Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2018, 10:22:11 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Did KnC make a mistake by choosing to go down the 20nm route?  (Read 581 times)
mackminer
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 345
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 16, 2014, 01:28:03 PM
 #1

As far as I can see there are going to be lots of powerful machines out before, that will be more than 1TH.

Seems like there fucked to me....opinions?

1BFf3Whvj118A5akc5fHhfLLwxYduMmq1d
1524738131
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524738131

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524738131
Reply with quote  #2

1524738131
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1524738131
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524738131

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524738131
Reply with quote  #2

1524738131
Report to moderator
1524738131
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1524738131

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1524738131
Reply with quote  #2

1524738131
Report to moderator
rext
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
January 16, 2014, 01:52:08 PM
 #2

only time will tell, well as least they do deliver products that last.

Gator-hex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 500


View Profile
January 16, 2014, 02:39:04 PM
 #3

A dedicated ASIC will always beat an FPGAtoASIC unless you go one node lower.

FPGAtoASIC is faster and easier to develop, gets you out before the competition, but costs more per chip.

Just my suspicion. Not proof.  Wink

novello
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 161
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 16, 2014, 03:15:37 PM
 #4

A dedicated ASIC will always beat an FPGAtoASIC unless you go one node lower.

FPGAtoASIC is faster and easier to develop, gets you out before the competition, but costs more per chip.

Just my suspicion. Not proof.  Wink

I'm sure I read somewhere a while back that the KNC solution is an FPGA conversion, and that would fit with it's power consumption. Going to 20nm at this time is a mistake - the process isn't fully 'productionised' yet and might take another 6 months before yields are stable. the NRE is truly horrendous and same for the wafer costs. You always pay a premium for the newest process.

As a result, newer 28nm designs will easily beat their 20nm one in cost efficiency but since they've already sold a ton of them, I doubt very much that they'll care. Their customers might though.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!