Bitcoin Forum
December 15, 2017, 01:09:59 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.15.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Florida Targets High-Dollar Bitcoin Exchangers(localbitcoins.com)  (Read 774 times)
Crypto0
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54


View Profile
February 08, 2014, 03:20:05 AM
 #1

State authorities in Florida on Thursday announced criminal charges targeting three men who allegedly ran illegal businesses moving large amounts of cash in and out of the Bitcoin virtual currency. Experts say this is likely the first case in which Bitcoin vendors have been prosecuted under state anti-money laundering laws, and that prosecutions like these could shut down one of the last remaining avenues for purchasing Bitcoins anonymously.

http://krebsonsecurity.com/2014/02/florida-targets-high-dollar-bitcoin-exchangers/
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1513343399
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1513343399

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1513343399
Reply with quote  #2

1513343399
Report to moderator
odolvlobo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974



View Profile
February 10, 2014, 05:15:32 AM
 #2

You forgot the part where it says that they were knowingly selling bitcoins for illegal purposes. That's called money laundering.

Anyway, there are already a dozen threads that discuss this article and they even have links to the court documents. There is no need for another one.

Buy bitcoins with cash from somebody near you: LocalBitcoins
Join an anti-signature campaign: DannyHamilton's ignore list
Bitco
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 274



View Profile
February 10, 2014, 03:02:42 PM
 #3

The money transmitter charge is BS.  Selling bitcoins isn't money transmission.

The charge of money laundering for failing to report a transaction over $10000 is going to be harder to beat, but it could be challenged on Fourth or Fifth Amendment grounds.  In US v Miller (1976) the Supreme Court held that bank records were not subject to Fourth Amendment protection, but never said that people have to report themselves.

Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!