archit (OP)
|
|
February 14, 2014, 09:44:21 AM |
|
Take your time...that Nan guy's miner is pretty darn good for AMD it seems, but I wouldn't be surprised if his 'cpm' are not realistic. 280X cards are pulling 3375 with two instances per card and a slight oc. That's better than an r9 290 or a GTX Titan.
It's in my to-do list. Currently stratum is giving me lots of head aches because of being so poorly documented and cgminer's source code is so ugly that I can't read it
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
February 14, 2014, 09:54:01 AM |
|
Take your time...that Nan guy's miner is pretty darn good for AMD it seems, but I wouldn't be surprised if his 'cpm' are not realistic. 280X cards are pulling 3375 with two instances per card and a slight oc. That's better than an r9 290 or a GTX Titan.
It's in my to-do list. Currently stratum is giving me lots of head aches because of being so poorly documented and cgminer's source code is so ugly that I can't read it lol, I hear ya...yet that kolivas dude raked millions in BTC donations, meh
|
|
|
|
archit (OP)
|
|
February 15, 2014, 05:27:20 AM |
|
Take your time...that Nan guy's miner is pretty darn good for AMD it seems, but I wouldn't be surprised if his 'cpm' are not realistic. 280X cards are pulling 3375 with two instances per card and a slight oc. That's better than an r9 290 or a GTX Titan.
It's in my to-do list. Currently stratum is giving me lots of head aches because of being so poorly documented and cgminer's source code is so ugly that I can't read it lol, I hear ya...yet that kolivas dude raked millions in BTC donations, meh I'll release my stratum implementation too. Everything works except target derivation
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
February 15, 2014, 06:17:57 PM |
|
Take your time...that Nan guy's miner is pretty darn good for AMD it seems, but I wouldn't be surprised if his 'cpm' are not realistic. 280X cards are pulling 3375 with two instances per card and a slight oc. That's better than an r9 290 or a GTX Titan.
It's in my to-do list. Currently stratum is giving me lots of head aches because of being so poorly documented and cgminer's source code is so ugly that I can't read it lol, I hear ya...yet that kolivas dude raked millions in BTC donations, meh I'll release my stratum implementation too. Everything works except target derivation Great, keep up the good work. Looking forward to trying your program.
|
|
|
|
chilin_dude
Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
|
|
February 16, 2014, 07:22:33 PM |
|
Refreshing this thread like a mad man over the past week, look forward to release!
|
|
|
|
archit (OP)
|
|
February 18, 2014, 10:22:23 AM |
|
Refreshing this thread like a mad man over the past week, look forward to release!
stratum is killing me :/
|
|
|
|
gnomegawd
|
|
February 19, 2014, 02:44:59 PM |
|
no reason you can't ask for help arc I am sure there would be a few ppl who could help.
|
|
|
|
khalbrae
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 19, 2014, 07:16:34 PM |
|
Refreshing this thread like a mad man over the past week, look forward to release!
stratum is killing me :/ Just keep up the good work. This program seemed to actually work with older ATI cards a bit too. I ran on a Radeon 4570 and it actually seemed to hash (with errors, but it showed that it was somewhat working). Raw openCL has possibilities
|
|
|
|
archit (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2014, 01:37:16 AM |
|
Refreshing this thread like a mad man over the past week, look forward to release!
stratum is killing me :/ Just keep up the good work. This program seemed to actually work with older ATI cards a bit too. I ran on a Radeon 4570 and it actually seemed to hash (with errors, but it showed that it was somewhat working). Raw openCL has possibilities It sure does, I have some more optimizations in a new kernel I wrote. Anyone who would be able to help me out with stratum? Got most of it working
|
|
|
|
Sunny94
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 32
Merit: 0
|
|
February 22, 2014, 01:47:11 PM |
|
I'm also checking that thread often, maybe the best news would be to find another pool without stratum?
|
|
|
|
archit (OP)
|
|
February 22, 2014, 03:05:27 PM |
|
I'm also checking that thread often, maybe the best news would be to find another pool without stratum?
ypool is coming back up soon
|
|
|
|
ivanlabrie
|
|
February 22, 2014, 06:42:21 PM |
|
I'm also checking that thread often, maybe the best news would be to find another pool without stratum?
ypool is coming back up soon Hope it does...max seems to do ok, pts or utc are no longer as profitable as they were during this week.
|
|
|
|
chilin_dude
Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
|
|
February 24, 2014, 06:22:08 PM |
|
Any eta on when this will be updated to support Startum? Or when Ypool will be back up?
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
February 25, 2014, 11:32:48 PM |
|
We (1gh) are planning to add XPT support soon, most probably tomorrow.
@archit Do you use the protocol profitshare feature for dev fee? If yes, do you see it feasible to reimplement the 'mining for developer' with reconnecting to a pool with your credentials for set amount of time/rounds like yam miner does?
|
|
|
|
khalbrae
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
|
|
February 27, 2014, 12:01:06 AM |
|
I would love to use this program on 1GH =D
I have some older Radeon cards I'd love to test hashing on.
|
|
|
|
archit (OP)
|
|
February 27, 2014, 05:56:30 AM |
|
We (1gh) are planning to add XPT support soon, most probably tomorrow.
@archit Do you use the protocol profitshare feature for dev fee? If yes, do you see it feasible to reimplement the 'mining for developer' with reconnecting to a pool with your credentials for set amount of time/rounds like yam miner does?
I use the protocol feature for developer fees and my client is based on XPTv6 but I can down grade it v5 and get fees the other way around.I'm really busy these days because of exams and unable to focus on the miner so it's going to take a few more days
|
|
|
|
chilin_dude
Member
Offline
Activity: 78
Merit: 10
|
|
February 27, 2014, 11:35:22 AM |
|
We (1gh) are planning to add XPT support soon, most probably tomorrow.
@archit Do you use the protocol profitshare feature for dev fee? If yes, do you see it feasible to reimplement the 'mining for developer' with reconnecting to a pool with your credentials for set amount of time/rounds like yam miner does?
Does this mean it will work with the current released version of OpenCLMax (that worked with ypool?) Thanks!
|
|
|
|
archit (OP)
|
|
February 28, 2014, 07:24:04 AM |
|
We (1gh) are planning to add XPT support soon, most probably tomorrow.
@archit Do you use the protocol profitshare feature for dev fee? If yes, do you see it feasible to reimplement the 'mining for developer' with reconnecting to a pool with your credentials for set amount of time/rounds like yam miner does?
Does this mean it will work with the current released version of OpenCLMax (that worked with ypool?) Thanks! That's precisely what it means.
|
|
|
|
reorder
|
|
February 28, 2014, 01:31:37 PM |
|
XPT for maxcoin runs now on maxpool.1gh.com:17777, maxpool2.1gh.com:17777 . It is at the testing stage now, please PM me if you experince any problems with it. Just a note, frequent 'New block' messages are normal, our pool tries to pick up transactions to include into blocks ASAP, so it has to update miners jobs frequently.
@archit It is not necessary to downgrade to XPT v5, in fact, only v6 has been tested with the pool (current xptMiner). The 'developer fee' field is accepted as usual, but ignored.
|
|
|
|
onliner
|
|
February 28, 2014, 02:27:06 PM |
|
XPT for maxcoin runs now on maxpool.1gh.com:17777, maxpool2.1gh.com:17777 . It is at the testing stage now, please PM me if you experince any problems with it. Just a note, frequent 'New block' messages are normal, our pool tries to pick up transactions to include into blocks ASAP, so it has to update miners jobs frequently.
@archit It is not necessary to downgrade to XPT v5, in fact, only v6 has been tested with the pool (current xptMiner). The 'developer fee' field is accepted as usual, but ignored.
where can i download arOpenCLMAX miner with 1gh *.bat start kit?https://www.dropbox.com/s/ymxe2pturst79t5/arOpenCLMAX0.1b.rar Error (509) This account's public links are generating too much traffic and have been temporarily disabled! !!
|
|
|
|
|