[ANN] DelosMiner for nVidia GPUs by TeamDelos

[entinio]

Still no love for a linux version ?

[Quake4]

This is joke?

11:10 start
11:45 fee
12:18 fee
12:52 fee
13:25 fee
13:58 fee

1 min 15 sec - 30 min
x % fee - 100 %

x = 1.25 * 100 / 30 = 4,1666666666666666666666666666667

Real dev fee is above 4%!!!

[mo35]

This is joke?

11:10 start
11:45 fee
12:18 fee
12:52 fee
13:25 fee
13:58 fee

1 min 15 sec - 30 min
x % fee - 100 %

x = 1.25 * 100 / 30 = 4,1666666666666666666666666666667

Real dev fee is above 4%!!!

i was wondering about same , why my workers so often getting jerked off my pool ...

[josywong]

This is joke?

11:10 start
11:45 fee
12:18 fee
12:52 fee
13:25 fee
13:58 fee

1 min 15 sec - 30 min
x % fee - 100 %

x = 1.25 * 100 / 30 = 4,1666666666666666666666666666667

Real dev fee is above 4%!!!

i removed right after it made 1st connection during benchmark phase. 240sec interval only. dev fee connect wayyy too early.
reinitialized gpu during benchmarking x16r even devfee connecting to x16r.

[Quake4]

fee above 4% in version 1.3.0

[boomboommin]

LoL.
ccminer 2.2.5=this miner. just some color modding.
it is just feeminer for dev. ahahaha

[TeamDelos]

DelosMiner v1.3.0 is released!

Change log:

    Performance boosts on LYRA2v2, Skein and x16r!
    Additional core speed improvements of up to 2% for most algos.
    Revised dev fee mechanism for a seemless mining experience.

Thanks for the update. The optimizations to Lyra2v2 are much appreciated.  I have small suggest concerning the dev fee mechanism, however. Would you consider hiding the accepted results and hash rate messages when the miner is working on the dev pool?  The issue is that if you are trying to do any calculations based on those numbers, the results from the dev pool work can skew the averages. Since the dev pool work doesn't correspond to the user's work, it would be preferable to hide performance messages related to the dev pool. Thanks for considering my suggestion.

i strongly support this , just simple "starting devfee mining" and "finishing mining devfee" messages should be sufficient for thos who want to see time stamps or whatsnot

Thanks a lot for your suggestions!

We take these ideas serious, and we'll enable more logging with this next release, so you'll be able to see exactly when devfee happens.

Please let us also know on which algos you'd like to see more efforts...

[entinio]

No hashrates data ?

[jebidia]

Would be great to see lrya2z get some love.   Would you please address the dev fee posts above.   They are bogus or not?

[TeamDelos]

DelosMiner v1.3.0a is released!

Change log:

    Logging: shows pool switching (as suggested on bitcointalk)

Enjoy!

[notsure85]

lyra2z would be great indeed.
Also upcoming phi2 after luxcoin fork

[The_Crypto_Pirate]

Why all this FUD?

DelosMiner has 1% dev fee and that's really fair! Using it on my rigs without any issues.

I'd also love to see PHI2 being added.

Cheers

[Xazax310]

Tried the miner, Hashrates seem be very good, but when It switched to DevFee I got this error https://img.techpowerup.org/180610/dealosteamminer.png, running CUDA 9.1 1.30a

[Katimand]

Why all this FUD?

DelosMiner has 1% dev fee and that's really fair! Using it on my rigs without any issues.

I'd also love to see PHI2 being added.

Cheers

So why others say 4% fee?

[domora]

Why all this FUD?

DelosMiner has 1% dev fee and that's really fair! Using it on my rigs without any issues.

I'd also love to see PHI2 being added.

Cheers

So why others say 4% fee?

An earlier version obviosly did not have a proper dev fee logging.

This however changed with the latest release (1.3.0a).

[josywong]

Why all this FUD?

DelosMiner has 1% dev fee and that's really fair! Using it on my rigs without any issues.

I'd also love to see PHI2 being added.

Cheers

So why others say 4% fee?

the dev fee is not random. always start at around 3min. this hurt profit switching users, consider it as 25%+ dev fee for them

[slim6y]

```There have been several reports now of people having their wallets hacked after downloading Delosminer. The wallets auto transfer maximum funds out to hackers address once amounts of 5k - 10k are met. Anyone who has downloaded it already should transfer all funds to another wallet and clean install OS, burning the original wallet.dat. Delosminer is obviously communicating with wallets after downloading. Issue persists even after removing miner. Recommended miner for x16s/x16r is z-enemy.```

Found at the discord channel of REEF.

Can someone explain?

[Regulater]

```There have been several reports now of people having their wallets hacked after downloading Delosminer. The wallets auto transfer maximum funds out to hackers address once amounts of 5k - 10k are met. Anyone who has downloaded it already should transfer all funds to another wallet and clean install OS, burning the original wallet.dat. Delosminer is obviously communicating with wallets after downloading. Issue persists even after removing miner. Recommended miner for x16s/x16r is z-enemy.```

Found at the discord channel of REEF.

Can someone explain?

This is actually correct. The miner has a virus, and after hitting a certain goal that it logs from the pool, it will auto transfer all funds from your wallet or transfer your private keys. This has been posted all over the x16 discords, and its not bias due to closed source as other trusting closed source miners have not been truly accused with proof.

Also confirmed to be using Nevermore for X16 algos without any contributions or acknowledgement to the original creators and breaking opensource laws.

[slim6y]

Doesn't encrypting your wallet prevent this from occurring?

What you mean by this?

"Also confirmed to be using Nevermore for X16 algos without any contributions or acknowledgement to the original creators and breaking opensource laws."

[malthrax]

Doesn't encrypting your wallet prevent this from occurring?

yes, that would prevent this from happening, as long as your wallet is not "unlocked".

What you mean by this?

"Also confirmed to be using Nevermore for X16 algos without any contributions or acknowledgement to the original creators and breaking opensource laws."

Armchair lawyer thinks shrink-wrap software licenses are legally binding world-wide.  Nothing to see here.