Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 04:34:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 2014-01-30 Bloomberg - Bitcoin Needs Tighter Rules Than Banks, Say Prosecutors  (Read 787 times)
Denton (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 100



View Profile
January 30, 2014, 09:57:40 PM
 #1

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-29/prosecutor-warns-of-wild-west-without-bitcoin-oversight.html

Quote
Virtual-currency firms should face regulations that are tougher than those for established financial-services providers because of their ability to hide criminal activity, according to law enforcement officials.

“Without stronger government oversight, we are allowing cybercriminals, identity thieves, traffickers of child pornography, and other malevolent actors to operate in a digital Wild West,” Cyrus Vance Jr., the district attorney for Manhattan, said at a hearing yesterday about possible state regulation of digital currencies.

1714106079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714106079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714106079
Reply with quote  #2

1714106079
Report to moderator
1714106079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714106079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714106079
Reply with quote  #2

1714106079
Report to moderator
1714106079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714106079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714106079
Reply with quote  #2

1714106079
Report to moderator
Remember that Bitcoin is still beta software. Don't put all of your money into BTC!
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714106079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714106079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714106079
Reply with quote  #2

1714106079
Report to moderator
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2348


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
January 30, 2014, 10:37:41 PM
 #2

Yawn ...

... wouldn't it be great if people had to actually know what they were talking about before being asked to speak publicly? BTW what does it mean when someone puts "Jr." after their name, Jerk?

BitDreams
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 503
Merit: 501



View Profile
January 30, 2014, 11:41:50 PM
 #3

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-29/prosecutor-warns-of-wild-west-without-bitcoin-oversight.html

Quote
Virtual-currency firms should face regulations that are tougher than those for established financial-services providers because of their ability to hide criminal activity, according to law enforcement officials.

“Without stronger government oversight, we are allowing cybercriminals, identity thieves, traffickers of child pornography, and other malevolent actors to operate in a digital Wild West,” Cyrus Vance Jr., the district attorney for Manhattan, said at a hearing yesterday about possible state regulation of digital currencies.

Give them every single rule their non-bankster-prosecuting hearts desire and with a smile upon our collective faces for ultimately, Bitcoin is self-regulating.
thezerg
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1010


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 05:22:33 PM
 #4

Yawn ...

... wouldn't it be great if people had to actually know what they were talking about before being asked to speak publicly? BTW what does it mean when someone puts "Jr." after their name, Jerk?


...Jr. (junior) means their father has the same name.
Entropy-uc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 501


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 05:44:23 PM
 #5

Every bitcoin article on bloomberg/businessweek should be read with "We hate bitcoin and," added to the beginning.

Once you read it that way they all start to make sense.
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2607


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 07:54:42 PM
 #6

Since when do the banks and banksters play by the rules anyway?

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
cr1776
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4018
Merit: 1299


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 07:56:57 PM
 #7

Yawn ...

... wouldn't it be great if people had to actually know what they were talking about before being asked to speak publicly? BTW what does it mean when someone puts "Jr." after their name, Jerk?

They used to say (even though it is not always true, but still funny):  "Jerk = Junior Educated Rick Kid". 
Gabi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 1008


If you want to walk on water, get out of the boat


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 08:16:18 PM
 #8

And no tigher rules for HSBC??  Roll Eyes

OneEyedJack
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 08:37:29 PM
 #9

Tighter than banks? Really?
Money laundering has been going on for a very long time, and whether it's cash or bitcoins it will still happen.
I see 2 sides to this coin though and they are both against bitcoin, but fighting each other on the same fight:

1) One side says that bitcoins are dangerous because they can be used for illegal purposes (which by the way you can do with cash, or any item that has value)
2) The second side (mind you they are both batting for the same team) say that every transaction is traceable because of the blockchain. I.E. Silkroad

So which is it folks. Are you scared or not? Make up your mind. Dangerous or a dream come true.

All donations are given to the Universal DBDB Organization
EAC: egokwQAmnNvumsQfMokeV2qKRgJdARY4D4
GRA: 9ECPZJBtbMHyfGikdUzQuf9Z8t6gGbWh5s
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2607


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
January 31, 2014, 09:20:00 PM
 #10

And no tigher rules for HSBC??  Roll Eyes

Not when you've got billions to buy your way out of jail.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!