Bitcoin Forum
November 03, 2024, 12:27:19 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: How did “satoshi” become the name of the base unit?  (Read 1605 times)
R2D221 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 09, 2014, 08:18:44 PM
 #1

I'm pretty new to Bitcoin, but I know some basic things, like who Satoshi Nakamoto is (or isn't... since it's a pseudonym) and how his name was used for the base unit of Bitcoin (1×10^-8 BTC)... but why is it called like this? Did Satoshi decided this name, or others started using it in their honor? What's the history behind this?

I'm asking mainly because I've seen the recent “0.0001 BTC name poll”. Is this how the base unit was also named?

An economy based on endless growth is unsustainable.
ribuck
Donator
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1060


View Profile
January 09, 2014, 08:49:00 PM
Merited by o_e_l_e_o (4), JayJuanGee (1), BlackHatCoiner (1)
 #2

I was the one who proposed the name satoshi.

On 15 November 2010, in this post, I suggested calling 0.01 BTC a "satoshi". At the time, 0.01 BTC was the smallest unit that could be displayed by the user interface in the standard client, even though the protocol supported eight decimal places.

The discussion progressed, and on 10 February 2011 I proposed naming the smallest base unit (0.00000001 BTC) either an "austrian" or a "satoshi". In retrospect it's obvious that "satoshi" was the better name.

On 18 February 2011, marcus_of_augustus posted "100 million satoshis = 1 bitcoin. Are we agreed?" to which someone responded "affirmative", and the usage caught on.

Satoshi Nakamoto referred to the base unit simply as a "coin" in his writings.
R2D221 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 09, 2014, 09:06:25 PM
 #3

Thanks, it's interesting to know  Smiley

An economy based on endless growth is unsustainable.
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:01:04 AM
 #4

Great answer and interesting to know the source Smiley

And no, nothing to do with all the polls that have been running recently. They are completely meaningless. Finished today, forgotten tomorrow.
air_bob
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 10
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
January 10, 2014, 02:06:49 AM
 #5

Very interesting to know this story Cheesy
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 02:48:23 AM
 #6

I was the one who proposed the name satoshi.

On 15 November 2010, in this post, I suggested calling 0.01 BTC a "satoshi". At the time, 0.01 BTC was the smallest unit that could be displayed by the user interface in the standard client, even though the protocol supported eight decimal places.

The discussion progressed, and on 10 February 2011 I proposed naming the smallest base unit (0.00000001 BTC) either an "austrian" or a "satoshi". In retrospect it's obvious that "satoshi" was the better name.

On 18 February 2011, marcus_of_augustus posted "100 million satoshis = 1 bitcoin. Are we agreed?" to which someone responded "affirmative", and the usage caught on.

Satoshi Nakamoto referred to the base unit simply as a "coin" in his writings.

To get this right .... it wasn't even called a "bitcoin" until February 2011? i.e. the base unit "Satoshi" came first.

Please correct me if I've got this completely screwed Smiley
empoweoqwj
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 10, 2014, 10:52:52 AM
 #7

No, you have that wrong. Satoshi called it Bitcoin, even in his earliest writings before the software was released.  It's the smallest unit, which we now call a Satoshi, that he called a "coin".

Ah I see. Thanks for the clarification!!
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!