delete

+1 Sounds good. Are we starting over or keeping the block chain in tact?

I suggest we start over given that he has coins on the current/original block chain that I'm sure we would all like to have invalidated.

SC 1.04 becomes BEXcoin.

lawl.

our Solidcoin 2.0 with 1 million pre-mined coins and a TAX.

well you need to remove this coins, but how do you know in which blocks it is

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on September 17, 2011, 01:04:28 AM

Quote from: Cosbycoin on September 17, 2011, 01:00:23 AM

I can invalidate the inserted 1000 blocks between 29000 and 30000. I've analyzed the block chain and it doesn't appear that he has too many others as best i can tell. This way all the people get to keep their coins.

Throw ideas out, this is the "Think Tank"

WEll if they choose to use your chain and CH's then they get twice the coins which is absurd.

We may as well restart it and call it BCXcoin and be done with it.

Start over.

invite me with my 25Ghash when your pool are ready. h

Solidcoin my ass!!
Don't do that with yourself man... Just my ฿0.02... LOL Grin

Quote from: ThiagoCMC on September 17, 2011, 01:14:16 AM

Solidcoin my ass!!
Don't do that with yourself man... Just my ฿0.02... LOL Grin

You are so anti-alt-chain man. You forget that we are gaining mch valuable info for bitcoin itself by testing these smaller chains.

If you feel like it BCX, however this grants me the privilege to bash you down hard as soon as you try to:

a) Add "phoony" blocks like those 10K
b) Input pre-magically-generated 1 M coins
c) Come to say I must call your junk by "SC", "BC" or something alike - I'll call it as I see it suits

Other than that... be happy.

I don't see the point of continuing SC when GG is up and running. Faster blocks, faster difficulty adjustments, faster implementation of bug fixes, etc.

Quote from: Syke on September 17, 2011, 01:24:34 AM

I don't see the point of continuing SC when GG is up and running. Faster blocks, faster difficulty adjustments, faster implementation of bug fixes, etc.

Dilution of the cryptocurrencies.

Quote from: Cosbycoin on September 17, 2011, 01:17:09 AM

Quote from: ThiagoCMC on September 17, 2011, 01:14:16 AM

Solidcoin my ass!!
Don't do that with yourself man... Just my ฿0.02... LOL Grin

You are so anti-alt-chain man. You forget that we are gaining mch valuable info for bitcoin itself by testing these smaller chains.

I agree with you on this.

Alt-chains is a good thing, no doubt.

I just do not agree with the way you guys are doing this... It is so infantile... Using of defamation and lies to promote yourself by saying that the Bitcoin collapse is emminent, and that solidcoin is safe against 51% mining power, etc and etc... Tsc.. tsc...

This is not the way a real man should act.

This is the way that kids do playing around.

Look! My dick is bigger than yours!! Oh crap...

Sorry, but you guys from Solid Coin, shooted in your own feet.

It could be called BitcoinEXpress' SolidCoin (BSC for short Wink

)

Solidcoin seems very liquid right now...

Quote from: Lumpy on September 17, 2011, 01:49:01 AM

It could be called BitcoinEXpress' SolidCoin (BSC for short Wink

)

BSC sounds OK, actually we could start to name these alt-chains BSC (BullShitCoin), YaBSC(Yet another BullShitCoin)...

Actually if I would get to something in these grounds would be totally different than bitcoin.

Here's a draft:

Client/Server environment. No blockchain.

Generation could be done by the servers (which operate as a sort of banks) based on hashing (BTC style) or uptime and effort towards the network.

2 decimals only. 0.01 to be the minimum nothing bellow it.

The currency itself would be then certificates, being the servers able to process payments by revoke those certificates against PK A and passing them to PK B. Each of those certificates would have a specific amount; 0.01, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.50,1,2,5,10,20,50,100

So basically if I'm going to pay you 43, I'll be sending you two 20 certs + 1 2 cert + 1 1 cert. My client announces it to, let's say, 10~100 banks which start to process the payment revoking those 2x20+2+1 certs I have and reissuing it to you. The trust and double spending prevention is then done by multicasting the transference through multiple "banks".

So, then came the FBI and shuts down the servers...
P2P blockchain is the most powerful tool that we have today to play a alternate currency that is impossible to these fuckers (FBI/US Gov/etc) to shutdown it.

Um? What's the point of this? Really?

Either run the old chain and thus everyone keeps their coins or create a new chain and call it whatever you like and say it's a new chain.

So it's either Solidcoin (the pre 2.0 version) or it's some new chain - don't start using excuses to create another based on the old one then hacking it - that's really no different to 2.0 anyway.

Keep it simple and clear.

I like this idea. No ideas come to mind yet
I'll think of somethin....
or ad a couple gigahashes maybe....