Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2024, 07:50:10 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Middlecoin/cgminer issues?  (Read 973 times)
carpb202 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2014, 05:37:38 PM
 #1

Hey all!

So I'm a super newbie to all this (only been mining for a few days). Following some advice on reddit, I started using cgminer and pointed it to middlecoin. Here is my script for cgminer:

cgminer -o stratum+tcp://middlecoin.com:3333 -u 1M8Nze... -p x

This is the recommended script from the middlecoin webpage with the exception of --scrypt. When i use the --scrypt my hash generation is ~6Kh/s but without it's ~50Mh/s so I leave the --scrypt off.

Prior to cgminer, I used minerd for CPU mining. This was generating ~7kh/s per processor ( 8 ), so I switched to cgminer.

However, using cgminer, my information on middlecoin does not update. I'm not sure if this is related to the issues with the site or with cgminer. Everything looks good on cgminer, but I'm not getting any Accepted MH/s or Rejected MH/s which I was getting for minerd.

Here is a copy of my cgminer screen:

 cgminer version 3.7.2 - Started: [2014-01-17 11:13:03]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 (5s):50.18M (avg):50.71Mh/s | A:0  R:0  HW:0  WU:0.8/m
 ST: 2  SS: 0  NB: 145  LW: 771  GF: 0  RF: 0
 Connected to middlecoin.com diff 1.02K with stratum as user 1M8Nze
 Block: 19371e8b...  Diff:3.93K  Started: [12:35:02]  Best share: 161
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 [P]ool management [G]PU management [Settings [D]isplay options [Q]uit
 GPU 0:                | 50.11M/50.73Mh/s | A:0 R:0 HW:0 WU:0.8/m I: 3

Does this look good? Am I missing anything? Any help would be greatly appreciated!

Thanks!
inthemud
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2014, 06:07:38 PM
 #2

It looks like you might be hashing in SHA256 instead of Scrypt mining. The stats shown in mhs instead of khs is usually a dead give away. Put the --scrypt argument back in the command. Right now it appears that you are generating garbage hashes.
carpb202 (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 17, 2014, 06:48:41 PM
 #3

Thanks! So if that's the case, would it be better for me to continue using minerd? Since each core give me 7k? I'm not sure which would be the best use of resources, gpu or cpu.
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!