|
studio1one
|
 |
January 31, 2014, 09:37:14 AM |
|
I'm pretty sure its because of the amount of stale and discarded shares, which are due to hardware errors. You also have a high amount of get fails at 10%. These figures are massively higher than I get.
I'm at a bit of a loss here to be honest, maybe someone else can chip in. The only thing I can see that looks like it could be causing it is that your temp is a little on the high side, these really need to be kept cool, where have you got the miner?
We keep ours in an unheated cargo loading area and they never get over around 42 degrees.
|
| BINTEX | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| | | |
●
●
●
●
●
●
●
| |
Powered by,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each block is stacked on top of the previous one. Adding another block to the top makes all lower blocks more difficult to remove: there is more "weight" above each block. A transaction in a block 6 blocks deep (6 confirmations) will be very difficult to remove.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
marcbuster
Newbie
 Offline
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 11:59:24 AM |
|
Where did you get the clone? Just curious...  |
|
|
|
|
|
samsonn25
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:48:31 PM |
|
Thats alot of stale shares!
I have 4 ants mining now, 14 hours 9000-14000 shares each and not even 1 stale.
|
|
|
|
|
stephenm (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 03:53:45 PM |
|
thanks for the input guys.
bought it directly from the manufacturer in China.
I'll contact them to have it replaced/fixed/whatever.
there is definitely something I tried all my other miners on the same pool and not a single one of them is more than 1-2% off the hashing speed spec.
my temperatures are a little higher than what some of you have been running but I don't see how this could explain it. heck, they even recommend a target temp of 50C.
|
|
|
|
|
stephenm (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 04:39:06 PM |
|
Are these numbers what gives an idea of the number of errors?
(17 hours 35 mn)
LocalWork: 2,870,281
DiffA: 2,050,944
DiffR: 29,824
DiffS: 729,728
|
|
|
|
|
stephenm (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
January 31, 2014, 10:07:46 PM |
|
odd - cgminer status now says the btcguild server is dead.
I thought it was another problem with this unit but I just added the btcdig info again and it's connecting/hashing fine with btcdig.
my other miner on btcguild is still working fine though. like I said - odd.
|
|
|
|
|
stephenm (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
February 06, 2014, 10:55:31 PM |
|
upping this one last time in case some had an idea?
no matter stock or o/c'ed to 1400 it's hashing with a ratio (DiffS / Local Work) of 12-15% no matter either pool (only tried BTCguild and BTCdig).
API log shows very consistent numbers throughout the 16 miners (all within 1% of each other).
Local hashing rate (Cgminer status page) is on spec (200 stock) - (215/220 @ 1400).
|
|
|
|
|
stephenm (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 37
Merit: 0
|
|
February 12, 2014, 04:12:28 AM |
|
in case anyone is interested, I fixed the problem by using a stratum proxy  220 GH/s locally and on pool side |
|
|
|
|
mehdi343
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 08:04:01 AM |
|
How did you fix it by proxy? can you explain more?
|
|
|
|
|
mehdi343
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 29
Merit: 0
|
|
March 02, 2014, 09:59:00 PM |
|
in case anyone is interested, I fixed the problem by using a stratum proxy 220 GH/s locally and on pool side Would you please tell me how did you fix it? I have the same problem. Anybody knows how to fix with proxy? |
|
|
|
|
|
