|
Squeaker
|
 |
February 01, 2014, 04:56:03 AM |
|
It is only January yet we already have a candidate for the stupidest thread award of 2014...
+1  Got to start early to get that early momentum going to carry you through to the awards show. =squeak= |
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
|
auzaar
|
|
February 01, 2014, 05:22:05 AM |
|
Does it matter if there are X or Y bitcoins in circulation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sonny
|
|
February 01, 2014, 06:31:55 AM |
|
It is only January yet we already have a candidate for the stupidest thread award of 2014...
+1 Got to start early to get that early momentum going to carry you through to the awards show. =squeak= lol  |
|
|
|
|
|
Squeaker
|
|
February 25, 2014, 07:03:37 PM
Last edit: February 25, 2014, 11:39:00 PM by Maged |
|
As much as I get annoyed at the fact that 66% of bitcoins are held by 2% of the users, stealing the bitcoins from them would hurt crypto currencies as a whole... the solution will come from new currencies that are distributed more fairly with new technologies that I believe will eventually replace bitcoin or at least supplement bitcoin. and who's definition of "fairness" do you suggest it gets modelled by? =squeak= |
"In order for you to insult me, I would first have to value your opinion." ~Anonymous |
|
|
aztecminer
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1000
|
|
February 25, 2014, 07:08:14 PM |
|
WHAT  if you dont use your bitcoins they will be destroyed ?! omg tell everybody! |
|
|
|
|
giszmo
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1105
WalletScrutiny.com
|
|
February 25, 2014, 10:29:09 PM |
|
OMG how can people get this wrong collectively. The suggestion would only require to confirm ownership every some years, not to spend them. This would be anonymous and will come anyway in a sense as soon as the current algos become unsafe.
|
| ɃɃWalletScrutiny.com | Is your wallet secure?(Methodology)
WalletScrutiny checks if wallet builds are reproducible, a precondition for code audits to be of value. | ɃɃ |
|
|
|
DannyHamilton
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3430
Merit: 4681
|
|
February 25, 2014, 10:38:38 PM |
|
OMG how can people get this wrong collectively. The suggestion would only require to confirm ownership every some years, not to spend them. This would be anonymous and will come anyway in a sense as soon as the current algos become unsafe.
Great. Problem solved. So can we stop worrying about it and move on to real problems now? |
|
|
|
|
|
Bralex
|
|
February 25, 2014, 10:57:05 PM |
|
How can bitcoin be destroy ?
|
|
|
|
justusranvier
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009
|
|
February 25, 2014, 11:14:16 PM |
|
OMG how can people get this wrong collectively. The suggestion would only require to confirm ownership every some years, not to spend them. This would be anonymous and will come anyway in a sense as soon as the current algos become unsafe. They aren't getting it wrong, they are just trying to concern troll their way towards a pump of some inflationary scamcoin-of-the-week. |
|
|
|
|
inoob
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 31
Merit: 0
|
|
February 25, 2014, 11:24:59 PM |
|
i'm a frickin noob, and i can tell without a shadow of a doubt THAT DESTROYING COINS NOT IN USE is the dumbest answer possible. i feel troll'd even responding to this.  |
|
|
|
|
|
zolace
|
|
April 11, 2014, 08:32:58 PM |
|
yeah if everyone gets together and detroy there coins then is possible but since we know and feel like its gold that wont happen
|
▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ |
|
|
bountygiver
Member
Offline
Activity: 100
Merit: 10
|
|
April 11, 2014, 10:40:42 PM |
|
When a coin is unused or lost it is not in circulation and therefore will increase the value of the rest of the coins due to scarcity.
|
12dXW87Hhz3gUsXDDCB8rjJPsWdQzjwnm6
|
|
|
jdun
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
April 12, 2014, 03:42:58 AM |
|
I've wondered that too. What happens when people lose their passwords, their hard drives crash, etc? Bitcoins inevitably will be lost, and when that happens they can never be recovered right? Eventually, a large portion of the bitcoin blockchain could become unusable?
|
|
|
|
|
oztusk
|
|
April 12, 2014, 03:52:14 AM |
|
unneeded complication. the vitality of economy consists of whatever coin IS in use, thereby regulating itself.
|
<<< "MY DOG ATE YOUR BITCOIN".. mtGox - - "MY DOG IS EATING YOUR BITCOIN"... Antpool - - "We were drinking espresso with shots of vodka at this little cafe. My laptop was on the table. This big dog came up behind us and,.. and..." ... nicehash ANTMINER is currently servicing 20-30% of the entire network hash rate. Enenatis. Quis interdum ac, aliquet nec est. www.bitmaintech.com Euismod risus sed, venenatis tellus. Aliquam vel. Spontaneous emission is not inherent to an emitter, but rather depends on its electromagnetic environment. "THE DOG ATE YOUR BITCOIN".. mtGox |
|
|
|
jparsley
|
|
April 12, 2014, 05:12:34 AM |
|
That would a bad idea for some. How would feel if u just found ur lost btc keys only to find u cant use ur btc.
|
please unban me.
|
|
|
|
