Nearly every single interview I've seen him in is with some dumb female reporter whose every reply is an obvious strawman. He's used to it though, and knows exactly how to respond.
Her strawman in this case was (pp) "You think Bitcoin is better than the dollar?" when his actual argument was (pp) "I support competition in regards to forms of money, and bitcoin is an example of this competition, therefore, I support it."
But see how there is a big difference between what he said, and "better than the dollar?" Too bad most people have absolutely 0 critical thinking ability.
True. I am just glad the conversation is being had at all. Its alot of smoke and mirrors in this interview. Theyre basically trying to give him questions which could make him say something to their favor. Like you said though. He is use to it.
