[OFFICIAL POLL] QRK LOGO COMPETITION

[Allow]

Please guys...do you REALLY don't see the difference between smaragda logo and this? http://forum.qrk.cc/thread/1704/quark-logo-competition-entry

Wtf...

Repeat: Top designer (maybe 1, 2 or max 3 in this contest) spend many time for a logo design, you have to be granted a fair race, meritocratic.

The winner of a logo contest MUST be chosen by who started contest (or admins of coin).

Clearly if you do it this way will not win any who did the best logo, but only those who can get the most votes.

[Allow]

Please guys...do you REALLY don't see the difference between smaragda logo and this?

ROFLMAO!    

Sorry but if you are a real designer you should understand this (and admit it), if you not understand you are so hypocritical.

Or maybe you have only bad taste. So critical for a designer. rofl...

[Allow]

Ok smaragda if you win compliments, but it's only ANOTHER unfair contest. Who can get more votes win...

PS. I'm not troll you, but i'm a designer and see this logo winner is so disappointing.

[KJO]

Please guys...do you REALLY don't see the difference between smaragda logo and this?

ROFLMAO!   

Keep writing "roflmao" and calling respected quark community members "trolls".

Your acquiescence to our valid concerns speaks volumes. So does the fact that you have to take every available moment to explain your inferior design and we still don't understand it.

What you created is a nice picture that belongs somewhere on a video game or on a spacehip, but it has no practical value whatsoever as a logo. It is confusing, overdone, and says nothing about quark. In fact when I look at it, it makes me confused whether you are trying to market quark or market yourself.

[mymenace]

What is unprofessional is to call other people names or attack their work

Please be respectful of other peoples work

I as a customer would be very hesitant of approaching a designer who behaved in the these ways


constructive criticism is professional behaviour

such as

i do not like that design

I prefer this persons design

Here are some helpful tips (work is too busy looking)

[KJO]

What is unprofessional is to call other people names or attack their work

Please be respectful of other peoples work

I as a customer would be very hesitant of approaching a designer who behaved in the above ways


constructive criticism is professional behaviour

such as

i do not like that design

I prefer this persons design

Here are some helpful tips (work is too busy looking)

Wrong. Those are not professional critiques. A professional designer responds to the artist's program. I see you have never been in a design jury. Well let me educate you then.

A valid critique is "this logo fails to adhere to the program" or "the designer seems more interested in superfluous geometrics than the motif".

Constructive criticism can only take place when the designer accepts said constructive criticism.

What we have now is an amateur who draws nice pictures and has rigged the voting to claim a substantial prize with a logo design that fails its very purpose while calling very concerned quarkers "trolls".

Allow is 100% correct.

[mymenace]

What is unprofessional is to call other people names or attack their work

Please be respectful of other peoples work

I as a customer would be very hesitant of approaching a designer who behaved in the above ways


constructive criticism is professional behaviour

such as

i do not like that design

I prefer this persons design

Here are some helpful tips (work is too busy looking)

Wrong. Those are not professional critiques. A professional designer responds to the artist's program. I see you have never been in a design jury. Well let me educate you then.

A valid critique is "this logo fails to adhere to the program" or "the designer seems more interested in superfluous geometrics than the motif".

Constructive criticism can only take place when the designer accepts said constructive criticism.

What we have now is an amateur who draws nice pictures and has rigged the voting to claim a substantial prize with a logo design that fails its very purpose while calling very concerned quarkers "trolls".

Allow is 100% correct.

agree with your professional critiques

but am I not correct when i say it is unprofessional to call other people names or attack their work

[KJO]

I'm in the top 4  

You are the future winner.

You do more with a simplistic schematic than smaragda does with a billion lines.

Your design is simple, elegant, immediately recognizable, aesthetically pleasing, and utilizes color in a subtle and stunning fashion.

Your "less is more" approach is highly successful because you see fit to serve the spirit of quark unlike smaragda who tries to overpower the logo with scale and an overabundance of geometrics to compensate for a lack of cohesion.

[Boxxl]

Thanks man

I spend a lot of time on my design

I'm in the top 4  

You are the future winner.

You do more with a simplistic schematic than smaragda does with a billion lines.

Your design is simple, elegant, immediately recognizable, aesthetically pleasing, and utilizes color in a subtle and stunning fashion.

Your "less is more" approach is highly successful because you see fit to serve the spirit of quark unlike smaragda who tries to overpower the logo with scale and an overabundance of geometrics to compensate for a lack of cohesion.

Boxxl

[KJO]

...with a logo design that fails its very purpose...

Go tell that to those that have participated in a logo CHANGE contest and have come up with the EXISTING logo as their submission!?!?!    

ROFLMAO!  

Don't worry... I will eventually have to leave my workstation and/or go to sleep... so you won't have to deal with my responses!!!  


Edit:  ...you will just have to read my responses all together later!

There is nothing wrong with the orig logo my friend. It is the textural and color treatment of the orig logo that needs refinement.

You are trying to reinvent the wheel but have blown the tires out in the process.

I have no horses in this game. I am looking for the most marketable logo for quark and yours is not it.

You continued acquiescence to our concerns shows me enough to know you couldnt care less about quark.

[reRaise]

The current Quark logo will stay, even after the voting has been finished.

[DeluxBoy]

Good luck to all - and vote for me: AnnonQ 

http://imgur.com/Ub1kMkn

[duuuuude]

here is mine please vote for  duuuuude








j

[Boxxl]

The current logo of Quark is good. But a good design can have a huge different.
We shall see this year... the marketcap of Quark

[barrysoetoro]

VOTE BARRY!! VOTE BARRY!!!  

   

https://i.imgur.com/hCHuNSC.jpg

Full image:
https://i.imgur.com/78o0gxn.jpg

[Zzzack]

Post your designs in this thread then we'll vote

[FlipPro]

MY VOTE IS FOR:

mjbmonetarymetals

[cryptasm]

MY VOTE IS FOR:
mjbmonetarymetals

+1 dudes put a lot of work in and I like his upgrade of the original logo.

[Zzzack]

I think leigrecc should win. his has always been my favorite



And whats smargdda's design? Is it bad and is he trying to rig?

[Prabhjot Lalli]

I personally voted for mjbmonetarymetals. But I'm loving martijnp design also. Hard decision. But I'm fine as long as smaragda won't win.