Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 06:03:31 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »  All
  Print  
Author Topic: We need Reverse Transactions  (Read 4012 times)
whyinvestinbitcoin (OP)
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 34
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 12:52:09 PM
 #1

One of the so-called features or benefits of bitcoin is the lack of any reverse transactions. But in many respects this is a great failing. Wouldn't it be better that if you voluntarily identify you as a legal entity holding a wallet address and that if you did not authorise a transaction (i.e. it was stolen or the goods weren't delivered) that there is a method to reverse that transaction?

What if you could submit that a transaction was illegal to the network and for a miners fee of say 10%, the transaction could be reversed by consensus? And that for addresses that are less trusted that becomes automatic but for highly trusted or fully identified addresses that goes to arbitration by one of many authorities/group of people to determine the validity?

To me, the KEY feature for bitcoin is the de-centralisation and limited quantity of units. But we need traditional services that the financial institutions currently provide for it to be useful. One feature is reverse transactions. without it is a hinderance to progress and why it exists to begin with.

Many scammers on this board I'm sure will happily protest to the idea. It doesn't work to their benefit. Is there any work being done on reverse-transactions in bitcoin?
1714241011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714241011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714241011
Reply with quote  #2

1714241011
Report to moderator
1714241011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714241011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714241011
Reply with quote  #2

1714241011
Report to moderator
Make sure you back up your wallet regularly! Unlike a bank account, nobody can help you if you lose access to your BTC.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714241011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714241011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714241011
Reply with quote  #2

1714241011
Report to moderator
1714241011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714241011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714241011
Reply with quote  #2

1714241011
Report to moderator
1714241011
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714241011

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714241011
Reply with quote  #2

1714241011
Report to moderator
arkintunde
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 32
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 01:09:55 PM
 #2

I don't think this would work. Despite all validation and "trust" what is to stop you from reversing a legitimate transaction? This is the problem with Credit Cards. I can roll out to a any bar strip in the country and spend up a hefty bill, call my credit card company the next day and say all of these transactions were unauthorized without ever seeing any of those vendors. You can't do that with cash...you can't do that with Bitcoin. If you want your transaction reversed, it's up to You and the Receiver. That's it. Not some mediation company who will favor one or the other.
guybrushthreepwood
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1232
Merit: 1195



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 01:13:48 PM
 #3

What's to stop people from claiming any transaction was fraudulent? This would essentially just turn it into PayPal. Maybe we need some two factor authentication and better security features on wallets though.
Lauda
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 2965


Terminated.


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 01:15:45 PM
 #4

No we don't need this. Stop trying to become Paypal v2. This just gives people more opportunities to scam.

"The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks"
😼 Bitcoin Core (onion)
BitcoinBobbeh
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:00:43 PM
 #5

What's to stop people from claiming any transaction was fraudulent?

This.

If any transaction can be overturned by a miners' consensus what's to stop leaders of large mining pools from simply stealing all the fucking coins?

By the end of next month at the latest we will have permanently left behind 3 digits. You can quote me on this.
AndOneBtc
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:05:04 PM
 #6

paypal v2 alert
hilariousandco
Global Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3794
Merit: 2615


Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:12:44 PM
 #7

Very bad idea. If you want this sort of protection use escrow or a payment processor that offers this protection. Just look how bad Paypal is defrauded.

  ▄▄███████▄███████▄▄▄
 █████████████
▀▀▀▀▀▀████▄▄
███████████████
       ▀▀███▄
███████████████
          ▀███
 █████████████
             ███
███████████▀▀               ███
███                         ███
███                         ███
 ███                       ███
  ███▄                   ▄███
   ▀███▄▄             ▄▄███▀
     ▀▀████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄████▀▀
         ▀▀▀███████▀▀▀
░░░████▄▄▄▄
░▄▄░
▄▄███████▄▀█████▄▄
██▄████▌▐█▌█████▄██
████▀▄▄▄▌███░▄▄▄▀████
██████▄▄▄█▄▄▄██████
█░███████░▐█▌░███████░█
▀▀██▀░██░▐█▌░██░▀██▀▀
▄▄▄░█▀░█░██░▐█▌░██░█░▀█░▄▄▄
██▀░░░░▀██░▐█▌░██▀░░░░▀██
▀██
█████▄███▀▀██▀▀███▄███████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
▀▀▀▀███████████▀▀▀▀
▄▄██████▄▄
▀█▀
█  █▀█▀
  ▄█  ██  █▄  ▄
█ ▄█ █▀█▄▄█▀█ █▄ █
▀▄█ █ ███▄▄▄▄███ █ █▄▀
▀▀ █    ▄▄▄▄    █ ▀▀
   ██████   █
█     ▀▀     █
▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄▀▄
▄ ██████▀▀██████ ▄
▄████████ ██ ████████▄
▀▀███████▄▄███████▀▀
▀▀▀████████▀▀▀
█████████████LEADING CRYPTO SPORTSBOOK & CASINO█████████████
MULTI
CURRENCY
1500+
CASINO GAMES
CRYPTO EXCLUSIVE
CLUBHOUSE
FAST & SECURE
PAYMENTS
.
..PLAY NOW!..
kevindurant
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:27:20 PM
 #8

No, we don't need this. It's very bad idea. Go use Paypal if you want chargebacks.

justusranvier
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1400
Merit: 1009



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:28:04 PM
 #9

Feel free to invent your own currency with this feature and leave Bitcoin alone.
exstasie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1806
Merit: 1521


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:32:36 PM
 #10

No we don't need this. Stop trying to become Paypal v2. This just gives people more opportunities to scam.

Yeah, we don't want to give people any more opportunities.  That is one of the biggest downfalls with PayPal in terms of fraud.  How can you every do any P2P transactions when the transaction can be reversed.

rix5
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 271
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:34:14 PM
 #11

it's just creating a huge mess. learn to secure your shit instead of blaiming btc. reverse transactions will also lead to scam and theft. just in another way.

edit: if you are not able to care for the security of your btc then maybe you really should use paypal instead.
Mitchell
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3906
Merit: 2197


Verified awesomeness ✔


View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 02:34:35 PM
 #12

No. Piss off. We don't need that shit in Bitcoin.

.
Duelbits
            ▄████▄▄
          ▄█████████▄
        ▄█████████████▄
     ▄██████████████████▄
   ▄████▄▄▄█████████▄▄▄███▄
 ▄████▐▀▄▄▀▌████▐▀▄▄▀▌██

 ██████▀▀▀▀███████▀▀▀▀█████

▐████████████■▄▄▄■██████████▀
▐██████████████████████████▀
██████████████████████████▀
▀███████████████████████▀
  ▀███████████████████▀
    ▀███████████████▀
.
         ▄ ▄▄▀▀▀▀▄▄
         ▄▀▀▄      █
         █   ▀▄     █
       ▄█▄     ▀▄   █
      ▄▀ ▀▄      ▀█▀
    ▄▀     ▀█▄▄▄▀▀ ▀
  ▄▀  ▄▀  ▄▀

Live Games

   ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄▄
 ▄▀ ▄▄▀▀▀▀▀▄▄ ▀▄
▄▀ █ ▄  █  ▄ █ ▀▄
█ █   ▀   ▀   █ █  ▄▄▄
█ ▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀ █ █   █
█▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀█  █▄█
█ ▀▀█  ▀▀█  ▀▀█ █  █▄█

Slots
.
        ▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄
        █         ▄▄  █
▄▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▀▄       █
█  ▄▄         █       █
█             █       █
█   ▄▀▀▄▀▀▄   █       █
█   ▀▄   ▄▀   █       █

Blackjack
|█▀▀▀▀▀█▄▄▄
       ▀████▄▄
         ██████▄
▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄█▀    ▀▀█
████████▄        █
█████████▄        █
██████████▄     ▄██
█████████▀▀▀█▄▄████
▀▀███▀▀       ████
   █          ███
   █          █▀
▄█████▄▄▄ ▄▄▀▀
███████▀▀▀
.
                 NEW!                  
SPORTS BETTING 
|||
[ Đ ][ Ł ]
AVAILABLE NOW

Advertisements are not endorsed by me.
satosh007
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:36:02 PM
 #13

Feel free to invent your own currency with this feature and leave Bitcoin alone.
well said Yep Smiley

BitCoinDream
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2324
Merit: 1204

The revolution will be digital


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 02:37:36 PM
 #14

One of the so-called features or benefits of bitcoin is the lack of any reverse transactions. But in many respects this is a great failing. Wouldn't it be better that if you voluntarily identify you as a legal entity holding a wallet address and that if you did not authorise a transaction (i.e. it was stolen or the goods weren't delivered) that there is a method to reverse that transaction?

What if you could submit that a transaction was illegal to the network and for a miners fee of say 10%, the transaction could be reversed by consensus? And that for addresses that are less trusted that becomes automatic but for highly trusted or fully identified addresses that goes to arbitration by one of many authorities/group of people to determine the validity?

To me, the KEY feature for bitcoin is the de-centralisation and limited quantity of units. But we need traditional services that the financial institutions currently provide for it to be useful. One feature is reverse transactions. without it is a hinderance to progress and why it exists to begin with.

Many scammers on this board I'm sure will happily protest to the idea. It doesn't work to their benefit. Is there any work being done on reverse-transactions in bitcoin?

I dont care if u call me a SCAMMER, but I am hereby protesting your idea. Rather I am suggesting you to stay out of Bitcoin. FIAT money will work better for you. I dont really feel the necessity of explaining you the reason of protesting reversibility in the light of Satoshi's paper. Because, in your eye, he's a scammer too......

LostDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
February 11, 2014, 03:38:34 PM
 #15

No. Piss off. We don't need that shit in Bitcoin.

Very well put!

Thank you for your insightful post!

My $.02.

Wink

Corporations For Crypto
Protect Your Assets and Reduce Your Tax Liability With A Kansas Corporation!
We Demand Justice From BFL
EchoingUprise
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:13:21 PM
 #16

I agree with everyone else. It is not needed in the bitcoin world. It would also probably take a good bit of code rework to even allow this.
vpitcher07
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 342
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:17:41 PM
 #17

No no no no no no and no. Nope absolutely not. nope. Did i get my opinion across?

Bitcoin: The currency of liberty
1HBJSf3Lm9i8KxjZ7fuoN9FJ8hniniFbv4
vpitcher07
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 342
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:18:11 PM
 #18

Fun thing, this is included in the protocol.
There is a reversibility option.

Um what?

Bitcoin: The currency of liberty
1HBJSf3Lm9i8KxjZ7fuoN9FJ8hniniFbv4
DeathAndTaxes
Donator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1079


Gerald Davis


View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:20:36 PM
 #19

Bitcoin is cash.  Is cash reversible? No.

However that doesn't mean payment systems can't be built ON TOP OF Bitcoin.

VISA isn't a currency, VISA is a payment system built on top of USD cash system.
_____ isn't a currency, ____ is a (future) payment system built on top of BTC cash system.
retrend
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 251



View Profile
February 11, 2014, 04:29:55 PM
 #20

If people are involved in transactions with untrusted parties, they should pay for an escrow service.  It shouldn't be built into the system itself.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 »  All
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!