|
rikur
|
 |
August 30, 2011, 04:06:19 PM |
|
Check the 'interesting email' thread for a sample, his username on many sites where he discusses these things is punlman
Hmmh, okay the nicknames do seem to link. It does not yet prove that others could not use it. Any references to actual child abusing instead of just gay stuff? I'll look into this a bit more once I get back home. Thanks ! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whoever mines the block which ends up containing your transaction will get its fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
JeffK
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 350
Merit: 250
I never hashed for this...
|
|
August 30, 2011, 04:26:57 PM |
|
There is a chance someone out there might have used the name somewhere, but it is kinda unique in that the first part (separated into punl-man) is something of his own creation, where somewhere (can't find source atm) stands for something like 'Pure Unconditional Non-judgemental Love' (also the name of a book he claims to be writing)
also the wording very much sounds like the kind of codified language someone might use when doing something illegal
|
|
|
|
|
Piper67
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1001
|
|
August 30, 2011, 04:28:46 PM |
|
There is a chance someone out there might have used the name somewhere, but it is kinda unique in that the first part (separated into punl-man) is something of his own creation, where somewhere (can't find source atm) stands for something like 'Pure Unconditional Non-judgemental Love' (also the name of a book he claims to be writing)
also the wording very much sounds like the kind of codified language someone might use when doing something illegal
Or... someone else just used his established nickname. This doesn't even come close to the standard of evidence needed to indict, let alone convict someone. It's a joke. |
|
|
|
|
Gabi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008
If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat
|
|
August 30, 2011, 04:33:05 PM |
|
There is a chance someone out there might have used the name somewhere, but it is kinda unique in that the first part (separated into punl-man) is something of his own creation, where somewhere (can't find source atm) stands for something like 'Pure Unconditional Non-judgemental Love' (also the name of a book he claims to be writing)
also the wording very much sounds like the kind of codified language someone might use when doing something illegal
Nice, even more trolling |
|
|
|
|
indio007
|
|
August 30, 2011, 04:41:32 PM |
|
Mods can we merge the umpteen "Bruce" threads? Also change the topic to "Monkeys throw feces at each other".  |
|
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
August 30, 2011, 08:02:20 PM |
|
Still no example of any occasion when I voiced an opinion on being gay.
Not even one.
Just blame it on the assburgers.
|
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
August 30, 2011, 09:25:09 PM |
|
That's some serious accusation you have there. Let's look at the situation: Someone threw a joke that you scammed some coins from the MyBitcoinCoin and now you're going all out how the person is abusing 7 year old children and what not. That's way out of scale man.
Please do post your own proof: what are the other aliases of Bruce Wagner that are discussing about child abuse and how did you come to the conclusion that they are the same person?
I'm open minded and not locking any possibilites away. So please do elaborate on your claims.
Oh, that was a JOKE! Well my bad. Some news reporter in a foreign country was just making a JOKE when she told the world that I'm a thief. Bruce is a con artist and he surely conned you, didn't he? Joke indeed. So assburgers, where is that proof that I made some negative judgement about being gay. Come on already. Lets see some proof of your claims! You call me a homophobe, show your work! |
|
|
|
|
ctoon6
|
|
August 30, 2011, 09:25:44 PM |
|
Still no example of any occasion when I voiced an opinion on being gay.
Not even one.
Just blame it on the assburgers.
if your homophobic, just say so. also, i find this thread to be very funny |
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
September 01, 2011, 10:54:47 AM |
|
I'm still waiting.
Where is this proof of irrational fear of homosexuals?
Losers hiding behind the internet feel safe to shout perjoratives and express fighting words, come on now and back it up now.
I can back up everything I say. Why not you in this simple demand?
|
|
|
|
|
elggawf
|
|
September 01, 2011, 12:53:56 PM |
|
I answered you earlier, you ignored it. So I just answered you in another thread.
|
^_^
|
|
|
Vandroiy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1002
|
|
September 01, 2011, 12:59:08 PM |
|
We all know "raping minors" for the magical trump card of western internet. Even if directed at a very shady person, I ignore this if it doesn't have solid proof. People get scared by the topic itself due to the child pornography laws, so vague accusations are used where exact explanations should be. I've seen this game often enough, the magical child porn weapon. Especially effective when one is able to insert data in another person's computer, but that's not mandatory at all.
It is time for some concise proof that Bruce Wagner had forced sexual activity with minors -- note that the claim was explicitly on rape -- to distinguish this thread from slander. In fact, the form of the thread itself is strange. Where is the link to the place where the "international business of selling opportunity to rape children" was exposed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
September 04, 2011, 04:41:27 AM |
|
We all know "raping minors" for the magical trump card of western internet. Even if directed at a very shady person, I ignore this if it doesn't have solid proof. People get scared by the topic itself due to the child pornography laws, so vague accusations are used where exact explanations should be. I've seen this game often enough, the magical child porn weapon. Especially effective when one is able to insert data in another person's computer, but that's not mandatory at all.
It is time for some concise proof that Bruce Wagner had forced sexual activity with minors -- note that the claim was explicitly on rape -- to distinguish this thread from slander. In fact, the form of the thread itself is strange. Where is the link to the place where the "international business of selling opportunity to rape children" was exposed?
All of Bruce's conferences and "meet-ups" have been held in or planned for homocentric venues. It seems pretty clear that bitcoin is just a cover for his real agenda. For years he has openly bragged of being a sex tourist, bragged of traveling to places famous for child prostitues and told the world of his hiring "boys" in these places. Regardless of the ages of these boys, the conclusion is the same. Bruce is a pervert. He is also a liar and a con man and a thief. The proof of all this is in his own words, posted to the public internt, revelling in his own obscenity and in the public record of his convictions for sex crimes and financial judgements that he has ran away from. |
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
September 04, 2011, 04:49:43 AM |
|
I answered you earlier, you ignored it. So I just answered you in another thread.
No, you did not show any proof that I have ever voiced an opinion on homosexuality. All you posted was your own opinon of what you think I might say. Come on you ass-clowns. Let's see the proof to back up your claims. You know my next challenge; What make you entitled to your opinion and me not to mine? Why the double standard? Now that you have started the insults, you leave me free to reciprocate. Do you think that your gang of fairies is going to save you from my wrath? Do I sound afraid of homos yet? One thing that really exposes the disingenuous is their willingness to say from behind their net connection what they would never dare say IRL. Note that anything I say online, I will say to your face. You cannot make that claim methinks. |
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2011, 05:14:21 AM |
|
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
September 04, 2011, 05:32:46 AM |
|
Who are you to tell me what I can start on? What a lame attempt to change the subject. Read the whole thread ass clown. The OP was trying to card WU and cash out through my exchange. When I thwarted his crime, he did what ass clowns are famous for. He lied in public. The other ass clowns were either trying to SE me or became so insulting as to inspire me to exersize my right of association. People without morals know no boundries. You can count yourself among that number or not by choice of free will. Now, where is the proof I asked for? All we have here is proof that ass clowns hide their immorality behind insults and that by their devience they expect to be exempted from responsibility for choosing to lie, cheat, steal and sodomise. |
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 04, 2011, 05:54:50 AM |
|
bro, I think you derailed long ago, maybe you will find some peace of mind backing all your accusations in a criminal court
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
September 04, 2011, 06:25:08 AM |
|
Accusations? Bruce admitted his crimes. I only pointed that out.
The only false accusation that still needs addressing is his using the media to accuse ME of a crime.
So, where is this proof I'm asking for?
There is none.
You perverts think you can do whatever you like and be excused for it by crying "bigot" and "homophobe". That shit does not work on me. I will grind on you forever if I want to. I am right and you are wrong. It's like science. It's not a matter of opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
NghtRppr
|
|
September 04, 2011, 06:27:05 AM |
|
You perverts... Are you asserting that all homosexuals are perverts? |
|
|
|
|
|
nanaimogold (OP)
|
|
September 04, 2011, 07:22:06 AM |
|
You perverts... Are you asserting that all homosexuals are perverts? If you need definitions, try dictionaries. |
|
|
|
|
NghtRppr
|
|
September 04, 2011, 07:24:14 AM |
|
You perverts... Are you asserting that all homosexuals are perverts? If you need definitions, try dictionaries. Why are you avoiding the question? Are you afraid to be straightforward? I'm not asking what a dictionary says. I'm asking what you're asserting. A simple yes or no will suffice. Let me ask again. Are you asserting that all homosexuals are perverts? |
|
|
|
|
|
