According to TP it's OK to tag hacked accounts.

[digaran]

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=134027
Is it OK to tag people based on the quality of their posts? I want to know this.

[1714171207]

1714171207

[1714171207]

1714171207

[1714171207]

1714171207

[Lauda]

This is a bought or hacked account.

That's what the tag is based on, and it is appropriate.

PM me or bitmessage me if you are in need for CAD in large volumes - ratings available, rates negotiable. Canada Only.
-snip-

Pretty much confirms it.

[Flying Hellfish]

This is a bought or hacked account.

That's what the tag is based on, and it is appropriate.

PM me or bitmessage me if you are in need for CAD in large volumes - ratings available, rates negotiable. Canada Only.
-snip-

Pretty much confirms it.

Only in digaran's deluded mind is

This is a bought or hacked account.

the same thing as

The Pharmacist is tagging shitposters with negative trust!

[digaran]

What do you mean.Atfirst you don't have any quality post yet.What is wrong with calling as Sir?!!!! 

Your posts are so bad that no one should ever accept you into a campaign.  In addition to that, your account is obviously purchased or hacked.  The posts made in 2013 have no resemblance to the bullshit you currently spew out. 

I've tagged you accordingly.

[actmyname]

What do you mean.Atfirst you don't have any quality post yet.What is wrong with calling as Sir?!!!! 

Your posts are so bad that no one should ever accept you into a campaign.  In addition to that, your account is obviously purchased or hacked.  The posts made in 2013 have no resemblance to the bullshit you currently spew out. 

I've tagged you accordingly.

Please read.

[marlboroza]

Is it OK to tag people based on the quality of their posts?

No.

[pugman]

Is it OK to tag people based on the quality of their posts? I want to know this.

theymos has said no, and that is why merit system was created. Default Trust system is for tagging spammers. Stop creating a thread for literally everything and learn to read.

/thread

[digaran]

Is it OK to tag people based on the quality of their posts? I want to know this.

theymos has said no, and that is why merit system was created. Default Trust system is for tagging spammers. Stop creating a thread for literally everything and learn to read.

/thread

Did you mean "scammers"? if default trust system is to identify scammers then could you please tell me who got scammed by me to deserve several red trust tags? maybe DT means differently for every and each case? because my tags are based on certain people not trusting me, they're not there to warn people of me being a scammer.

About this thread however, TP is literally tagging shitposters who'd try to join signature campaigns, if you check this tag and the quote above you'll see that he is comparing the post quality before and after a certain timeframe, so basically he is tagging this person for their low post quality and there is no reference link.

[The Sceptical Chymist]

Digaran, you are either being incredibly dense or cherrypicking things in order to advance your agenda.

As others have correctly pointed out, I did not tag that guy for being a shitposter but for buying the account (or hacking it).  The change in post quality from excellent--->standard shitposter would not happen naturally with time, and therefore I am absolutely certain the account was bought or hacked, hence the feedback.

It also had nothing to do with the fact that he was trying to get into a signature campaign.  I just happened to be reading that campaign thread and he'd called attention to himself with his nonsense, so I decided to take a look at his post history.  Glad I did.

Stop trolling, dude.  It's tiresome.

[digaran]

Basically you have tagged that user for their low quality posts, but it's OK man, keep at bullying others and stay out of some cases where you know the other party has some kind of influence and they could actually fight back. this isn't right.
They have no power over you so whatever you do to them it's on you, and someday you'll have to answer for your sins. you are no different than suchmoon, actmyname and sadly Lauda not to mention the boss of bullies Vod.

[actmyname]

Basically you have tagged that user for their low quality posts, but it's OK man, keep at bullying others and stay out of some cases where you know the other party has some kind of influence and they could actually fight back. this isn't right.

So, if all of the sudden, nullius starts posting the following in Economics:

i believe that the bitcoin price will have going up we are just in a corrections this will end soon by the end of year and we will be moon again

This doesn't deserve a tag? This doesn't show that the account very likely changed hands?

Who the hell would change their post quality this much?

[suchmoon]

Is it OK to tag people based on the quality of their posts? I want to know this.

This is a bought or hacked account.

That's what the tag is based on, and it is appropriate.

account is obviously purchased or hacked.

he is tagging this person for their low post quality

I am absolutely certain the account was bought or hacked, hence the feedback.

Basically you have tagged that user for their low quality posts

After this I feel like I need to read some doge haikus to restore my IQ.

Basically you have tagged that user for their low quality posts, but it's OK man, keep at bullying others and stay out of some cases where you know the other party has some kind of influence and they could actually fight back. this isn't right.

So, if all of the sudden, nullius starts posting the following in Economics:

i believe that the bitcoin price will have going up we are just in a corrections this will end soon by the end of year and we will be moon again

This doesn't deserve a tag? This doesn't show that the account very likely changed hands?

Who the hell would change their post quality this much?

I missed the "if" on my first read... you scared me.

digaran turning on one person who was willing to give him some benefit of the doubt is kinda amusing though. Dude is totally batshit.

[actmyname]

I missed the "if" on my first read... you scared me.

Just shows how great I am at mimicking shitposting. I must be a closet sig-spammer.Offtopic: I am sad that nullius hasn't been around in quite a while. I miss reading those huge posts

[marlboroza]

~

Oh, another digaran's never ending loop.

~
TP is literally tagging shitposters who'd try to join signature campaigns, if you check this tag and the quote above you'll see that he is comparing the post quality before and after a certain timeframe, so basically he is tagging this person for their low post quality and there is no reference link.

Who did they tag for shitposting?
I can't find it in this topic, can you point me to part of topic where I can find -ve for shitposting?

[digaran]

Who did they tag for shitposting?
I can't find it in this topic, can you point me to part of topic where I can find -ve for shitposting?

but have become typical 3rd world bounty-hunter shitposts.

The Pharmacist has problem with people trying to earn money, if a member is a shitposter, the campaign managers are the ones responsible not allowing such members to participate, if a member is breaking forum rules you should report them to the mods. he has a problem with the level of English skill of members for example, he didn't tag Gleb and his alt accounts because Gleb has some of the DT members such as suchmoon and Tomatocage on his side. what would you call a person like TP? I'd call such a person a coward and a bully. I'm starting to change my mind about him.

[marlboroza]

Who did they tag for shitposting?
I can't find it in this topic, can you point me to part of topic where I can find -ve for shitposting?

but have become typical 3rd world bounty-hunter shitposts.

The Pharmacist has problem with people trying to earn money, if a member is a shitposter, the campaign managers are the ones responsible not allowing such members to participate, if a member is breaking forum rules you should report them to the mods. he has a problem with the level of English skill of members for example, he didn't tag Gleb and his alt accounts because Gleb has some of the DT members such as suchmoon and Tomatocage on his side. what would you call a person like TP? I'd call such a person a coward and a bully. I'm starting to change my mind about him.

~
Who did they tag for shitposting?
I can't find it in this topic, can you point me to part of topic where I can find -ve for shitposting?

In case you missed it.

[suchmoon]

he didn't tag Gleb and his alt accounts because Gleb has some of the DT members such as suchmoon and Tomatocage on his side. what would you call a person like TP? I'd call such a person a coward and a bully.

I was wondering how you're gonna link this to your personal vendetta.

Be a man, digaran, attack me directly. Don't take it out on others.

[digaran]

I would like to ask for help from good and vigilant forum members.
Here is how you could contribute:

Compare the writing styles and English skills of high ranking forum members from the past until present and if there is a drop in the quality of their posts, like turning from a somewhat good writer into a garbage poster please make sure to report these members so that DT members such as Lauda and The Pharmacist could tag them red in order to stop them from posting garbage with bought, hacked accounts and make reading the forum posts difficult for the rest of us.
We have a green light from several DT members as we can read their posts on this topic, I'll lock this thread and a special thanks to The Pharmacist for helping the community even though people talk like shit to you including myself, and I'd like to apologize for talking to you that way.