litecoin123
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:00:55 AM |
|
anybody please... i am getting only 8000kHash I'm running two 280x's no problems, what's your start.bat look like? arOpenCLMAX -o http://ypool.net:8080 -u xxx.xxx -p x -d 0,1 i have got AMD Fusion A6 5400K Black Edition (integrated gpu). i hope that this integrated gpu is not causing problems i would like to mine with 280x not this shitty amd gpu any ideas what is wrong, please Ok, lose the port number - I'm not using one and it's working fine. Secondly, what device number is your Sapphire? Set your .bat to start only the Sapphire by device number. Edit: Your .bat is asking for D1 and D0 to start, you should perhaps only have one device to start? i have removed port number. How can i set .bat to start only the sapphire by device number? is this correct ? but the hash rate is still around 7000/7500khash and it is still hashing only with cpu Initializing Device: Tahiti Platform 00: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing Device 00: Tahiti Device 01: AMD A6-6400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics xptClient_addDeveloperFeeEntry(): Invalid checksum Connected to server using x.pushthrough(xpt) protocol xpt: Logged in with xxx.xxx New block data - height: 3470 tx count: 0 [00:00:00] Start mining New block data - height: 3471 tx count: 0 [00:00:08] kHash/s: 7733.25 Shares total: 0 / 0
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:01:00 AM |
|
So this is interesting and it's hard to tell whether I'm benefiting from it or not. I have a R9 270 and an R9 270x in my machine, and have three instances of the miner running for each (all on seperate workers at ypool). The hash rate has had an insignificant drop after starting the new instances after the first. What are your worker rates in ypool? I am doing similar. I have two workers running the same 2x280x each, seems to have doubled my hashrate and ypool seems to agree. "Share value/h" you mean? worker1: 22.1614 worker11: 19.9653 worker111: 24.4898 worker2: 26.7083 worker22: 29.6703 worker222: 32.2251 Wonder if I should give two more instances a shot? I wish yPool had an "estimated MAX/day" algo like the stratum pools do so I can easily decipher. I don't know what a 270x should give you, but I'm getting 300+ per instance. Maybe you should just double up instances on each card?
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:01:51 AM |
|
Is anyone getting coins out of ypool?
My auto threshold is 5, but confirmed is at 14 at the moment with no sign of a transfer.
Yeah, I sent them a PM and about 20 minutes later I received about 73 MAX. There auto payout is not working if you ask me.
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:02:53 AM |
|
anybody please... i am getting only 8000kHash I'm running two 280x's no problems, what's your start.bat look like? arOpenCLMAX -o http://ypool.net:8080 -u xxx.xxx -p x -d 0,1 i have got AMD Fusion A6 5400K Black Edition (integrated gpu). i hope that this integrated gpu is not causing problems i would like to mine with 280x not this shitty amd gpu any ideas what is wrong, please Ok, lose the port number - I'm not using one and it's working fine. Secondly, what device number is your Sapphire? Set your .bat to start only the Sapphire by device number. Edit: Your .bat is asking for D1 and D0 to start, you should perhaps only have one device to start? i have removed port number. How can i set .bat to start only the sapphire by device number? is this correct ? but the hash rate is still around 7000/7500khash Then try -d 1 I would guess that the onboard graphics would get the first device number, ie: d0
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:03:56 AM |
|
Is anyone getting coins out of ypool?
My auto threshold is 5, but confirmed is at 14 at the moment with no sign of a transfer.
Yeah, I sent them a PM and about 20 minutes later I received about 73 MAX. There auto payout is not working if you ask me. Thanks, looks like they gonna get a pm from me.
|
|
|
|
Dukester797
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:04:13 AM |
|
Doubling the instances is just cutting my hash/s in half in each instance.
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:05:01 AM |
|
Not sure what is going on here... I think it looks like the SDK is giving you grief, which version are you using?
|
|
|
|
litecoin123
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:05:59 AM |
|
anybody please... i am getting only 8000kHash I'm running two 280x's no problems, what's your start.bat look like? arOpenCLMAX -o http://ypool.net:8080 -u xxx.xxx -p x -d 0,1 i have got AMD Fusion A6 5400K Black Edition (integrated gpu). i hope that this integrated gpu is not causing problems i would like to mine with 280x not this shitty amd gpu any ideas what is wrong, please Ok, lose the port number - I'm not using one and it's working fine. Secondly, what device number is your Sapphire? Set your .bat to start only the Sapphire by device number. Edit: Your .bat is asking for D1 and D0 to start, you should perhaps only have one device to start? i have removed port number. How can i set .bat to start only the sapphire by device number? is this correct ? but the hash rate is still around 7000/7500khash Then try -d 1 I would guess that the onboard graphics would get the first device number, ie: d0 now i only get 50 khash Initializing GPU 1 Initializing Device: AMD A6-6400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics Platform 00: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing Device 00: Tahiti Device 01: AMD A6-6400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics xptClient_addDeveloperFeeEntry(): Invalid checksum Connected to server using x.pushthrough(xpt) protocol xpt: Logged in with xxx.xxx New block data - height: 3487 tx count: 0 [00:00:00] Start mining [00:00:08] kHash/s: 0.00 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:16] kHash/s: 32.77 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:24] kHash/s: 43.69 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:32] kHash/s: 49.15 Shares total: 0 / 0
|
|
|
|
Cyrax89721
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:06:24 AM |
|
So this is interesting and it's hard to tell whether I'm benefiting from it or not. I have a R9 270 and an R9 270x in my machine, and have three instances of the miner running for each (all on seperate workers at ypool). The hash rate has had an insignificant drop after starting the new instances after the first. What are your worker rates in ypool? I am doing similar. I have two workers running the same 2x280x each, seems to have doubled my hashrate and ypool seems to agree. "Share value/h" you mean? worker1: 22.1614 worker11: 19.9653 worker111: 24.4898 worker2: 26.7083 worker22: 29.6703 worker222: 32.2251 Wonder if I should give two more instances a shot? I wish yPool had an "estimated MAX/day" algo like the stratum pools do so I can easily decipher. I don't know what a 270x should give you, but I'm getting 300+ per instance. Maybe you should just double up instances on each card? Yeah I thought I'd be getting a MUCH higher hash rate. What's your batch file look like?
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:10:19 AM |
|
anybody please... i am getting only 8000kHash I'm running two 280x's no problems, what's your start.bat look like? arOpenCLMAX -o http://ypool.net:8080 -u xxx.xxx -p x -d 0,1 i have got AMD Fusion A6 5400K Black Edition (integrated gpu). i hope that this integrated gpu is not causing problems i would like to mine with 280x not this shitty amd gpu any ideas what is wrong, please Ok, lose the port number - I'm not using one and it's working fine. Secondly, what device number is your Sapphire? Set your .bat to start only the Sapphire by device number. Edit: Your .bat is asking for D1 and D0 to start, you should perhaps only have one device to start? i have removed port number. How can i set .bat to start only the sapphire by device number? is this correct ? but the hash rate is still around 7000/7500khash Then try -d 1 I would guess that the onboard graphics would get the first device number, ie: d0 now i only get 50 khash Initializing GPU 1 Initializing Device: AMD A6-6400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics Platform 00: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing Device 00: Tahiti Device 01: AMD A6-6400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics xptClient_addDeveloperFeeEntry(): Invalid checksum Connected to server using x.pushthrough(xpt) protocol xpt: Logged in with xxx.xxx New block data - height: 3487 tx count: 0 [00:00:00] Start mining [00:00:08] kHash/s: 0.00 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:16] kHash/s: 32.77 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:24] kHash/s: 43.69 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:32] kHash/s: 49.15 Shares total: 0 / 0 Right, this is what I would do, but no guarantees are offered....... this is at your own risk. I would uninstall drivers and SDK and use the ATI clean-up utility Reboot. Re-install drivers. Reboot. Re-install SDK. Reboot. Go to Device manager and disable the APU. Reboot. Try to mine again without specifying any device, hopefully the APU will be disabled and only your sapphire card will be seen. I would imagine that there is some kind of conflict going on between the two graphics adapters. If that doesn't work, well.......
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:14:17 AM |
|
So this is interesting and it's hard to tell whether I'm benefiting from it or not. I have a R9 270 and an R9 270x in my machine, and have three instances of the miner running for each (all on seperate workers at ypool). The hash rate has had an insignificant drop after starting the new instances after the first. What are your worker rates in ypool? I am doing similar. I have two workers running the same 2x280x each, seems to have doubled my hashrate and ypool seems to agree. "Share value/h" you mean? worker1: 22.1614 worker11: 19.9653 worker111: 24.4898 worker2: 26.7083 worker22: 29.6703 worker222: 32.2251 Wonder if I should give two more instances a shot? I wish yPool had an "estimated MAX/day" algo like the stratum pools do so I can easily decipher. I don't know what a 270x should give you, but I'm getting 300+ per instance. Maybe you should just double up instances on each card? Yeah I thought I'd be getting a MUCH higher hash rate. What's your batch file look like? C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q001/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.1 -p x -d 0,1and C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q002/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.2 -p x -d 0,1I've also tweaked settings a little in Trixx, but only to control heat really, no significant o/c'ing.
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:15:50 AM |
|
Not sure what is going on here... I think it looks like the SDK is giving you grief, which version are you using? 13.9 for cat and 2.7 SDK I'm using SDK 2.9, that could be it.
|
|
|
|
blade87
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:16:13 AM |
|
I've found that overclocking doesn't seem to have any affect on my GPU hash rates.
|
|
|
|
Cyrax89721
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:18:42 AM |
|
So this is interesting and it's hard to tell whether I'm benefiting from it or not. I have a R9 270 and an R9 270x in my machine, and have three instances of the miner running for each (all on seperate workers at ypool). The hash rate has had an insignificant drop after starting the new instances after the first. What are your worker rates in ypool? I am doing similar. I have two workers running the same 2x280x each, seems to have doubled my hashrate and ypool seems to agree. "Share value/h" you mean? worker1: 22.1614 worker11: 19.9653 worker111: 24.4898 worker2: 26.7083 worker22: 29.6703 worker222: 32.2251 Wonder if I should give two more instances a shot? I wish yPool had an "estimated MAX/day" algo like the stratum pools do so I can easily decipher. I don't know what a 270x should give you, but I'm getting 300+ per instance. Maybe you should just double up instances on each card? Yeah I thought I'd be getting a MUCH higher hash rate. What's your batch file look like? C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q001/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.1 -p x -d 0,1and C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q002/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.2 -p x -d 0,1I've also tweaked settings a little in Trixx, but only to control heat really, no significant o/c'ing. Just looked at my Maxcoin client and didn't realize that after a computer restart it decided to revert the "setgenerate" back to true, so it was trying to solomine. Turned that off now. Derp. I actually just noticed that 1GH released their CGMiner, so I headed back over to them now and am getting a steady ~400Mh/sec between both cards. Much better.
|
|
|
|
sussex
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:20:58 AM |
|
For those having problems, here's my software set up:
SDK 2.9
No catalyst, only graphic drivers, version: 13.251.0.0
Running 2 280x's flawlessly.
|
|
|
|
litecoin123
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:25:59 AM |
|
anybody please... i am getting only 8000kHash I'm running two 280x's no problems, what's your start.bat look like? arOpenCLMAX -o http://ypool.net:8080 -u xxx.xxx -p x -d 0,1 i have got AMD Fusion A6 5400K Black Edition (integrated gpu). i hope that this integrated gpu is not causing problems i would like to mine with 280x not this shitty amd gpu any ideas what is wrong, please Ok, lose the port number - I'm not using one and it's working fine. Secondly, what device number is your Sapphire? Set your .bat to start only the Sapphire by device number. Edit: Your .bat is asking for D1 and D0 to start, you should perhaps only have one device to start? i have removed port number. How can i set .bat to start only the sapphire by device number? is this correct ? but the hash rate is still around 7000/7500khash Then try -d 1 I would guess that the onboard graphics would get the first device number, ie: d0 now i only get 50 khash Initializing GPU 1 Initializing Device: AMD A6-6400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics Platform 00: AMD Accelerated Parallel Processing Device 00: Tahiti Device 01: AMD A6-6400K APU with Radeon(tm) HD Graphics xptClient_addDeveloperFeeEntry(): Invalid checksum Connected to server using x.pushthrough(xpt) protocol xpt: Logged in with xxx.xxx New block data - height: 3487 tx count: 0 [00:00:00] Start mining [00:00:08] kHash/s: 0.00 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:16] kHash/s: 32.77 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:24] kHash/s: 43.69 Shares total: 0 / 0 [00:00:32] kHash/s: 49.15 Shares total: 0 / 0 Right, this is what I would do, but no guarantees are offered....... this is at your own risk. I would uninstall drivers and SDK and use the ATI clean-up utility Reboot. Re-install drivers. Reboot. Re-install SDK. Reboot. Go to Device manager and disable the APU. Reboot. Try to mine again without specifying any device, hopefully the APU will be disabled and only your sapphire card will be seen. I would imagine that there is some kind of conflict going on between the two graphics adapters. If that doesn't work, well....... thank you for your advice but unfortunately i cannot disable apu any other suggestions ? replacing cpu ?
|
|
|
|
CrystalCoin
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:34:33 AM |
|
So this is interesting and it's hard to tell whether I'm benefiting from it or not. I have a R9 270 and an R9 270x in my machine, and have three instances of the miner running for each (all on seperate workers at ypool). The hash rate has had an insignificant drop after starting the new instances after the first. What are your worker rates in ypool? I am doing similar. I have two workers running the same 2x280x each, seems to have doubled my hashrate and ypool seems to agree. "Share value/h" you mean? worker1: 22.1614 worker11: 19.9653 worker111: 24.4898 worker2: 26.7083 worker22: 29.6703 worker222: 32.2251 Wonder if I should give two more instances a shot? I wish yPool had an "estimated MAX/day" algo like the stratum pools do so I can easily decipher. I don't know what a 270x should give you, but I'm getting 300+ per instance. Maybe you should just double up instances on each card? Yeah I thought I'd be getting a MUCH higher hash rate. What's your batch file look like? C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q001/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.1 -p x -d 0,1and C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q002/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.2 -p x -d 0,1I've also tweaked settings a little in Trixx, but only to control heat really, no significant o/c'ing. Just looked at my Maxcoin client and didn't realize that after a computer restart it decided to revert the "setgenerate" back to true, so it was trying to solomine. Turned that off now. Derp. I actually just noticed that 1GH released their CGMiner, so I headed back over to them now and am getting a steady ~400Mh/sec between both cards. Much better. How'd you get the cgminer to work? mine doesnt load.
|
|
|
|
Cyrax89721
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:42:12 AM |
|
So this is interesting and it's hard to tell whether I'm benefiting from it or not. I have a R9 270 and an R9 270x in my machine, and have three instances of the miner running for each (all on seperate workers at ypool). The hash rate has had an insignificant drop after starting the new instances after the first. What are your worker rates in ypool? I am doing similar. I have two workers running the same 2x280x each, seems to have doubled my hashrate and ypool seems to agree. "Share value/h" you mean? worker1: 22.1614 worker11: 19.9653 worker111: 24.4898 worker2: 26.7083 worker22: 29.6703 worker222: 32.2251 Wonder if I should give two more instances a shot? I wish yPool had an "estimated MAX/day" algo like the stratum pools do so I can easily decipher. I don't know what a 270x should give you, but I'm getting 300+ per instance. Maybe you should just double up instances on each card? Yeah I thought I'd be getting a MUCH higher hash rate. What's your batch file look like? C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q001/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.1 -p x -d 0,1and C:/Users/xxxxxx/desktop/q002/arOpenCLMAX -o ypool.net -u xxxxxx.2 -p x -d 0,1I've also tweaked settings a little in Trixx, but only to control heat really, no significant o/c'ing. Just looked at my Maxcoin client and didn't realize that after a computer restart it decided to revert the "setgenerate" back to true, so it was trying to solomine. Turned that off now. Derp. I actually just noticed that 1GH released their CGMiner, so I headed back over to them now and am getting a steady ~400Mh/sec between both cards. Much better. How'd you get the cgminer to work? mine doesnt load. Did you download the cgminer from 1GH? I'd link it right now but the site is down at this second.
|
|
|
|
JuanHungLo
|
|
February 08, 2014, 12:43:38 AM |
|
Guys, I just saw that http://max.1gh.com/ now has a cgminer for mining there. However, things are pretty good at ypool right now. If anyone ventures over there and tries it out please let us know how it compares. thanks
|
Bull markets are born on pessimism, grow on skepticism, mature on optimism, and die on euphoria. - John Templeton
|
|
|
|
|