Bitcoin Forum
February 23, 2020, 11:07:08 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.0.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: [FUD] HALT ALL TRADING. VERY IMPORTANT INFO INSIDE (42)  (Read 1622 times)
jongameson
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 04:40:50 AM
Last edit: January 27, 2014, 04:03:01 PM by malevolent
 #1

apparently time is a "delusion" cause we are not all operating on Atomic Time.  please fix!!

19VAb9zAhpWLaWfEuqw9HXup2zaNoNPPyE
1582456028
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582456028

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582456028
Reply with quote  #2

1582456028
Report to moderator
1582456028
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1582456028

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1582456028
Reply with quote  #2

1582456028
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
BTC-TK
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 14


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 04:44:34 AM
 #2

In before the shitstorm....

EDIT: Seems that you've broadcasted the spending transaction before you received the BTC.

   ⚡⚡ PRiVCY ⚡⚡   ▂▃▅▆█ ✅ PRiVCY (PRIV) is a new PoW/PoS revolutionary privacy project ● ☞ ✅ Best privacy crypto-market! ● █▆▅▃▂
    Own Your Privacy! ─────────────────║ WebsiteGithub  |  Bitcointalk  |  Twitter  |  Discord  |  Explorer ║─────────────────
   ✯✯✯✯✯                 ✈✈✈[Free Airdrop - Starts 9th June]✅[Tor]✈✈✈ ║───────────║ Wallet ➢ ✓ Windows  |  ✓ macOS  |  ✓ Linux
msc
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 282
Merit: 250



View Profile
January 27, 2014, 04:47:21 AM
 #3

EDIT: Seems that you've broadcasted the spending transaction before you received the BTC.
I've seen that before, but usually for a shorter time span, I think.  But as long as it balances...
7Priest7
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 04:49:50 AM
 #4

Perhaps blockchain.info's cataloging methods are simply imperfect.

It all balances out though, no double spends, no free btc.

Somebody with a working version of armory mind checking the address?
yogi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 947
Merit: 1023


Hamster ate my bitcoin


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 05:03:33 AM
 #5

Looking at the timestamp the coins were recived before they were sent to another address. The order blockchain.info is showing thoses ttransacions is back-to-front.

User705
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1006


First 100% Liquid Stablecoin Backed by Gold


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 05:08:35 AM
 #6

It's showing in the same block though. 

theonewhowaskazu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 05:14:12 AM
 #7

Looking at the timestamp the coins were recived before they were sent to another address. The order blockchain.info is showing thoses ttransacions is back-to-front.

Either way, something is wrong. If you read it from top-to-bottom, the 3rd tx from the top should have resulted in a negative balance. If you read it bottom-to-top, then the 2nd TX from the top should have resulted in a negative balance.

Bobsurplus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008
Merit: 1000


Making money since I was in the womb! @emc2whale


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 05:14:52 AM
 #8

Looking at the timestamp the coins were recived before they were sent to another address. The order blockchain.info is showing thoses ttransacions is back-to-front.

Either way, something is wrong. If you read it from top-to-bottom, the 3rd tx from the top should have resulted in a negative balance. If you read it bottom-to-top, then the 2nd TX from the top should have resulted in a negative balance.

Just noticed this. How would this happen?
whtchocla7e
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 116


BBOD - The Best Crypto Derivatives Exchange


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 05:19:18 AM
 #9

Wow, that's pretty catastrophic. What's next, 1+1 = 3?

yogi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 947
Merit: 1023


Hamster ate my bitcoin


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 05:22:41 AM
 #10

Looking at the timestamp the coins were recived before they were sent to another address. The order blockchain.info is showing thoses ttransacions is back-to-front.

Either way, something is wrong. If you read it from top-to-bottom, the 3rd tx from the top should have resulted in a negative balance. If you read it bottom-to-top, then the 2nd TX from the top should have resulted in a negative balance.

Look at the time of the transactions, not the order blockchain.info is showing them in.

This is a problem with blockchain.info not bitcoin. So no need to worry.

BTC-TK
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 14


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 05:25:48 AM
 #11

The 2nd transaction from the top was created and broadcast (at the time invalid) before the address received the balance, this is possible, stop spreading FUD.

   ⚡⚡ PRiVCY ⚡⚡   ▂▃▅▆█ ✅ PRiVCY (PRIV) is a new PoW/PoS revolutionary privacy project ● ☞ ✅ Best privacy crypto-market! ● █▆▅▃▂
    Own Your Privacy! ─────────────────║ WebsiteGithub  |  Bitcointalk  |  Twitter  |  Discord  |  Explorer ║─────────────────
   ✯✯✯✯✯                 ✈✈✈[Free Airdrop - Starts 9th June]✅[Tor]✈✈✈ ║───────────║ Wallet ➢ ✓ Windows  |  ✓ macOS  |  ✓ Linux
kolev
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 94
Merit: 10

My name is Nikolay and am a webaholic.


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2014, 05:26:18 AM
 #12

http://blockr.io/address/info/19VAb9zAhpWLaWfEuqw9HXup2zaNoNPPyE shows something different.

Bitrated user: nikolay.
12648430
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 144
Merit: 100


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 06:19:11 AM
 #13

Timestamps are informational and not depended upon by the protocol. The clock of the computer that broadcast the spend from that address is a little ahead of the clock of the computer that spent into it. The same thing happens with block timestamps; blocks are often timestamped before the blocks they are built on. It is of no consequence. Nice thread title, lol.
theonewhowaskazu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 07:04:59 AM
 #14

Looking at the timestamp the coins were recived before they were sent to another address. The order blockchain.info is showing thoses ttransacions is back-to-front.

Either way, something is wrong. If you read it from top-to-bottom, the 3rd tx from the top should have resulted in a negative balance. If you read it bottom-to-top, then the 2nd TX from the top should have resulted in a negative balance.

Look at the time of the transactions, not the order blockchain.info is showing them in.

This is a problem with blockchain.info not bitcoin. So no need to worry.

Yes, you're probably right, esp. because blockr.io is showing something different. Didn't notice the timestamps. However, just to dig a bit deeper, maybe there isn't something wrong with the protocol, but perhaps there is something wrong (or at least, unintuitive) with the client?

Blockchain.info probably runs some Bitcoind variant, right?
Maybe bitcoind listtransactions command is causing the transactions to get listed out of order?

Phinnaeus Gage
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1112


Bitcoin: An Idea Worth Spending


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2014, 08:25:49 AM
 #15

Looking at the timestamp the coins were recived before they were sent to another address. The order blockchain.info is showing thoses ttransacions is back-to-front.

Either way, something is wrong. If you read it from top-to-bottom, the 3rd tx from the top should have resulted in a negative balance. If you read it bottom-to-top, then the 2nd TX from the top should have resulted in a negative balance.

Look at the time of the transactions, not the order blockchain.info is showing them in.

This is a problem with blockchain.info not bitcoin. So no need to worry.

Unless you have tens of thousands in blockchain wallets?

I guess that explains why a handful of bitcoiners stated to me privately that they're no longer using blockchain.info wallets. This sucks, for I'm getting InstaWallet flashbacks of which, luckily, is in the process of being resolved... but not again!

IAO Launchpad Coming Soon
Analyticse
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
January 27, 2014, 02:42:10 PM
 #16

some guys know prognose for future btc
if you know say for our studio guys bitcoin scene internacionals i am interest
vervolioman
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 493
Merit: 500



View Profile
January 27, 2014, 03:04:33 PM
 #17

Wow, that's pretty catastrophic. What's next, 1+1 = 3?

I doubt it is catastrophic, every user has bit different time on his computer, so unavoidable to happen. All you need to do is use different way to showing transactions, not based on time only but in what order these transaction can happen as well

What use is a signature?
Sonny
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868
Merit: 1000


View Profile
January 27, 2014, 03:57:08 PM
 #18

Wow, that's pretty catastrophic. What's next, 1+1 = 3?

I don't really get that.
The tx time is wrong, and the transactions are arranged according to the faulty timestamp.
What is catastrophic here?
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!