I
didn't think BTC ever had much chance of being declared a security, in the US, at least. It doesn't really fit their criteria. ETH was slightly more doubtful because people were trading it before the coin had officially launched, which blurs the lines a bit. ETH fans should probably breathe a sigh of relief.
I'm also hopefully optimistic that, because the article completely neglected to mention Ripple, there's still a chance they might categorise that centralised crapcoin as a security.
Anything launched as an ICO is at high risk of being labelled a security by the regulators.
//EDIT: Plus, ditto to what LeGaulois said just below, heh.
*
Insert post about the SEC being "loudmouth dumbasses" here*
All it would really do is cause a temporary blip to the fiat prices anyway.