So you would need 5,372 of those bad boys to get 51%. That's a $54 million investment in hardware.
...
So there's really no economic incentive for performing a 51% attack for the purpose of double-spending against Bitcoin.
That doesn't mean it won't or can't happen, it just means the likelihood of it occurring is pretty small.
For a government wishing to destroy bitcoin because it competes with their fiat currency, investment of $54 million USD will be considered cheap. Likelyhood of such attack may not be so small. Gov can wreak havoc by doublespending, or by not allowing arbitrary transactions. Probably was at least considered at some government level. The effect of having 51% is not completely devastating, as it is not possible to just steal wallets, but can land a big blow to trust in bitcoin.