Bitcoin Forum
November 11, 2024, 08:44:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Which do you feel is the "best" name to uniquely identify the 0.0001 BTC unit?
1 bip = 0.0001 BTC
1 bit = 0.0001 BTC
1 finney = 0.0001 BTC
1 nakamoto = 0.0001 BTC

Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: Name the 0.0001 BTC unit - Final Poll  (Read 6902 times)
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195



View Profile
January 09, 2014, 06:56:27 PM
 #41

Wow, "nakamoto" is catching up to "bit" real fast!

It's actually in the lead now.
BitchicksHusband
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 255


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 06:57:19 PM
 #42

0.1 mBTC

Winner.

1BitcHiCK1iRa6YVY6qDqC6M594RBYLNPo
Tisko
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 33
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 07:05:28 PM
 #43

no matter what the poll results, I predict finney will catch on in practice
willphase
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 767
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 07:13:42 PM
 #44

0.1 mBTC

this.

Will

droptable
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 363
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 07:23:42 PM
 #45

no matter what the poll results, I predict finney will catch on in practice

+1

DΛRKCOIN -> is now -> DΛSH
----------
not DashCoin, not DarkDash, not anything. The Name has been / is changed the tech stays the same
DeboraMeeks
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 588
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 07:39:19 PM
 #46

bit bitcoin is the first one right now and I think it's suitable,Of course this depend on people and if they will or won't use that term as this isn't so official I guess.
nwbitcoin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 250


You are a geek if you are too early to the party!


View Profile WWW
January 09, 2014, 07:49:03 PM
 #47

I like the term Finny because it is respectful of the early history of bitcoin, and therefore a valuable reason to use it.

All the other terms have a feel of being smart arse and I doubt would be used by real users in years to come.


*Image Removed*
I use Localbitcoins to sell bitcoins for GBP by bank transfer!
nodroids
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 07:54:40 PM
 #48

I voted 1 Nakamoto because eventually that will just be called a Naka, and I really like that... Just sounds cool like an Cockney Londoner saying 2 bob please Gov, except for more Bladerunneresque.
nodroids
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 07:57:50 PM
 #49

Oh darn, shoulda voted for Finney... The basic point was made about the 6th decimal point needing to be the Naka before the Satoshi in the 7th decimal point. Missed that! Doh!
medUSA
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 952
Merit: 1005


--Signature Designs-- http://bit.ly/1Pjbx77


View Profile WWW
January 09, 2014, 08:21:40 PM
 #50

I voted 1 Nakamoto because eventually that will just be called a Naka

Yes, that's right! I think "bitcoin" may eventually shortens to "bit".
So it would be silly to call 0.0001btc "bit" again
brioche
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 192
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 09, 2014, 10:45:51 PM
 #51

I like the idea of sticking to Japanese names. Maybe on the next naming poll we might see a Miku or a Moe Kiss

\   \  \ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\◥◣◢◤//////////////// /  /   /
North Carolina ❖ First in Flight ❖ /   /  / ////////////////◢◤◥◣\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \  \   \
socosavvy
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 68
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 11:21:55 PM
 #52

tidBIT OR hobBIT lol Cheesy
keithron
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 11:45:32 PM
 #53

If you think "nakamoto" would stick as a name, you're sorely mistaken.  4 syllables, really?  Look at all the slang for money:   Cash, bucks, bill, bread, roll, brick, etc etc.  Nakamoto would easily become "Nak" or "Naka" within a year, provided it received wide-spread adoption.  Save Nakamoto for .00000000001 bitcoin when it becomes divisible as such.
Qim
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 22
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 12:23:00 AM
 #54

1 bip = 0.0001 BTC   - 37 (24%)
1 bit = 0.0001 BTC   - 41 (26.6%)
1 finney = 0.0001 BTC   - 38 (24.7%)
1 nakamoto = 0.0001 BTC   - 38 (24.7%)

Wow ! so close ! Shocked
bitbrasil
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 01:26:11 AM
 #55

bit is far too generic (even my username uses it) and it has the wrong meaning in this context.
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:20:41 AM
 #56

What about a 'blip' instead?  Smiley
Lol... I dunno, that sounds a bit weird. I think if Nakamoto is shortened to Naka or Moto that would be a good option.

His name is Nakamoto ....... or should we have shortened Satoshi to "Sat" or "Oshi"? Smiley
air_bob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 02:24:36 AM
 #57

just feel nakamoto will be a cool name  Cool
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:51:16 AM
 #58

just feel nakamoto will be a cool name  Cool

Absolutely right Smiley
stogaer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 11
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 04:19:32 AM
 #59

Nakamoto is just too many syllables!

I don't like the choices in this poll.

bip would be the best of those options offered because it is a single syllable (like "cent") and just 3 letters (like btc), so very parsimonious. Unfortunately, someone else says it might be a little bit of a problem because it is not unique (the BIP acronym, Bitcoin Improvement Protocol).

I still like the idea of something like

boin

or boink or bink.
Glynn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 05:04:14 AM
 #60

"bip" is a natural.
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 5 6 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!