats. I think people fell short on this coin, and its real potential. It's still valued in the top region of priced crypto per coin. That draws me interested. What happens when all 42 are minted? Those who hold it can determine what they'll sell it for? So if there is not enough sellers and more buyers of the coin, can they evaluate any price deemed to buy it up? Jeremy this looks good. have you compiled this yourself ? Why did you decide to compile the wallet and help out? I see the mining is still up and down. I've been watching CoinWarz.com for the past 3 months since I enjoy mining for the most profitable. 42 has been the most profitable in the top 10 for a long time now. http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrencyhttp://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/42Seems like coinwarz had it listed as the #1 most profitable coin since this morning. It's been very stable in the top 1-5 positions for a while expect no one talks about it here. The answer to your question is very simple and I'm a little surprised you're even asking - here's the way it works. There are only N number of 42coins minted per day for mining. 'N' number - and the more people you have competing for those 'N' number of coins the less each individual makes with his or her given Hash. so raising awareness accomplishes one thing: less profit for each of the individuals smart enough to determine the coin was a good bet on their own. I've been mining this coin like crazy for months since it fell to 2.5 BTC because I knew it was a good investment. Coinwarz and Whatmine serve one purpose and that's to point lazy miners in the right direction, however those site also ruins it for the people who do their own research and bring a good thing to an end. Now that 42's Network hash is over 2 GH/s it's time me to move on to another coin since 'the word is out' and profitability is going down faster than a sinking ship. My mining philosophy is in direct contradiction to the multi pools and sites like Coinwarz. They only look at instant profitability and the problem is (or good thing for me) is that many people follow their top list list like lemmings and run from coin to coin only to discover that once they arrive, that network hash and difficulty have skyrocketed and then they sit and wonder why that haven't made what Coinwarz said they would make - well DUH!!! I work the opposite way - I ONLY mine coins with low network hash that have low difficulties and are in troughs value wise and thank you very much - it works great for me. 42 has been like that for the past 3 months. YEEHAW! - Sold at 14 yesterday and mined at 2.5 when Network Hash was down around 400MH. do yourself a favor when you visit those sites - start looking at the bottom of their lists - not the top - you'll be much better off long term and never late to the show. LOL |
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
September 11, 2014, 09:53:13 PM |
|
sam - how long before they're all minted? have you done the math?
you never know what kind of life a coin will have after they're all minted - some coins live long and prosper and some just fade way - I think it depends on the dev and if the dev tries to breath new life into the coin with some marketing.
|
|
|
|
SamWalters
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Sam Mother Fuckin' Walters
|
|
September 11, 2014, 09:58:40 PM |
|
I have not done the math. I think it could be 6 months. sam - how long before they're all minted? have you done the math?
you never know what kind of life a coin will have after they're all minted - some coins live long and prosper and some just fade way - I think it depends on the dev and if the dev tries to breath new life into the coin with some marketing.
|
|
|
|
|
jjj0923
|
|
September 11, 2014, 10:11:23 PM |
|
I found on wikipedia a better explanation of number 42, I guess we should stick with this: 42 (forty-two) is the natural number immediately following 41 and directly preceding 43.
I just did the math 1,000,000 blocks current block is: 347,058 2,064 blocks per day : 753,350 block per year. therefore my man - this coin will be mined out in less than 1 year  |
|
|
|
SamWalters
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 238
Merit: 100
Sam Mother Fuckin' Walters
|
|
September 11, 2014, 10:27:11 PM |
|
Thank you for these stats. I found on wikipedia a better explanation of number 42, I guess we should stick with this: 42 (forty-two) is the natural number immediately following 41 and directly preceding 43.
I just did the math 1,000,000 blocks current block is: 347,058 2,064 blocks per day : 753,350 block per year. therefore my man - this coin will be mined out in less than 1 year |
|
|
|
Jeremy10001000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
September 12, 2014, 01:40:56 PM
Last edit: September 12, 2014, 01:59:59 PM by Jeremy10001000 |
|
Jeremy this looks good. have you compiled this yourself ? Why did you decide to compile the wallet and help out? I see the mining is still up and down. I've been watching CoinWarz.com for the past 3 months since I enjoy mining for the most profitable. 42 has been the most profitable in the top 10 for a long time now. http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrencyhttp://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/42Seems like coinwarz had it listed as the #1 most profitable coin since this morning. It's been very stable in the top 1-5 positions for a while expect no one talks about it here. Yes I did, also I sent off an EMail to the new dev, I would like to help in something like beta testing. I'm 16 and no one will give me a chance! xD Also I feel like this coin is from the community! |
|
|
|
|
Led
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
September 14, 2014, 09:11:59 PM |
|
I ONLY mine coins with low network hash that have low difficulties and are in troughs value wise
Thanks for revealing to us your secrets, but 42 coin value is still in a trough! Network hashrate is dropping to something more sustainable. Now we just need whoever is updating the info in the first post on this thread to pay attention and update the info in a timely manner. hashfaster and poolwarz pools are both working for me. http://www.wurst-wasser.net/wiki/images/3/31/So_long_and_thanks_for_all_the_fish.png |
|
|
|
|
calvinweight
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
September 15, 2014, 04:29:46 PM
Last edit: September 15, 2014, 04:52:50 PM by calvinweight |
|
Anyone know why the available supply dropped off on 42 coin on the September 11th? I'm looking at http://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/42-coin/ and wondering why it shows less than 1 42 coin.... |
|
|
|
|
Caberhagen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2014, 09:52:31 AM |
|
Hi here is a new 42 Pool. http://42.virtualcoin.chPPLNS Pay Per Last N Shares 1% Pool Fee 0.00000001 Transaction Fee Variable Difficulty Memcached Stratum Payout auto and manual. Feel free to test... CU |
|
|
|
|
calvinweight
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 0
|
|
September 17, 2014, 06:56:39 PM |
|
Seriously - no one? Did 42 coin go belly up? |
|
|
|
|
Jeremy10001000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
September 21, 2014, 06:23:00 PM |
|
Hi here is a new 42 Pool. http://42.virtualcoin.chPPLNS Pay Per Last N Shares 1% Pool Fee 0.00000001 Transaction Fee Variable Difficulty Memcached Stratum Payout auto and manual. Feel free to test... CU I like it! Been using it, username is Jeremy10001000 |
|
|
|
|
iozen
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
|
|
October 04, 2014, 04:06:53 AM |
|
Seriously - no one? Did 42 coin go belly up? It's a dead coin. Was nice at one point, but that was long ago. |
|
|
|
|
talson
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
October 09, 2014, 12:19:05 PM |
|
Help .... wallet v6 eu I have a balance on it .... put the wallet v 7 - he does not see (not confirmed) my balance. also can not carry out the transaction v 6 on Cryptsy or anywhere, and does not make a transfer to Wallet v 7 ....
What do I do? prompt! ATP!
|
|
|
|
|
Jeremy10001000
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
|
|
October 10, 2014, 03:31:08 AM |
|
Help .... wallet v6 eu I have a balance on it .... put the wallet v 7 - he does not see (not confirmed) my balance. also can not carry out the transaction v 6 on Cryptsy or anywhere, and does not make a transfer to Wallet v 7 ....
What do I do? prompt! ATP!
You have to start over!  Like I did! |
|
|
|
|
athur0s
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
October 17, 2014, 08:15:02 PM |
|
Is there any working block explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
psikogeek
Member
Offline
Activity: 65
Merit: 10
|
|
October 27, 2014, 06:17:44 PM |
|
Rumors of my demise are premature.
Rumors of 42 demise are unfounded.
MEA CULPA:
I have not posted here in around 2 months. In that time, I've found a related projects that matter to this one. Mostly, I've discovered that clouds are coming of age with Docker and CoreOS. This matters to me and to the 42 as it opens the door to inexpensive hosting of web assets (like nodes and websites) robustly. By robustly, I mean reliably and with a low upkeep cost.
This last item has become more important since one of the great properties of the 42 has been decaying away: swift transactions aided by at least 8 reliable nodes. I just punched my wallet and have spent a few minutes to find just 3. When I have a battery of web hosts, I'll created Docker containers for more nodes.
I don't know that I have any avid followers of this thread at this time. If you are one, you may recall that there was some discussion of underlying algorithm. In particular, I proposed Proof of Stake, and was given incentive to go only partially Proof of Stake. That future and others are still held open as options.
I AM IN NO HURRY. I see no reason to hurry as there is much to think about. I note that the 42 rate at Cryptsy seems to have been steady at 4 and a fraction for quite some time. In time, I think that will rise.
Till then,
long live the 42. It will outlive you and me.
P.S. EMERGENCIES: I scan this forum for reports of things that are emergencies. I don't see any. The most serious lately has been the report of orphans, but later posts seem to explain/resolve that one.
|
|
|
|
|
funkenstein
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1066
Merit: 1050
Khazad ai-menu!
|
|
October 27, 2014, 09:11:41 PM |
|
Hello 42 ers!
By my back of the envelope calculations there are some 26 or so 42coins in the wild. Is this pretty accurate? The "coincap" sites always seem to get it wrong.
Also, I am disappointed to see nothing in the code that puts a cap on the number of coins at 42. The getBlockValue() in main.cpp never reduces, always staying at .000042 per block (apart from the superblocks which do basically nothing). This means there is no cap on supply.
This is much more important than the MAX_MONEY=42 variable set in main.h, which will only trigger an error when people start to try to move more than 42 coins at a time. I know this because when I released Woodcoin, there was MAX_MONEY=10000 mistakenly set in the main.h file. We had more than a million logs issued and the only problem was that people's clients would crash if they tried to move more than 10000 at once.
I would recommend updating the code for a "soft landing" at 42 total coins. in other words sometime in the future the reward is going to have to start to decrease. In my opinion it ought to decrease in a geometric series that converges at 42. If you want some help figuring a nice way to do that only using the number 42, let me know. Its a nice exercise though so I wouldn't take that pleasure away from the devs here.
Another way you could do it would be to add a line in getBlockValue like (if nHeight>988000) reward=0+nFees. block 988000 is just my quick estimate of when the supply will reach 42 if nothing is changed. Less than a year from now. If you go this route, at that point the reward will suddenly disappear as 42 42coins are in the wild.
If you do nothing, the coin supply will sail by 42 42coins and the price will continue tanking.
Cheers -- funkenstein the dwarf
|
|
|
|
BitcoinNational
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
|
|
October 28, 2014, 10:59:10 AM |
|
Hello 42 ers!
By my back of the envelope calculations there are some 26 or so 42coins in the wild. Is this pretty accurate? The "coincap" sites always seem to get it wrong.
Also, I am disappointed to see nothing in the code that puts a cap on the number of coins at 42. The getBlockValue() in main.cpp never reduces, always staying at .000042 per block (apart from the superblocks which do basically nothing). This means there is no cap on supply.
Cheers -- funkenstein the dwarf
funkenstein might be the smartest person in the room Armis pls do assist |
|
|
|
|
