Most of the current projects would be more suited to centralised databases ( his opinion ).
Do you think the reason behind Ripple and Stellar being centralized, is due to data-management or due to reserving greater amount of control?
I personally think, that despite being a security risk and not fully decentralized as I understand, projects like Ripple might got it right. In some cases it makes sense to be a gatekeeper for limiting access to a blockchain. Imagine you would start to catalogue (e.g.) historical sites (..random
), requiring a tiny amount of information about their historical origin, their location and maybe an image of the site (building, structure etc.). Wouldn´t it be preferable to let Archeologist deploy / input this information through a Gatekeeper, before it becomes accessible to the community and stored for future generations?