jamesg (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
|
|
September 18, 2011, 01:59:02 PM |
|
I have a couple of machines running 3 5970s and am getting higher than usual stale rates. The stale rate for these machines seems to stay around .95% while other boxes with 5830s or 6950s are running rates from .2% to .35%. Has anyone else seen this and do you have an explanation for this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: the cutting edge of begging technology." -- Giraffe.BTC
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
coinhammer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 1
|
|
September 18, 2011, 06:26:56 PM |
|
two 3x 5970 rigs, one 2x 5970 rig - last twelve hours .17% - .37% stales - consistent with prior stats. only variance factor noted are the pools, some are better some are worse.
|
|
|
|
jamesg (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
|
|
September 18, 2011, 09:40:45 PM |
|
Before drawing any conclusions, make sure you take your measurements on a long enough time scale/number of shares. IMO, watching things for a couple of hours isn't enough to draw conclusions.
I have tested the machines for multiple days and on different pools. Same results. Could this be something with the aggression setting in phoenix?
|
|
|
|
jamesg (OP)
VIP
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1000
AKA: gigavps
|
|
September 27, 2011, 03:54:17 PM |
|
Well, it looks like I found my answer. Seems that my home internet connection has something to do with it. When I moved the boxes to the DC, the stale rate moved back to where all of the other miners were at. Weird.
|
|
|
|
Mousepotato
|
|
September 27, 2011, 04:28:18 PM |
|
Yeah IIRC, your internet connection has a lot to do with stales. High latency = more stales, but I'm not sure why.
|
Mousepotato
|
|
|
CanaryInTheMine
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1060
between a rock and a block!
|
|
September 27, 2011, 10:38:33 PM |
|
Yeah IIRC, your internet connection has a lot to do with stales. High latency = more stales, but I'm not sure why.
doesn't get there fast enough?
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 28, 2011, 01:26:49 AM |
|
That probably explains my high stale rate... I have 9 rigs on hubs that are on a 200 feet of cat5 from the router
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079
Gerald Davis
|
|
September 29, 2011, 02:51:37 AM |
|
That probably explains my high stale rate... I have 9 rigs on hubs that are on a 200 feet of cat5 from the router
You are kidding right? Good Ethernet cable will transmit at about 70% of speed of light. 200ft of extra cable maybe adds 0.0000001 seconds to transmission time.
|
|
|
|
jjiimm_64
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1876
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 29, 2011, 04:19:56 AM |
|
That probably explains my high stale rate... I have 9 rigs on hubs that are on a 200 feet of cat5 from the router
You are kidding right? Good Ethernet cable will transmit at about 70% of speed of light. 200ft of extra cable maybe adds 0.0000001 seconds to transmission time. When I first set up in the shed, I only had 3 rigs.. stale was at .3% as I added rigs, the stales got higher. could be the old hub im using. not sure I have a target rich environment for improvement and higher hashrates
|
1jimbitm6hAKTjKX4qurCNQubbnk2YsFw
|
|
|
|