Main drawback of PoS is lower security compared to PoW.
For a new node that didn't witness the history of transactions, there is no way for it to determine which of the competing forks is the valid one.
Or in other words, there is no best (longest) chain.
If you can get addresses that held majority of the coins at any point in time, you can reorganize the blockchain.
I am using word "blockchain" loosely here, since there is no real reason for a PoS coin to store it's data in a chain, it can just have a single ledger of transactions. Keeping the history of transactions just increases the attack vector, unlike PoW where it increases the security.
PoS is made as an agreement, think a company deciding something based on votes of a stakeholder.
Losing your stake if you don't agree with most reminds me of politics in Soviet Union, where those politicians who sided with those who didn't win the vote would get shot. Kind of a dark analogy, but it is the first thing I think of.
These aren't analogies that explain the above issue that I mentioned, but more on what you described as what happens during consensus in these coins.
Thanks for that analogy I think I'll try to adapt that to something more work friendly when discussing it with others. I'll post it up here once I have made it.