Blockchain.com Shared send feature gone?????

[jrretirement]

Anyone know why?

[tacotime]

probably has something to do with this replacing it

https://sharedcoin.com/

[Holliday]

probably has something to do with this replacing it

https://sharedcoin.com/

Wow. That is awesome.

[jrretirement]

I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service?

[Peter R]

I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]

I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.

Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?

[Lauda]

probably has something to do with this replacing it

https://sharedcoin.com/

Thanks for sharing this!

[jrretirement]

I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]

I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.

Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?

Cashing out using multiple family members, trying to avoid the TAX man if they can link it all your going to have to pay tax, not now so much but in the future!

[Peter R]

I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]

I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.

Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?

Cashing out using multiple family members, trying to avoid the TAX man if they can link it all your going to have to pay tax, not now so much but in the future!

A few of my family members have invested in bitcoin.  Nearly all of our address share taint (I've checked!).  I don't see why my sister can't cash out her coins independently of my grandmother.  So what if they share taint?  

[jrretirement]

I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service? [thereby removing all taint]

I certainly believe in our right to privacy, but I don't understand the need to remove 100% of the taint. Using SharedCoin with, say, 4 relays, you've really made a mess of the link between the sending and receiving addresses.

Can someone give me an example when this would not be sufficient?

Cashing out using multiple family members, trying to avoid the TAX man if they can link it all your going to have to pay tax, not now so much but in the future!

A few of my family members have invested in bitcoin.  Nearly all of our address share taint (I've checked!).  I don't see why my sister can't cash out her coins independently of my grandmother.  So what if they share taint?   

I'm not arguing with you I'm just trying to get some extra info!

[Phinnaeus Gage]

probably has something to do with this replacing it

https://sharedcoin.com/

Wow. That is awesome.

Damn straight! If Matthew N. Wright was still around, he would update the following image:



<not a diss toward sharedcoin.com, for I truly like it, but...>

[dserrano5]

I heard the shared coin still leaves a connection to the original coins, where as shared send was a complete tumbling service?

If everyone uses this, eventually all coins end up being "tainted".

[medUSA]

Most people who got there btc from legit transactions wouldn't need any mixing service.
If I really want to "mix" my coins, I will probably just send them to a dice site and withdraw.

[dserrano5]

Most people who got there btc from legit transactions wouldn't need any mixing service.

So you wouldn't mind your landlord upping the rent after learning your monthly income?

[medUSA]

So you wouldn't mind your landlord upping the rent after learning your monthly income?

If my landlord learns how much I make a month, he would lower the rent.

[Aswan]

probably has something to do with this replacing it

https://sharedcoin.com/

Wait what? someone finally created Coinjoin? This is so awesome!

Wait how does it work? I know how Coinjoin works but why does this site require a blockchain.info account? Coinjoin should work without that...

[dserrano5]

Wait what? someone finally created Coinjoin? This is so awesome!

There are a couple of previous attempts, search for andytoshi and coinmux.

[banaltcoin]

Most people who got there btc from legit transactions wouldn't need any mixing service.
If I really want to "mix" my coins, I will probably just send them to a dice site and withdraw.

what if the dice site gives out your received and destination address to the FBI?

[BldSwtTrs]

Sill they have deleted Shared Send which enabled more anonymisation than Shared Coin

[BitCoinDream]

First of all, this is BlockChain.info I guess

[medUSA]

what if the dice site gives out your received and destination address to the FBI?

Why would I mind? I have not done anything illegal.
Besides, FBI probably have all my addresses already.