I don't thin Bitcoins will get rid of credit
Yes - this is a good point. Lets assume BTC was the primary global currency. People are still going to wish to purchase that for which they don't currently have enough BTC - so they are going to need credit.
And if they need credit they will be charged for that credit in some fashion by the creditor (ie. interest payments). Present day fractional reserve banking extends credit and has got us into this mess that BTC is to help us overcome.
But over time, how would BTC avoid creating credit and debt ?
Why wouldn't BTC banks develop along the same lines as existing ones ? I know that the money supply is fixed in BTC - but thats not to say that credit can't be generated off the back of it (promissory notes ?).
Surely this is where regulation comes in to it - Government regulation to prevent the dangerous and excessive FRB debacle (?) repeating over. However, regulation hasn't worked for fiat currencies - why would it work for BTC ? I know people will say that its precisely in the fact that BTC can't be regulated that its strength lay - but wouldn't zero regulation ultimately leave us back where we started ?
I know crowd funding/peer to peer lending is happening - but in a world where there are such huge disparities/inequalities in the distributions of wealth/power/opportunity those
with are always going to be much greater holders of BTC than those
without, so to speak.
I'm just thinking aloud here - and hoping someone can explain to me why this won't happen.