Lamborghini Member hilariousandco has lost his FUCKIN mind !!!

[suchmoon]

It has neutralised Gage's and has dampened the one on Glebs from my point of view, though suchmoon did say he would remove the feedback once I edited mine (which I haven't done yet).

I don't know why you keep twisting this but you need to stop. I have never put any ratings on the Gleb Gamow account. I also said I would remove the counters if your ratings are not based on the loan that doesn't exist anymore and has been resolved to everyone's satisfaction (except yours and digaran's apparently) so I find this statement and your new ratings quite disingenuous.

Having said that, I'm exiting this pissing match of ratings and counters because this can only go downhill from here.

If you want to revise that and state the actual reason why you don't trust him (not the loan that no longer exists) then I'll have no choice but to remove my counter.

[1715017889]

1715017889

[1715017889]

1715017889

[1715017889]

1715017889

[1715017889]

1715017889

[1715017889]

1715017889

[Flying Hellfish]

Actually you don't get to invest in anything with your staff account, why don't you use an alt account and invest your whole life and see if I give a fuck.

ACTUALLY I do get to invest in anything I want as I already have invested in it so it seems reality and you are at odds with each other as usual.

Now that being said I will continue to post and interact as I want to.  When theymos decides I am acting inappropriately I assume he will remove me as P&S mod or talk to me about it.  When DT members have a problem with what I am doing I assume they will tag me as they see fit.

If someone is stupid enough to not do any research about the person offering the investment and the person talking about their investment and invests solely on the basis of seeing 5 letters under my user profile than that person is retarded and I am certainly not responsible for what ANYONE does with their own money just like no one is responsible for what I do with MY money.

Frankly speaking anyone reading my posts would know

1)  I have enjoyed a lot of Bruno's posts over the years
2)  I invested an irrelevant amount of money (although not actually any of your business)
3)  I have publicly called my "investment" a gamble
4)  I though Bruno had a novel idea but questioned if he was the right guy to make it work
5)  I have absolutely not personally endorsed any investment, ever period
6)  I don't speak for the forum and have never claimed too
7)  I'm an atheist preferring logical thought to hardcore dogmatic religious indoctrination (and that
     drives you batshit crazy LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL)

[Quickseller]

I also don't think that a staff should get involved in questionable, ICO activities, refer to FHF the newest moderator who has been in a warm bed with Bruno and his ICO. theymos really should take care of that because we don't want to tie this forum to some very shady ICOs especially when the *dev is a known lair and account seller plus he is in cahoots with DT2 members who'd blatantly counter legit negative feedbacks.

I don't think you have any fucking right whatsoever to tell me where to invest my motherfucking money. 

If it turns out Bruno scammed me (I have already OPENLY admitted this is a possibility) you can rest safely knowing I can afford it (since you seem preoccupied with other people's money).  I have not told ANYONE to invest in ANYFUCKINGTHING on this forum EVER.  I have not asked for nor argued for any trust to be added or removed.

Just because you're to stupid to understand the difference between "investing" in something and "endorsing" something doesn't change reality.

If Bruno’s ICO turns out to be a scam or otherwise unsuccessful then you will lose your money. If it turns out to be a successful enterprise then you may turn a profit. The overwhelming majority of small businesses including those that have an ICO will fail, while those that ultimately succeed generally have great returns.

I don’t think it is outside of the norm for a mod to invest in an ICO. Many mods prefer to keep their money in bitcoin and don’t want to invest in altcoins or ICOs but I don’t see any reason disallow this.

I would say as long as there is no hidden arrangement such as a mod receiving an undisclosed payment to promote an ICO or a payment to say they have invested when they have not or otherwise be deceitful there is no issue here. I am not aware of any of the above being the case in this situation, nor any allegations this is true, unfounded or otherwise.

[Anduck]

If you want to revise that and state the actual reason why you don't trust him (not the loan that no longer exists) then I'll have no choice but to remove my counter.

You seem to be two-faced about these things. When Vod rated me red after blackmailing me (he threatened to red-rate me unless I changed my rating of him), you sided with Vod. Looks like you're completely fine with Vod leaving provably dishonest ratings. Here is more about that case. Of course I understand that you want to protect that positive trust Vod has left you, so you don't want to piss off Vod which would make you lose it. Look what happened to me, when I told Vod I don't particularly trust him --even when it was in private!

All in all, I don't see why people should give much value to your thoughts about trust ratings or trust system, because you are inconsistent. This post is just a FYI to people.

Also remember that suchmoon held that Gleb account (or still holds / has access?) a few days ago, so it's likely that suchmoon has some extra, private, interest in Gleb's ratings.

Your beliefs do not make it scamming, dishonest or untrustworthy behavior. You've proven none of your claims about me calling you a scammer, me scamming, me lying, me admitting lying and so on. You, on the other hand, have done several dishonest and untrustworthy things.

Vod's belief is enough to post a negative feedback for you. Your belief is enough to post a negative feedback for Vod, which you have done. This is not a court of law, it's a community-driven/crowd-sourced/whatchamacallit trust system and Vod clearly does not trust you for a reason. I for one appreciate Vod's feedback as it tells me what kind of auction one can expect from you.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Luckily for me - unluckily for you - I've received PMs from users who are able, willing and ready to pounce on your once positive cred further.

You wanted to play so let's play and see who wins.

Quoting and posting for more visibility. note that I think that certain somebody Bruno is referring here is actually suchmoon. what exactly happened after this post?

There probably was either A) No messages and gleb was just trying to spook me into just removing the feedback and blow smoke up my ass as part of his smear/harassment campaign and hope he actually found something at some point (and so far that's limited to some insane ramblings about Stake and Micro) or B) Some chancer PMd him offering (non-existent) info likely in exchange for money and Bruno got a hard-on instantly, but I'd put my money on the former.

You're in luck. The pharmacy's open 24 hours, thus allowing you to fill your prescription ASAP.

Do you say these things without any degree of irony? If anyone needs meds or is off his meds it's you.

This fucker has totally and literally lost his fuckin mind.

I think a more pertinent question would be when did you lose yours?

The point is that here you're claiming that suchmoon is providing:

a legitimate cover for untrustworthy individuals in order to deceive the public

and

she has also countered other feedbacks to clear the way for suspected extortionists before

when in actual fact, suchmoon's positive trust rating will do nothing to alter the trust rating that the vast majority of folks on this forum will see. There is no "cover"... And as you already pointed out, anyone who digs into the trust, will see ALL the trust, both good and bad and can make up their own minds or investigate further.

It has neutralised Gage's and has dampened the one on Glebs from my point of view, though suchmoon did say he would remove the feedback once I edited mine (which I haven't done yet).

Boy did I nail the title of this thread correctly. H & Co. sends me a PM which I publicly echoed his sentiment. Then he proceeds to stick it up my ass after I caved and cooled. Now he continues to stick it up my ass. This fucker needs to exit the gene pool.

I'm honestly believe that hilariousandco is involved in some scam projects, hence having the OBVIOUS red-ass toward me. He's well-versed in my scam busting prowess (admitted), and perhaps I've indirectly stepped on his toes or that of an entity he's very closely associated with. How close am I?

[Anduck]

I'm honestly believe that hilariousandco is involved in some scam projects, hence having the OBVIOUS red-ass toward me. He's well-versed in my scam busting prowess (admitted), and perhaps I've indirectly stepped on his toes or that of an entity he's very closely associated with. How close am I?

Your ICO (or the ICO you're advertising) has so many red flags and looks like a bruno-get-rich scam to me. People just don't want to publicly acknowledge these things even when they feel the same way. If your ICO is not a scam, you've done good job at making it look like one on so many levels.

[YuTü.Co.in]

I'm honestly believe that hilariousandco is involved in some scam projects, hence having the OBVIOUS red-ass toward me. He's well-versed in my scam busting prowess (admitted), and perhaps I've indirectly stepped on his toes or that of an entity he's very closely associated with. How close am I?

Your ICO (or the ICO you're advertising) has so many red flags and looks like a bruno-get-rich scam to me. People just don't want to publicly acknowledge these things even when they feel the same way. If your ICO is not a scam, you've done good job at making it look like one on so many levels.

Thank you, bud. You're the bestest.

[hilariousetc]

Boy did I nail the title of this thread correctly. H & Co. sends me a PM which I publicly echoed his sentiment. Then he proceeds to stick it up my ass after I caved and cooled. Now he continues to stick it up my ass. This fucker needs to exit the gene pool.

I'm honestly believe that hilariousandco is involved in some scam projects, hence having the OBVIOUS red-ass toward me. He's well-versed in my scam busting prowess (admitted), and perhaps I've indirectly stepped on his toes or that of an entity he's very closely associated with. How close am I?

Of course. That's the only possible explanation here. You only believe what you want to believe and the conspiracy based on nothing is much more sexy than the truth. The only facts here are that you tried to sell your account, which is a total scumbag move and which could have had disastrous consequences, and that's why the feedback was left. If you cared about the community or people here then you wouldn't have done this. You're now trying to run some half-baked ico asking for others money, which like most others will either fail or come to nothing, so if there's any scam going on here it's conducted by you.

If you're so good at busting scams then go find these fantasy ones I'm involved with. I think there's more chance of the people who haven't left you feedback being involved with something because they're worried about some dirt you may or may not uncover. I'm not. Rather than owning up to your own mistakes and apologising for them you'd rather deflect from the issue at hand here with childish insults and pure fantasy, but feel free to go on wild goose chases instead. 

Also remember that suchmoon held that Gleb account (or still holds / has access?) a few days ago, so it's likely that suchmoon has some extra, private, interest in Gleb's ratings.

Suchmoon said he gave the account back to op, but who knows who has access to that. I don't believe he got a signed message from him. I think suchmoon was just trying to do the right thing here and get the account back to the original owner but paying the debt doesn't absolve him of the fact that he readily will give away access to his accounts and that is the whole issue here in the first place. Suchmoon is convinced Gleb is who he says he is, but I'm not so sure there isn't also a third party involved here. A lot of things still just don't add up to me and that's why I think the negative feedback is important here. Believe me, I hope gleb just fucked up by trying to sell the account in a moment of madness and the ICO is a success and everyone makes money, but that's not how they usually go. Gleb could be pretty desperate for money especially if he will sell/loan his accounts out but desperate men can do desperate things, even if they were once good or a respected member of a community.

[suchmoon]

If you want to revise that and state the actual reason why you don't trust him (not the loan that no longer exists) then I'll have no choice but to remove my counter.

You seem to be two-faced about these things. When Vod rated me red after blackmailing me (he threatened to red-rate me unless I changed my rating of him), you sided with Vod. Looks like you're completely fine with Vod leaving provably dishonest ratings. Here is more about that case. Of course I understand that you want to protect that positive trust Vod has left you, so you don't want to piss off Vod which would make you lose it. Look what happened to me, when I told Vod I don't particularly trust him --even when it was in private!

All in all, I don't see why people should give much value to your thoughts about trust ratings or trust system, because you are inconsistent. This post is just a FYI to people.

I have first-hand knowledge of Bruno's loan status therefore I felt compelled to counter hilarious' negs. I have also suggested that someone who trusts you should counter Vod's neg against you. How is that not consistent?

Any DT member who trusts Anduck can counter Vod's rating if they feel that this is too harsh.

Also remember that suchmoon held that Gleb account (or still holds / has access?) a few days ago, so it's likely that suchmoon has some extra, private, interest in Gleb's ratings.

I control the Gleb Gamow account. There is nothing "private" about it as I publicly stated that fact, and there is no "interest" as I'm not using the account for anything nor do I intend to, regardless of its rating.

Now if you could please stop lying that would be awesome. Thank you.

Suchmoon said he gave the account back to op, but who knows who has access to that. I don't believe he got a signed message from him.

What account are you talking about? At no point did I have control of the Gage account. I still have control of the Gleb account.

I'm not interested in account sales, collateral, and all that shit so I just told DarkStar_ to return the account to Bruno and I never touched it. I wasn't even aware there was collateral when I offered to pay the loan. You can verify that with DS.

[Anduck]

Now if you could please stop lying that would be awesome. Thank you.

What have I lied about?

Btw, "suggested" != "can .. if they feel"

[hilariousetc]

Suchmoon said he gave the account back to op, but who knows who has access to that. I don't believe he got a signed message from him.

What account are you talking about? At no point did I have control of the Gage account. I still have control of the Gleb account.

The one that was given as collateral for the loan. You said here you haven't touched it:

I'm not interested in account sales, collateral, and all that shit so I just told DarkStar_ to return the account to Bruno and I never touched it. I wasn't even aware there was collateral when I offered to pay the loan. You can verify that with DS.

Why do you now have control of the Gleb account when wasn't it the Gage one that was given to Darkstar as collateral? If gleb didn't try sell or give away his accounts for loans then we wouldn't have all this issues and confusion in the first place.

[suchmoon]

Why do you now have control of the Gleb account when wasn't it the Gage one that was given to Darkstar as collateral? If gleb didn't try sell or give away his accounts for loans then we wouldn't have all this issues and confusion in the first place.

Two different accounts, two different deals. I control the Gleb Gamow account (my own deal with Bruno), I never touched the Phinnaeus Gage account (DarkStar_'s deal with Bruno).

[YuTü.Co.in]

Why do you now have control of the Gleb account when wasn't it the Gage one that was given to Darkstar as collateral? If gleb didn't try sell or give away his accounts for loans then we wouldn't have all this issues and confusion in the first place.

Two different accounts, two different deals. I control the Gleb Gamow account (my own deal with Bruno), I never touched the Phinnaeus Gage account (DarkStar_'s deal with Bruno).

After you try to spoon-feed hilarious' the truth and change his diaper, prior to putting him in his crib, have him take a look at this - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=2084637 - so he can add to it unless, than is, he's a chicken shit piece of ... fuck me!, i already said shit. Note to self: Think before you act.

Again to the community, I ended this episode after I concurred with hilarious, but he didn't want to drop it, opting to stick it further up my ass, continuing to do so today and most likely tomorrow. Not bad for a global moderator who wears the sig of a gambling site whose CEO started off as a mere gambler on the site, then in record time was made its CEO. To me, that doesn't smell right.

[suchmoon]

What have I lied about?

I consider your incessant use of fallacies intentional and I will therefore refer to it as lying. Feel free to correct me by admitting that you were simply mistaken in your reasoning.

Btw, "suggested" != "can .. if they feel"

NFI what that even means. Did I hurt your feelings?

[Anduck]

What have I lied about?

I consider your incessant use of fallacies intentional and I will therefore refer to it as lying. Feel free to correct me by admitting that you were simply mistaken in your reasoning.

Btw, "suggested" != "can .. if they feel"

NFI what that even means. Did I hurt your feelings?

My feelings are not related. You claimed to have done something you didn't. You did not suggest countering the rating. You implied you don't feel like countering it and if someone feels that it should be countered, you pointed out that they can do it.

I think that it's counterproductive to redefine meanings of words like "lie". What do you think?

[suchmoon]

My feelings are not related. You claimed to have done something you didn't. You did not suggest countering the rating. You implied you don't feel like countering it and if someone feels that it should be countered, you pointed out that they can do it.

I think that it's counterproductive to redefine meanings of words like "lie". What do you think?

I think you're lying. Get a dictionary.

And you're off-topic too.

[YuTü.Co.in]

Currently nobody gives a fuck about scammers

Then start giving a fuck. If you create credible scam accusation threads you can get DT members to tag those scams.

CoalCoin or TaTaTu, anyone? They're in the news.

[marlboroza]

Currently nobody gives a fuck about scammers

Then start giving a fuck. If you create credible scam accusation threads you can get DT members to tag those scams.

Digaran is DT investigator, not scam investigator 

[tmfp]

Currently nobody gives a fuck about scammers

Then start giving a fuck. If you create credible scam accusation threads you can get DT members to tag those scams.

Digaran is DT investigator, not scam investigator 

Far too much hard work to sift thru Google/Wayback/Companies House, translate document pdfs, find references, endure social media, do math and write a coherent argument why people shouldn't give other people their money.
Just sit on the sidelines, play silly forum games and feel relevant instead. And yell downstairs to your Mom for a pizza.