I can't fully agree with you, mate. Croatia played well in the group stage matches especially the famous one vs Argentina, but in the knockout games their performance was bland at best. They got lucky 3 times in a row. France were dominating their opponents with ease and left them no chances to fight back. Actually Croatia had an easier knockout bracket than France. Do you think Croatia would have beaten Argentina twice and then Uruguay and Belgium? No they wouldn't have. But France did all that in regulation time. As for the 2 disputable goals, I don't think the referee was biased plus he received instructions over the VAR so he couldn't have been solely responsible for those calls. The final should have been France - Belgium full stop. The 2 best teams on this World Cup.
You underestimate Denmark.
Denmark was undefeated for 20 games or so when they played Croatia.
They played 0:0 with France too..
I'd say Croatia was unlucky rather then lucky
I mean just look at this
https://youtu.be/5_iIW2DZ8nc?t=1m7sUghh, not really
The France - Argentina match was tense till the end
I watched it 1-0, 2-1, 4-3, Argentina was able to get back any time during the game, and they were pressing the 2nd half really well
Yes, I think it would.
"Dominating with ease" haha
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6C6oOcDFmLYIt was pretty tense
You're saying Belgium is the 2nd best team
But be realistic
If Croatia played that match against Japan
You'd say, how can Croatia deserve the finals when they played so bad against Japan xD
All the posts I've seen from you in various threads are just attacking Croatia for some reason o.o
They deserved to be there, they have the best player in the cup and the most attractive football!