Ins (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 08:52:27 PM |
|
Why? 0.5BTC investment = 0.525BTC back. 10 transactions it is +0.25BTC profit. It is simple way to decrease queue, increase speed and payouts. Of course if big deposit's made:) If you scared about your queue number There are 60 queued transactions < 0.1 BTC
|
|
|
|
tudorjones
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 08:55:29 PM |
|
Feature: Ability to find your wallet address in queue would be amazing!
It would help stop people from complaining about when they are getting payouts.
|
|
|
|
Ins (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 08:56:12 PM |
|
I will add it soon. I thought abt it.
|
|
|
|
tonino
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:04:27 PM |
|
Why? 0.5BTC investment = 0.525BTC back. 10 transactions it is +0.25BTC profit. It is simple way to decrease queue, increase speed and payouts. Of course if big deposit's made:) If you scared about your queue number There are 60 queued transactions < 0.1 BTC
you really make a very good work here, but the investments will dry out with 5%, imho. but lets see and anyway you can reverse it back.
|
|
|
|
Ins (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:12:45 PM |
|
I have idea how to promote it going to be realized in 1 day
|
|
|
|
wayneyoyo
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:19:17 PM |
|
Change back to 20% when theres traffic
|
|
|
|
tonino
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:22:26 PM |
|
Change back to 20% when theres traffic
5% will not bring traffic imho sorry to repeat myself. just want to be helpful
|
|
|
|
thedude3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:29:46 PM |
|
I have idea how to promote it going to be realized in 1 day Sorry Ins, made an account just to say this but I won't be playing anymore if it is not 120%. The blockchain takes way too long to have my money tied up for 1.05x my investment. The fact that its also a "ponzi" is even more offputting to potential investors just because nobody in their right mind is going to risk something for 1.05x return. I appreciate your work on this and I will continue to use the living shit out of Insdice at 120% but 105% just isn't worth it in my opinion and after this payout will be the last time I send money (so far I've sent 1btc exactly). Idk man I'm sure you have your reasons, but in the words of the great Joe Dirt, it's not what you like, it's the consumer. Thanks
|
|
|
|
zryw
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:31:04 PM |
|
Ponzi.io had no problem because it was first site. My is second one. ponzio.io scammed people, so they are afraid of this sites now.
they don't trust your Ponzi anymore because of the long long last night without the payout. No one knew you were doing it manually. I think you should place somewhere on site all the news you write here and the list of upgrades too. Just to show random visitors the site and dev are well and alive.
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:34:08 PM |
|
So while the deficit between what has been invested and what has been sent (120%) is low, everything runs smoothly...now when that deficit (~20BTC yesterday, probably closer to 30-40BTC now) gets larger and payouts get longer and longer from investments, the investment amount is bumped up 100x! Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm where have we seen this before...
|
|
|
|
tonino
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:36:18 PM |
|
I have idea how to promote it going to be realized in 1 day Sorry Ins, made an account just to say this but I won't be playing anymore if it is not 120%. The blockchain takes way too long to have my money tied up for 1.05x my investment. The fact that its also a "ponzi" is even more offputting to potential investors just because nobody in their right mind is going to risk something for 1.05x return. I appreciate your work on this and I will continue to use the living shit out of Insdice at 120% but 105% just isn't worth it in my opinion and after this payout will be the last time I send money (so far I've sent 1btc exactly). Idk man I'm sure you have your reasons, but in the words of the great Joe Dirt, it's not what you like, it's the consumer. Thanks exactly what I meant when I gave my short comments. 5% is way to risky for big investments in a ponzi and 5% for small investors doesnt make sense at all. ponzi is exisiting and working because of high payouts. thanks to the post(man)
|
|
|
|
Ins (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:38:21 PM |
|
FUR11, that is first reason to set lower percentage to get back smaller deficit. You are greatly right! zryw, I am sorry for that. But ponzi.io doesnt pays everybody. I can do that too, but it is not good way. For example I can process firstly small transactions, so maybe big amounts never processed, but i am using my way - processing step-by-step. tonino, i absolutely understand that all want 20% profit. but when deficit is big - it is going sloooowly. so to get smaller deficit I must set 5% profit for some time.
|
|
|
|
tonino
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:48:02 PM |
|
FUR11, that is first reason to set lower percentage to get back smaller deficit. You are greatly right! zryw, I am sorry for that. But ponzi.io doesnt pays everybody. I can do that too, but it is not good way. For example I can process firstly small transactions, so maybe big amounts never processed, but i am using my way - processing step-by-step. tonino, i absolutely understand that all want 20% profit. but when deficit is big - it is going sloooowly. so to get smaller deficit I must set 5% profit for some time.
Ins I am really with you and hope you are right and it will work out as you wish.
|
|
|
|
FUR11
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 250
FURring bitcoin up since 1762
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:49:49 PM |
|
FUR11, that is first reason to set lower percentage to get back smaller deficit. You are greatly right! zryw, I am sorry for that. But ponzi.io doesnt pays everybody. I can do that too, but it is not good way. For example I can process firstly small transactions, so maybe big amounts never processed, but i am using my way - processing step-by-step. tonino, i absolutely understand that all want 20% profit. but when deficit is big - it is going sloooowly. so to get smaller deficit I must set 5% profit for some time.
Lower % doesn't mean lower deficit. That's not how math works. The deficit will continue to grow, albeit slower. But you can't reduce the deficit if you are still paying out over 100%.
|
|
|
|
thedude3
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:50:00 PM |
|
FUR11, that is first reason to set lower percentage to get back smaller deficit. You are greatly right! zryw, I am sorry for that. But ponzi.io doesnt pays everybody. I can do that too, but it is not good way. For example I can process firstly small transactions, so maybe big amounts never processed, but i am using my way - processing step-by-step. tonino, i absolutely understand that all want 20% profit. but when deficit is big - it is going sloooowly. so to get smaller deficit I must set 5% profit for some time.
If the payouts are taking a long time you need to get back into the code my friend. Ponzi.io had it working perfectly, payouts were fast and people were depositing way larger amounts. If you go to 5% surely you will lose customers, maybe eventually you'll get back to the smaller deficit but I think that problem lies with your code not the payout percentage.
|
|
|
|
zryw
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:53:21 PM |
|
ponzi.io doesnt pays everybody. I can do that too, but it is not good way.
I don't say to scam, but to maintain transparent rules. Yesterday everyone was waiting for the last payout which occurred not after one, two but four hours. This is why many people cashed out on the morning and left. You should've left a message that the payouts would be continued on morning. Transparency is everything here. Anyway, I an see great upgrades since Saturday, you're doing good work here If the payouts are taking a long time you need to get back into the code my friend. Ponzi.io had it working perfectly, payouts were fast and people were depositing way larger amounts. If you go to 5% surely you will lose customers, maybe eventually you'll get back to the smaller deficit but I think that problem lies with your code not the payout percentage.
Ponzi.io was a cheater. I have seen many voices of random no-payouts at all. Here the payouts are slow because the people just ran away scared by no payout time last night.
|
|
|
|
Ins (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:56:05 PM |
|
FUR11, I understand that it will be growing up. Maybe my math is incorrect. My idea is cover up previous 120% deposits because should be bigger amounts invested (1BTC,0.5BTC). When it is covered, we can continue 120%
|
|
|
|
wayneyoyo
|
|
February 10, 2014, 09:58:46 PM |
|
FUR11, I understand that it will be growing up. Maybe my math is incorrect. My idea is cover up previous 120% deposits because should be bigger amounts invested (1BTC,0.5BTC). When it is covered, we can continue 120%
Why not restart the game ? altho i dint win from this one but a new one will sure attract a lot more player since you have the last one sucess . i will be the first one to invest
|
|
|
|
Ins (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 10:00:55 PM |
|
I can of course.
|
|
|
|
blundcoder
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 10:01:04 PM |
|
We just should go back to 120% + get some adds. Restart doenst sounds good cuz nobody gonna trust this ponzi no more. Since u changed to 105% nobody paid. We need 120 back plus adds on google ads or smth.
|
|
|
|
|