[ANN] < pNut > XPM base, CPU mining ONLY < Windows & MacOSX Wallet Released !

[zzhangq]

Code:

addnode=176.31.160.138
addnode=176.31.160.141
addnode=78.30.234.229:25884
addnode=117.214.168.101:25884
addnode=134.119.3.19:25884
addnode=188.138.109.174:25884
addnode=192.81.217.82:25884
addnode=176.31.160.138
addnode=176.31.160.141

These work

mining
thanks

[rorbit]

Is this coin dead?

The windows wallet won't synch.  It says no block source available.

[GordonSSS]

pNut --> 8

pNut is rare,
pNut is fast,
pNut is for all,
pNut is ecologist,
pNut is wonderful,
that's crazy.

...
pNut is no different from PrimeCoin,
pNut is absolutely fucking pointless,
etc.

[erazor2k]

pnut up and working!

why not use a working altcoin!!

[niothor]

Shopping for coins , and looking for coins that have stayed below radar but still active as a dev and community , is there still something going on?

[niothor]

I'm checking all the forum for coins , with low activity , but not already dead.  Too bad 4 this one.

[erazor2k]

I'm checking all the forum for coins , with low activity , but not already dead.  Too bad 4 this one.

{
    "version" : "v0.1.2.1-unk-beta",
    "protocolversion" : 75001,
    "walletversion" : 60000,
    "blocks" : 152054,
    "moneysupply" : 814662.81000000,
    "timeoffset" : -305,
    "connections" : 18,
    "proxy" : "",
    "testnet" : false,
    "keypoololdest" : 1395045704,
    "keypoolsize" : 101,
    "paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
    "errors" : ""
}

coin still alive and very stable...we need an exchange...sources also available so we can continue development
by ourself is neccesary

[annpaol]

The dev go away for eToken and now also this one is not properly alive. This is an interesting coin but there is need of more people interested in.

[dE_logics]

pNut --> 8

pNut is rare,
pNut is fast,
pNut is for all,
pNut is ecologist,
pNut is wonderful,
that's crazy.

...
pNut is no different from PrimeCoin,
pNut is absolutely fucking pointless,
etc.

And how's DOGE different than litecoin?

[AndBerg]

Existing blockchain explorer or coin dead now?

[pembo210]

...don't know. I was hoping for more prime based coins.
edit: words..     I had high hopes for this one

[jparsley]

Will try to mine this coin

[biteboy]

I am confused. You say in the first post that there is no premine, yet the first block has a reward of 1000 that you said went to yourself.

That means it is premined.

[alphaHome]

pity that pNut is now dead.

[gjhiggins]

pity that pNut is now dead.

Whaddya mean by "dead"?

Code:

getpeerinfo
[
{
"addr" : "5.9.56.229:25884",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1402163113,
"lastrecv" : 1402163115,
"bytessent" : 63791,
"bytesrecv" : 727007,
"conntime" : 1402144816,
"version" : 75001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 383651,
"banscore" : 0,
"syncnode" : true
},
{
"addr" : "31.6.70.196:25884",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1402163115,
"lastrecv" : 1402163115,
"bytessent" : 220829,
"bytesrecv" : 268338,
"conntime" : 1402144828,
"version" : 75001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 383652,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "144.76.57.52:25884",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1402163115,
"lastrecv" : 1402163115,
"bytessent" : 315946,
"bytesrecv" : 241934,
"conntime" : 1402144840,
"version" : 75001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 383652,
"banscore" : 0
},
{
"addr" : "78.46.200.118:25884",
"services" : "00000001",
"lastsend" : 1402163115,
"lastrecv" : 1402163115,
"bytessent" : 249478,
"bytesrecv" : 430667,
"conntime" : 1402144840,
"version" : 75001,
"subver" : "/Satoshi:0.8.6/",
"inbound" : false,
"startingheight" : 383652,
"banscore" : 0
}
]

Code:

getmininginfo
{
"blocks" : 384279,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : true,
"genproclimit" : 1,
"primespersec" : 308,
"chainsperday" : 170.12825865,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}

Does that fall within the scope of your definition?

Cheers,

Graham

[Coinscious]

pity that pNut is now dead.

Whaddya mean by "dead"?

Code:

...

Does that fall within the scope of your definition?

Cheers,

Graham

No exchanges, no attention, no support, no block explorer, no dev, 0 value... Yes, it's dead.

[gjhiggins]

No exchanges, no attention, no support, no block explorer, no dev, 0 value... Yes, it's dead.

Sincere thanks for taking the trouble to contribute to a potential definition of "dead". I'm hoping to develop further my understanding of the mental models that people construct and it's a reasonably reliable phenomenon that definitions nearly always raise interesting and useful questions, the answers to which often shed light on the underlying assumptions and semantic associations.

From your post, I receive confirmation of my otherwise tentative conclusion that a characterisation of exchanges is required; any old exchange won't necessarily be acceptable so clearly there are further details to be elicited.

Pretty much the same goes for "attention" and "support"; both are quite widely-used terms but there is no corresponding widely-agreed consensus of what they actually mean (at least in terms of motivating the generation of an answer specific to pNut).

Thanks to your post, I'm now prompted to go away and consider "attention from whom" and "what kind of attention". Generating useful definitions of "support" and "dev" that will be comprehensible to the technically uninformed presents a tough challenge and neither have a trivial solution.

As for "value", I'm going to treat that as a user-supplied function for which the parameters and contextual attributes are beyond characterisation.

Thanks again.

Cheers

Graham