cgminer - bfgminer hashrate comparison

[trubar]

I mine LTC with GPU.
When i mine with cgminer I get the same hashrate as on pool dashboard (approximate 170Kh/s). But when I mine with bfgminer my hashrate is much bigger (approximate 1.2 Mk/h). That is 7 ime more that it should be. Cgminer hashrate according to https://litecoin.info/Mining_hardware_comparison is correct. What is wrong? Is this ok?

[drr0ss]

Hi,
Just for testing, I try to dig with bfgminer, however not see any advantage with bfgminer yet.
Nor in pool stat, nor in commandline stats.
On terminal screen I see little slow digging with bfgminer, 2-3 kh. slow:)

[trubar]

So bfgminer just show wrong hashrate for script minig?

[drr0ss]

I think no.
More time is needed for observations.
Rather, pay attention to whether a cgminer has more or less rejected shares.
There are many factors that affect performance.
These indicators are never objective.
One comes out on the calculator in coinwarez, another is real obtained yields.
Exaple, if your bfg miner have 0 rejected shares for the perriod, however displayed 700 ks, the speed is 700 kh.
If cgminer have 2% rejected shares on similar period of time, however displayed 710 kh, the real speed is lower.
The pool will display 710 khs, but coins extractions is lower.
However note, that displayed speed in terminal  is not the speed of the coins extraction
+-10khs does not matter
Just keep digging