dbbit
|
|
February 09, 2014, 01:45:30 PM |
|
I actually see transaction with lots of confirmations (221), but also that don't make it to my wallet. E.g. 56aae6d0832c029f66bd5e61047fba0373e37c527ff90c95527bb3b7d866d687 Did the coin perhaps fork? Not sure why a TX with so many confirmations don't show up - never encountered that before. Never mind. For some reason my Wallet fell behind even though it said it was connected. I restarted it and all good now. For anybody else wanting to verify whether this is a problem, go to the debug window of the miner and type in 'getinfo'. Then compare the number of blocks your wallet thinks there are to the latest block on: http://max.cryptoexplore.com/
|
|
|
|
ghur
|
|
February 09, 2014, 01:48:38 PM |
|
I've been having trouble finding a pool that works well, but DwarfPool is behaving excellently. One of the few pools I'm able to get consistent and reliable shares in with cudaminer.
|
doge: D8q8dR6tEAcaJ7U65jP6AAkiiL2CFJaHah Automated faucet, pays daily: Qoinpro
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 09, 2014, 02:08:57 PM |
|
The transactions had been processed and sended to the maxcoin-network, but some of them did not have any acceptions in spite of fee. Because of overloaded maxcoin network (not of pool!) with a lot of transactions, there was some delay in payment.
BUT IT IS CORRECTED MEANWHILE FROM THE POOL SIDE. YOU MUST HAVE BEEN PAID COMPLETELY!
|
|
|
|
dbbit
|
|
February 10, 2014, 07:58:38 AM |
|
The pool seems to have stopped making any payouts about 4 hours ago (even though 9 blocks were founds since - 7 of them confirmed already).
Is something wrong?
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 10:04:00 AM |
|
The pool seems to have stopped making any payouts about 4 hours ago (even though 9 blocks were founds since - 7 of them confirmed already).
Is something wrong?
Dear members, I am terribly sorry for delay in payments!! This happened because of the other coin on the pool. The payouts work again!! Please check your accounts! the payouts for XXL-coin are temporarily suspended for a short time.. Thank you so much!!
|
|
|
|
mechx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 10:11:32 AM |
|
just a note, you need to update your website with this info, not everyone come here to check for late payment, people simply leave when there is no notice... the pool has been good but lost about 50K Mh in about 4 hours
|
|
|
|
blodyx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 10, 2014, 01:13:28 PM |
|
I like the pool! But a little news and information about you on the page would be good.
|
|
|
|
kwaaak
|
|
February 10, 2014, 02:30:35 PM Last edit: February 10, 2014, 04:22:35 PM by kwaaak |
|
I have 7.2% reject rate on this pool but the stats page only reports 75-80% of my actual hash rate. Are there any settings for this p2pool that will make it run better?
I am currently at: Queue 0, Scantime 1, Expiry 2, Intensity 13
Edit: 6.9% reject now
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 05:22:45 PM |
|
I have 7.2% reject rate on this pool but the stats page only reports 75-80% of my actual hash rate. Are there any settings for this p2pool that will make it run better?
I am currently at: Queue 0, Scantime 1, Expiry 2, Intensity 13
Edit: 6.9% reject now
Do you use the nearest server to you? Which hashrate do you have in your miner and on the page? DwarfPool is NOT p2pool! it's standalone selfdeveloped oneBy the way, the server stats only displays the rough approximate speed on the main page. But your payouts are calculated on the real sent shares.
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 05:25:41 PM |
|
I like the pool! But a little news and information about you on the page would be good.
Thank you for tips! What kind of information are you most interested in?
|
|
|
|
kwaaak
|
|
February 10, 2014, 05:27:05 PM |
|
Sorry for thinking it was a kind of p2pool I am using the France server (30ms), mining at 313MH/s and the pool says I have 238-242MH/s
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 07:26:21 PM |
|
Sorry for thinking it was a kind of p2pool I am using the France server (30ms), mining at 313MH/s and the pool says I have 238-242MH/s how many rejects does the miner show? can you please give the statistic from miner? thank you!
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 10, 2014, 07:31:16 PM Last edit: February 10, 2014, 10:14:46 PM by Atrides |
|
Our frontpage is just under attack, some users can feel it by opening our website slowly. But it does not tuch the function of pool and payouts, this is only webpage
Thanks for your understanding!
|
|
|
|
kwaaak
|
|
February 11, 2014, 04:10:09 AM |
|
As I said above: I have 7.2% reject rate on this pool Edit: 6.9% reject now
Just got this from my miner: Pool: stratum+tcp://erebor.dwarfpool.com:3339 Queued work requests: 3134 Share submissions: 45256 Accepted shares: 41999 Rejected shares: 3257 Accepted difficulty shares: 1343968 Rejected difficulty shares: 104224 Reject ratio: 7.2%
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 13, 2014, 10:58:24 AM |
|
As I said above: I have 7.2% reject rate on this pool Edit: 6.9% reject now
I tested yestarday there are much less rejects! Next, we moved to another server, so dwarves must be quicker now There is another nice feature on the site, prices from the stock exchanges implemented.
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 13, 2014, 11:01:31 AM |
|
I'd like to remind, Dwarves' Support is also available in German and Russian!
Herzlich willkommen auf unser Pool!
Здecь вaм paды, пpиcoeдиняйтecь!
|
|
|
|
|
dbbit
|
|
February 14, 2014, 08:47:57 AM |
|
Sorry for thinking it was a kind of p2pool I am using the France server (30ms), mining at 313MH/s and the pool says I have 238-242MH/s how many rejects does the miner show? can you please give the statistic from miner? thank you! Same here, I'm mining at ~2000 and pool says ~1600. I have reject rates between 0.6% and 1.4% - that doesn't explain a 20% underreporting. What gives? Is this because of no-submit-stale? (i.e. is stale shares displayed in the cgminer hashrate?)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPU 0: 73.0C 50% | 221.8M/221.8Mh/s | R:0.6% HW:0 WU: 50.3/m T:1 I:14 GPU 1: 74.0C 1862RPM | 145.0M/145.1Mh/s | R:0.6% HW:0 WU: 31.3/m T:1 I:14 GPU 2: 73.0C 19% | 303.5M/303.5Mh/s | R:0.5% HW:0 WU: 66.8/m T:1 I:14 GPU 3: 74.0C 2640RPM | 198.1M/198.1Mh/s | R:1.4% HW:0 WU: 44.7/m T:1 I:14 GPU 4: 74.0C 2048RPM | 211.2M/211.2Mh/s | R:0.6% HW:0 WU: 46.1/m T:1 I:14 GPU 5: 74.0C 2844RPM | 303.5M/303.5Mh/s | R:1.0% HW:0 WU: 68.4/m T:1 I:14 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPU 0: 73.0C 3647RPM | 456.7M/457.7Mh/s | R:0.8% HW:0 WU:101.9/m T:1 I:14 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [2014-02-14 00:44:15] accepted: 7918/7970 (99.35%), 66103 khash/s (yay!!!) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GPU 0: 73.0C 3081RPM | 131.8M/132.0Mh/s | R:0.8% HW:0 WU:27.7/m T:1 I:14 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
Mk2vr6
|
|
February 14, 2014, 11:01:14 AM |
|
Have you updated to implement GRUMPY's KGW at 20333?
|
|
|
|
Atrides (OP)
|
|
February 14, 2014, 12:14:56 PM |
|
Have you updated to implement GRUMPY's KGW at 20333?
Yes, I have updated to new version overall
|
|
|
|
|