ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 10, 2011, 08:24:30 PM |
|
The question of where bitcoins get their value has been chewing at the back of my brain for a while now. Yes, I know speculation and dollars invested gives it value, as do the goods you can buy with them. However, as long as dollars remain a more convenient alternative, I think the general public will be slow to adopt bitcoins. This low adoption rate will likely keep the value of the bitcoin down.
If we can find a "killer app" for bitcoins, a commodity that can only be bought through bitcoins, then we will have effectively ensured demand for bitcoins will remain at least as high as demand for that commodity. I hear the US uses oil for this purpose, though I haven't researched that claim at all. This commodity would, of course, have to be unique to our own "nation;" that is, our bitcoin community.
The collective computing power of our network is phenomenal. There are a massive number of GPUs and GPU clusters grinding away to create new bitcoins every day. But what if it were more profitable to pool together our resources and rent them in exchange for bitcoins? We would be selling bitcoins to people only to have them give those coins back to us later, and at potentially a higher price than we might have earned by mining those bitcoins. After all, we are more efficient than any of the commercial clustering services out there and our margins could potentially be high. How many of you have tried looking for a clustering service only to find they were all priced too high to be profitable for you?
And, of course, if mining ends up being more profitable because of bitcoin deflation as a result, it would be a small matter to devote more of our nodes to mining again until the situation reverses again. At the very least it would establish a way for us to earn some good money with our mining boxes once all the bitcoins have been mined.
As a network we are faster, more efficient, and much more powerful than any other clustering service I've come across. Computing power is a commodity and we have a ton.
What do you all think? Am I on to anything?
|
|
|
|
kiba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
|
|
March 10, 2011, 08:40:28 PM |
|
What kind of uses do people have for giant GPU clusters?
|
|
|
|
ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 10, 2011, 08:47:22 PM |
|
Protein folding, prime number finding, DNA analysis, data mining. Lots of research applications, from what I understand. Anything involving lots of parallelizable computation would stand to benefit, really.
|
|
|
|
kiba
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1020
|
|
March 10, 2011, 08:49:51 PM |
|
Protein folding, prime number finding, DNA analysis, data mining. Lots of research applications, from what I understand. Anything involving lots of parallelizable computation would stand to benefit, really.
Who would pay for these research?
|
|
|
|
curator
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
March 10, 2011, 09:23:13 PM |
|
I want to echo what Kiba says here. Protein folding et al. already have a huge volunteer following, and that takes the profitability away. I'm mulling over other solutions so I'm not a total negative Nan... ::think, think, think::
|
|
|
|
ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 10, 2011, 09:29:10 PM |
|
Universities and biotech startups, I imagine. Not sure. I'd have to do some research to find out. The same people using the Amazon GPU cloud and Sabalcore's clusters, essentially. There are businesses out there already doing this, so it seems there's a market for it. But like I said, all the clusters-for-rent I've come across so far consist mostly of crappy NVIDIA-based boxes. Our network contains nodes of a much higher quality.
|
|
|
|
gusti
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1099
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 10, 2011, 10:42:54 PM |
|
|
If you don't own the private keys, you don't own the coins.
|
|
|
ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 10, 2011, 11:47:41 PM |
|
Interesting. Yeah, that's always a possibility when you start renting out computing resources. Here are the specs on what you get for $2.10 an hour with Amazon: Cluster GPU Quadruple Extra Large Instance 22 GB of memory 33.5 EC2 Compute Units (2 x Intel Xeon X5570, quad-core “Nehalem” architecture) 2 x NVIDIA Tesla “Fermi” M2050 GPUs 1690 GB of instance storage 64-bit platform I/O Performance: Very High (10 Gigabit Ethernet) API name: cg1.4xlarge This is their most expensive and powerful offering. I had been focusing on the GPU aspect of that particular product. I just noticed it also gets you 67 CPUs. Here's the pricing schedule for Sabalcore: http://ryepdx.com/SCI-pricing_schedule_2011c.pdfAlso their user guide: http://ryepdx.com/SabalcoreUserGuide.pdf
|
|
|
|
ScriptGadget
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2011, 12:25:10 AM |
|
If we can find a "killer app" for bitcoins, a commodity that can only be bought through bitcoins, then we will have effectively ensured demand for bitcoins will remain at least as high as demand for that commodity. I hear the US uses oil for this purpose, though I haven't researched that claim at all. This commodity would, of course, have to be unique to our own "nation;" that is, our bitcoin community.
+1 This is exactly what I've been thinking. Paying in bitcoin for online resources makes alot of sense. Also, this can also help secure bitcoin against propaganda "whitchunts" by the powers that be. I remember a great presentation at a conference I went to once, about Cute Kitten Activism, this was long before the Facebook revolutions. The presenter described their experiences with a photo posting site and how they knew they were functional when people posted kitten photos, they knew they could scale when people posted porn, and they knew they were in over their heads when activists were using them to organize and to document atrocities in real time. What they found was that the kittens made the site too politically costly for the network to block. Governments have gotten a bit bolder since, but it hasn't worked out well for them. I like your idea, but we also need a "Cute Kitten" app, something so obviously popular and non-threatening that people will be as eager to join the Bitcoin economy as they are to spend their baby formula money to buy power-ups in a Zynga app. http://imagepaste.nullnetwork.net/img/1299802637feel_teh_powerz_small.jpg
|
|
|
|
|
gohan
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 1
|
|
March 11, 2011, 12:50:02 AM |
|
Universities and biotech startups, I imagine.
Don't forget finance industry. There is no limit to the computing resources they can utilize.
|
|
|
|
ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 11, 2011, 02:38:16 AM |
|
Universities and biotech startups, I imagine.
Don't forget finance industry. There is no limit to the computing resources they can utilize. Get the finance industry renting time on mining boxes? That would be awesome. I think I would crap myself. One million internets to the person who pulls that off! :-D
|
|
|
|
ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 11, 2011, 02:50:59 AM |
|
Also, this can also help secure bitcoin against propaganda "whitchunts" by the powers that be. I remember a great presentation at a conference I went to once, about Cute Kitten Activism, this was long before the Facebook revolutions. [...] What they found was that the kittens made the site too politically costly for the network to block. Governments have gotten a bit bolder since, but it hasn't worked out well for them.
I like your idea, but we also need a "Cute Kitten" app, something so obviously popular and non-threatening that people will be as eager to join the Bitcoin economy as they are to spend their baby formula money to buy power-ups in a Zynga app.
+1 I'm not so much into the money laundering and illegal filesharing applications that I've seen going on for that very reason. Those seem like "Anti Cute Kitten" apps. If bitcoins become synonymous with shady dealings, the government will be much more likely to try taking down the network and, failing that, destroy the credibility of our currency with the public so that the coins become virtually useless. While it's nigh impossible to take down a good-sized p2p network, it's quite possible to forestall an idea's acceptance by the mainstream. Ha. Maybe I should just make a kitten photo site and incorporate bitcoins somehow. :-D
|
|
|
|
ScriptGadget
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 49
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2011, 07:43:34 AM |
|
Ha. Maybe I should just make a kitten photo site and incorporate bitcoins somehow. :-D
Do it!
|
|
|
|
ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 11, 2011, 07:51:33 AM |
|
Ha. Maybe I should just make a kitten photo site and incorporate bitcoins somehow. :-D
Do it! Maaaybe. First I want to finish the other bitcoin-related web app I'm working on. Then we'll see what I can do about the kittens...
|
|
|
|
gohan
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 52
Merit: 1
|
|
March 11, 2011, 09:21:09 AM |
|
Get the finance industry renting time on mining boxes? That would be awesome. I think I would crap myself. One million internets to the person who pulls that off! :-D
Why not? We only need to market it together with an easily usable framework (like BOINC but with some p2p features maybe?). We have time though, until OpenCL catches up with at least the present state of CUDA. OTOH mining is becoming less profitable, so it should be done before people stops paying attention.
|
|
|
|
barbarousrelic
|
|
March 11, 2011, 04:36:51 PM |
|
Two words: Online poker.
This was enormous in the US until the Feds stopped people from being able to collect their winnings through credit cards.
|
Do not waste your time debating whether Bitcoin can work. It does work.
"Early adopters will profit" is not a sufficient condition to classify something as a pyramid or Ponzi scheme. If it was, Apple and Microsoft stock are Ponzi schemes.
There is no such thing as "market manipulation." There is only buying and selling.
|
|
|
ryepdx (OP)
|
|
March 11, 2011, 06:59:08 PM |
|
Two words: Online poker.
This was enormous in the US until the Feds stopped people from being able to collect their winnings through credit cards.
Not a bad idea... Sounds like something that could grow the bitcoin economy until we get enough physical density to start introducing our local supermarkets to it.
|
|
|
|
genjix
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1076
|
|
March 11, 2011, 07:13:19 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
curator
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
March 11, 2011, 07:45:58 PM |
|
Nice! Way to be proactive!
|
|
|
|
|