Bitcoin Forum
May 25, 2024, 07:19:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: crossfire or not?  (Read 561 times)
ibrahim11 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 777
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 11:30:44 PM
 #1

I have 2 msi 280x twin frozr gaming edition gpu's.  Should I use crossfire? Thanks
kalus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 263

let's make a deal.


View Profile
February 02, 2014, 11:34:15 PM
 #2

no.

DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
Fastpow
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 102



View Profile
February 03, 2014, 12:28:40 AM
 #3

no.

And why not?
JL0z
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 12:34:16 AM
 #4

Cgminer and other miners will utilize all gpu's installed in the system - those that are configured, that is.  There is no need to use crossfire to combine them - actually this might make it hash less.  I did have 3x 7950's on one machine running Linux, all hashing well - until one 7950 decided to have a fan failure, now waiting on a replacement.

If you were gaming under Windows, and wanted more performance, then yes - crossfire them.  You can still use the machine for mining when not gaming.
breakbeater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 444
Merit: 250


Life is a bitch, get used to it...


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 11:20:24 AM
 #5

I have 2 x 280x from MSI in Crossfire and they hash more stable @ 735 kh in CF mode and GPU0 @ 680kh / GPU1 @ 735kh when CF is disabled.
I use cgminer 3.1.1
Kenshin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 280
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 11:25:26 AM
 #6

Cgminer and other miners will utilize all gpu's installed in the system - those that are configured, that is.  There is no need to use crossfire to combine them - actually this might make it hash less.  I did have 3x 7950's on one machine running Linux, all hashing well - until one 7950 decided to have a fan failure, now waiting on a replacement.

If you were gaming under Windows, and wanted more performance, then yes - crossfire them.  You can still use the machine for mining when not gaming.

+1 I have tried mining with Cross FIre, and the hashrate are much slower.
breakbeater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 444
Merit: 250


Life is a bitch, get used to it...


View Profile
February 03, 2014, 11:27:31 AM
 #7

I guess i am the lucky one, mining in CF @ 735kh with default settings.
JL0z
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 12:24:38 AM
 #8

I guess i am the lucky one, mining in CF @ 735kh with default settings.

Definitely!  Even though people use the same configuration, each card actually is different.  For example, when I was running 3x 7950's at default clocks, each 7950 would give me 582Kh individually, but together - only the first gpu gave me 582Kh, the other two only got 530Kh or so - when running at intensity 18.  However, if I bump up the other two cards to intensity 19 each, then all three would give 582Kh.  With overclocking, they can get 630Kh without getting two hot, but here in Australia - it is summer, so I don't like the gpu's getting to 90 degrees, so am keeping them under 85 degrees - once we get to winter, I can run them harder.

[Edit]  Also, the cgminer version does make a difference - the latest is not always the greatest.  I am running 3.7.2 - the last version to support gpu's.  I feel that 3.6.6 was giving me slightly better hashing, but am staying with 3.7.2.
RB25
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 831
Merit: 500


BitSong is a decentralized music streaming platfor


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 12:43:55 AM
 #9

They way it was explained to me was that when you Crossfire or SLI, the cards have to communicate with each other as well as perform the designates task. This causes some card resources to be allocated to communication rather than hashing.

Or did someone tell me wrong?

.BITSONG.
████
████
████
████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████

            ████
            ████
            ████
            ████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████
████    ████
██
██
██
██
██        ██
██  ██  ██  ██
██  ██  ██  ██
██  ██  ██  ██
██  ██  ██  ██
      ██  ██  ██
            ██
.▬▬▬▬TELEGRAM▬▬▬▬.
⇪  CHANNEL   ⇪    GROUP   ⇪
Twitter  Facebook  Medium
JL0z
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 04, 2014, 01:03:08 AM
 #10

They way it was explained to me was that when you Crossfire or SLI, the cards have to communicate with each other as well as perform the designates task. This causes some card resources to be allocated to communication rather than hashing.

Or did someone tell me wrong?

That is correct.  When you see the games performance gain with crossfire or sli, it isn't +100%, but generally +90-95%.  However, each card is different, and it must be possible that in some cases, crossfire actually performs better than individually.  I know that my cards don't do the same as reported by others - I have to set different intensities to get the same hashing rate across the cards, so either something in my configuration is doing this.  By the way, some people say that we must use dummy plugs, and others say it isn't necessary - I only have a monitor connected to the first card, and nothing on the others - maybe I should try the dummy plugs, anyway, just a thought.
kalus
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 420
Merit: 263

let's make a deal.


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 07:00:14 AM
 #11

because mining.

DC2ngEGbd1ZUKyj8aSzrP1W5TXs5WmPuiR wow need noms
FilipZ
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10

IGT-crypto - lifetime income from working exchange


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 08:51:32 AM
 #12

I guess i am the lucky one, mining in CF @ 735kh with default settings.

maybe 735 is less than 735+695
or is it 2x735? so it should be 1470?
how many GPU's are in miner 0,1 or 0?

▬▬▬ ALREADY WORKING EXCHANGE ▻▻▻ IGT - CRYPTO ◁◁◁50% SOFT CAP COMPLETED▬▬▬
▬▬▬ G I V E A W A Y ETH every week LIFETIME PASSIVE INCOME▬▬▬▬     
▻▻▻WHITE PAPERANN THREAD◁◁◁
breakbeater
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 444
Merit: 250


Life is a bitch, get used to it...


View Profile
February 05, 2014, 08:58:55 AM
 #13

In CF i have 2x735kh and with CF disabled GPU0 (680-690kh) + GPU1 (730-735kh)
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!