utopianfuture (OP)
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 01:12:16 PM Last edit: February 02, 2014, 07:17:36 PM by utopianfuture |
|
This is the third thread on the issue of making decisions regarding NXT common fund following the first poll on the decision to form a funding committee to control the NXT common fund of unclaimed coin here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=418695.0 and the second poll on the basic working principle of the funding committee here https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=423241.0At this point, I think it is time to start the nomination process for the funding committee working on basics of the principle lay out in the second poll. Disclaimer: I have been suggested to be in the committee before but at this point I would respectably decline that honor due to other personal commitment. I suppose that if any nomination have a reason that he/ she can't be involved in the committee would also publicly decline that honor. After all the the nominations are collected, we can move to the next step of the actual voting for members on the committee. This could be discussed in details later but I hope no one objects a simple process of writing down the nominations if you want to be in the funding committee in this thread. Voting later could be for 5-9 committee members and 2-3 alternates. I would start by the nomination process by listing here some of my favorite people and also some people who have been suggested before, not in particular order. All nicks are bitcointalk accounts unless specified otherwise. Let's the thread run for at least a few days. - come_from_beyond : decline - Jean_Luc - Joefox - rickyjames - salsacz- - Nifty (nextcoin forum) - Anon136 - Klee - opticalcarrier - msin - pinarello
|
|
|
|
landomata
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2184
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 01:15:27 PM Last edit: February 03, 2014, 08:35:50 AM by landomata |
|
Pouncer
7-9 people MAX.
FINAL OPEN POLL TO PICK MEMBERS WILL TAKE PLACE ON NEXTCOIN.ORG & NXTCRYPTO.ORG.
YOU CAN SIGNUP ON EITHER NEXTCOIN or NXTCRYPTO before the poll start date BUT ONLY IF YOU HAVE POSTED ON THE NXT :: descendant of Bitcoin - Updated Information THREAD BEFORE FEBRUARY 2nd.2014
And the account name must be the same.....if someone has squatted on your name then pls get in touch with the ADMIN.
THE NAME MUST BE THE EXACT SAME TO QUALIFY.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 01:17:11 PM |
|
Good list.
Should we also vote on the number of people in the committee?
|
|
|
|
utopianfuture (OP)
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 602
Merit: 268
Internet of Value
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 01:18:39 PM |
|
Good list.
Should we also vote on the number of people in the committee?
What do you think 7 or 9 ? we would also need some alternates.
|
|
|
|
Damelon
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1092
Merit: 1010
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 01:28:06 PM |
|
Good list.
Should we also vote on the number of people in the committee?
What do you think 7 or 9 ? we would also need some alternates. I would say seven. That means less talk and more action. All on the list are trusted. As a committee they'd balance each other anyway. If they can't decide thén they go back to the community, but only as a total last resort. I also would prefer if they weren't under a constant need to justify their expenses in the short term. Most of the things they need to do is long term, so let's give them trust and take a longer view than the one, two week one that has sometimes been seen. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif)
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 01:28:27 PM |
|
I thought of 5 people. But we can vote on that ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
abuelau
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 01:50:58 PM |
|
Pouncer
7 people MAX.
I also vote for pouncer
|
|
|
|
abctc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1038
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 02:29:44 PM |
|
|
██████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ██████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ ████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████ | , the Next platform. Magis quam Moneta (More than a Coin) |
|
|
|
gs02xzz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 02:44:33 PM |
|
I thought of 5 people. But we can vote on that ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) +1.
|
|
|
|
EpicKalypze
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 9
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 03:24:06 PM |
|
Finding out the personalities based off Jung's functions would put their pros and cons to balance. I highly recommend the following web links to get a quick understanding: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LdIEDNUOhUY&feature=sharehttp://www.cognitivetype.com/database/It maybe optimal to utilize as many of the 8 functions as possible: Example; NeFi, SeFi, TeSi, FeNi hold all 8 functions to the highest two levels of either Dominant or Subordinate. Even with the other four variations of this pattern they'd still see the world in totally different ways, which allows them to encompass a wide margin of techniques for great results.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 05:44:08 PM |
|
You discouraged a lot of people with your post, I suppose ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) Guys and Gals, just post the people you want to nominate for the committee!
|
|
|
|
salsacz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 05:50:19 PM |
|
Damelon, Allwelder, Uniqueorn, VanBreuk, EvilDave
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 06:07:22 PM |
|
Remove me, plz.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 06:09:46 PM |
|
I thought of 5 people. But we can vote on that ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) 1st let's vote if we will vote on that. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
|
EvilDave
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 07:05:32 PM |
|
Damelon, Allwelder, Uniqueorn, VanBreuk, EvilDave
It's an honour, but I have 2 reasons to (almost) say no: I've got a lot of real life commitments, NXT is eating up a lot of my free(ish) time. I want to get a carbon-offset project set up, this will mean that I will want to have access to/control of quite a lot of NXT, and If i'm on the committee that decides to give me the money for my own pet project....hmmmm. Having said all that, I'll accept a committee place if we really can't find anyone else willing to step up. TL:DR: EvilDave to the very bottom of the list, please.
|
|
|
|
EvilDave
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 07:27:07 PM |
|
buybitcoinscanada
|
|
|
|
brooklynbtc
Sr. Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 336
Merit: 250
AKA jefdiesel
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 07:31:22 PM |
|
I would like to make myself available to help with this project.
jefdiesel
|
|
|
|
VanBreuk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 07:49:04 PM Last edit: February 02, 2014, 08:00:22 PM by VanBreuk |
|
Damelon, Allwelder, Uniqueorn, VanBreuk, EvilDave
I appreciate (and am surprised by) the fact you brought up my name while picking in a pool full of world class talented people. I do have experience in online communities management, some age and a few burns from politics, but I cannot bring technical expertise... I'm no developer, no cryptographer, no economist. Unneeded for Nxt fund management? I'm not so sure. My five picks: rickyjames, Klee, jl777, Anon136, joefox, with Damelon and salsacz in the bench.
|
|
|
|
NxtChg
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 07:54:22 PM |
|
Why nobody mentioned bitcoinpaul?
|
|
|
|
Uniqueorn
Full Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif) ![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
NXT.org
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
February 02, 2014, 07:57:55 PM |
|
Damelon, Allwelder, Uniqueorn, VanBreuk, EvilDave
I appreciate (and am surprised by) the fact you brought up my name while picking in a pool full of world class talented people. I do have experience in online communities management, some age and a few burns from politics, but I cannot bring technical expertise... I'm no developer, no cryptographer, no economist. Unneeded for Nxt fund management? I'm not so sure. My five picks keeping in mind the best interests for the community: rickyjames, Klee, jl777, Anon136, joefox Damelon and salsacz in the bench. This brings up the issue of technical fund vs marketing fund. Clearly we need experts of tech to control the technical fund and those who are good at marketing to manage the marketing funds.
|
|
|
|
|