[pandacoin] The Panda Coin ♥ Scrypt Adaptive-N w/Kimotos Gravity Well ★

[darkpandora]

What is the best setting for r9 290? And is it profitable to mine pandacoin?
I have 19 290 cards and currently mining leafcoin at 15800 Khash/s.

[roundmaster]

What wrong there? two separate p2pool networks for panda? Its ok? I don't see the same payment address on both pools.
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/
http://blok.afraid.org:8169/static/

The patch available was setup before, and the hashrate is higher... Someone ask for the repository that appeared lately to be updated, but the repository is still out of sync...

The patch of 'vtc' p2pool is the right move.

[SackofBits]

What is the best setting for r9 290? And is it profitable to mine pandacoin?
I have 19 290 cards and currently mining leafcoin at 15800 Khash/s.

is there a hole in your finger? 

[derbrause]

What wrong there? two separate p2pool networks for panda? Its ok? I don't see the same payment address on both pools.
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/
http://blok.afraid.org:8169/static/

The patch available was setup before, and the hashrate is higher... Someone ask for the repository that appeared lately to be updated, but the repository is still out of sync...

The patch of 'vtc' p2pool is the right move.

Once again - Yes - the hashrate is higher BUT there are disadvantages for smallhash-miners in that patch... lets just use the actual one (which we are using currently with ~4mhash) and we are set for the 11 mhash :-)!!!!

https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda

http://bk-eu.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://bk-us.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://panda.qemulab.com:9190/static/
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/

[Blazed]

We all know this is an obvious pump/dump coin...who cares.  If it is pre mined it is garbage...just profit and move a long. 

[roundmaster]

The thing is that the above posted patch is a pain in the ass for every miner with a lower hashrate as these guys are using "THE OLD" vertcoin patch - not the actual one.

I would recommend to use this repo https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda as there is no disadvantage for smaller miners... lets huddle guys....
this is scrypt-n - there are a lot of "slow hasher" out there :|

Please use the patch above. A higher hashrate is better for all. P2pool share computing is fair. The patch uses a shorter period of time, this is better too. Do you really want to wait 24h to get the share ratio you are waiting for? And two days for a block?

[jox]

What wrong there? two separate p2pool networks for panda? Its ok? I don't see the same payment address on both pools.
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/
http://blok.afraid.org:8169/static/

The patch available was setup before, and the hashrate is higher... Someone ask for the repository that appeared lately to be updated, but the repository is still out of sync...

The patch of 'vtc' p2pool is the right move.

Once again - Yes - the hashrate is higher BUT there are disadvantages for smallhash-miners in that patch... lets just use the actual one (which we are using currently with ~4mhash) and we are set for the 11 mhash :-)!!!!

https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda

http://bk-eu.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://bk-us.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://panda.qemulab.com:9190/static/
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/

This one?? https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda, I supply my 3.5Mh/s there. I run it 2 hours behind.

[phaddie]

If we wanted to make a quick buck, everyone involved in the IPO would have dumped within 6 hours when the coin traded at 3-4x IPO price. Long-term vision my friends...don't hate just b/c you missed the boat.

The whole world of crypto is buyer beware. Do research, make educated decisions, live with the results.  Don't piss on other peoples' parades (at least not in this forum)

This.  I don't get why everyone is so mad :p

i'm convinced that the crypto community is just as angry and negative as the poker community who shit on people for how they play. no one is happy in this world.

wait a second, this also sounds like the video game community who shit on people for how they play.

nope,nope,nope..  It sounds like an internet forum.  Which, other than the topic of the board itself, all read the same way.

First post:

My opinion:

Next 1.2 million posts:

WRONG.

Phad.

[Kam800]

If we wanted to make a quick buck, everyone involved in the IPO would have dumped within 6 hours when the coin traded at 3-4x IPO price.

And the good news is that PANDA is still trading at 3-4x IPO price despite miners dumping on the market.
Nethash rate is ~4.5Ghs on an N-Scrypt based coin, equivalent to ~9Ghs for scrypt. Prices are holding steady across all exchanges hosting the coin and volume of trades are very high.

There's a huge amount of interest here. Mid to long term this could translate very well.

And the people hating on this are doing pretty well at pumping this thread - keep up the good work!

[miningcoinz]

when are we going to other exchanges?

[blockjoe]

*p2pool


Here is a patch to get a public thepandacoin p2pool node,  this patch applies to the original vertcoin p2pool code (git clone git://github.com/donSchoe/p2pool-vtc).

You may setup your own p2pool node. You will get a low latency, low dead on arrival stratum server, and no fees....


p2pool

diff -r -u /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140217/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py p2pool-vtccoins-20140217/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py
--- /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py   2014-02-15 15:45:28.000000000 +0100
+++ p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py   2014-02-17 19:02:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -252,6 +252,29 @@
         DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
         DUST_THRESHOLD=0.03e8,
     ),
+
+    thepandacoin=math.Object(
+        P2P_PREFIX='fabfb5da'.decode('hex'),
+        P2P_PORT=8889,
+        ADDRESS_VERSION=56,
+        RPC_PORT=5888,
+        RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
+            'thepandacoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
+            not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
+        )),
+        SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 50*100000000 >> (height + 1)//840000,
+        POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('vtc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
+        BLOCK_PERIOD=150, # s
+        SYMBOL='PANDA',
+        CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'Thepandacoin') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/Thepandacoin/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.thepandacoin'), 'thepandacoin.conf'),
+        BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://explorer.thepandacoin.org/block/',
+        ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://explorer.thepandacoin.org/address/',
+        TX_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://explorer.thepandacoin.org/tx/',
+        SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//1000000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
+        DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
+        DUST_THRESHOLD=0.03e8,
+    ),
+
 )
 for net_name, net in nets.iteritems():
     net.NAME = net_name
diff -r -u /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py
--- /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py   2014-02-16 11:28:40.000000000 +0100
+++ p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py   2014-02-17 19:06:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -160,6 +160,26 @@
         ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#cachecoin-bots',
         VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
     ),
+
+    thepandacoin=math.Object(
+        PARENT=networks.nets['thepandacoin'],
+        SHARE_PERIOD=15, # seconds
+        CHAIN_LENGTH=1*60*60//10, # shares
+        REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=1*60*60//10, # shares
+        TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares
+        SPREAD=12, # blocks
+        IDENTIFIER='a06a81c827ca8129'.decode('hex'),
+        PREFIX='7c3614a6bcdc4192'.decode('hex'),
+        P2P_PORT=18187,
+        MIN_TARGET=4,
+        MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
+        PERSIST=False,
+        WORKER_PORT=8169,
+        BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='rock.awiki.org wolf.awiki.org'.split(' '),
+        ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#p2pool-vtc',
+        VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
+    ),
+
 )
 for net_name, net in nets.iteritems():
     net.NAME = net_name

Good, I switch to p2pool, as soon as my config is operational.

Work fine! Thanks.

There is no disadvantage for smaller miner with this patch. The repository is bad, it uses a huge window, you will have to wait 24h to get the payout ratio your are expecting... A higher MH/s is more blocks and less statistical varation - that's all!

[derbrause]

What wrong there? two separate p2pool networks for panda? Its ok? I don't see the same payment address on both pools.
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/
http://blok.afraid.org:8169/static/

The patch available was setup before, and the hashrate is higher... Someone ask for the repository that appeared lately to be updated, but the repository is still out of sync...

The patch of 'vtc' p2pool is the right move.

Once again - Yes - the hashrate is higher BUT there are disadvantages for smallhash-miners in that patch... lets just use the actual one (which we are using currently with ~4mhash) and we are set for the 11 mhash :-)!!!!

https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda

http://bk-eu.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://bk-us.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://panda.qemulab.com:9190/static/
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/

This one?? https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda, I supply my 3.5Mh/s there. I run it 2 hours behind.

Welcome to the good guys on the right side ... we have cookies! and pandas... for small AND big hash miners

[ozie]

The thing is that the above posted patch is a pain in the ass for every miner with a lower hashrate as these guys are using "THE OLD" vertcoin patch - not the actual one.

I would recommend to use this repo https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda as there is no disadvantage for smaller miners... lets huddle guys....
this is scrypt-n - there are a lot of "slow hasher" out there :|

Please use the patch above. A higher hashrate is better for all. P2pool share computing is fair. The patch uses a shorter period of time, this is better too. Do you really want to wait 24h to get the share ratio you are waiting for? And two days for a block?

Well the Vertcoin Guys didnt made the P2Pool Fork just for fun and to see if it works!

And u dont have to wait 24 Hours to get a share. In fact with 100 kh/s u get one after 20 mins and then a solid payout over the next 24 Blocks!

I dont mind u having your own P2Pool setting.

I just like to roll with the settings that are proven right now in a 300mh/s P2Pool with 80% Luck!!!!!

[blockjoe]

What wrong there? two separate p2pool networks for panda? Its ok? I don't see the same payment address on both pools.
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/
http://blok.afraid.org:8169/static/

The patch available was setup before, and the hashrate is higher... Someone ask for the repository that appeared lately to be updated, but the repository is still out of sync...

The patch of 'vtc' p2pool is the right move.

Once again - Yes - the hashrate is higher BUT there are disadvantages for smallhash-miners in that patch... lets just use the actual one (which we are using currently with ~4mhash) and we are set for the 11 mhash :-)!!!!

https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda

http://bk-eu.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://bk-us.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://panda.qemulab.com:9190/static/
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/

This one?? https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda, I supply my 3.5Mh/s there. I run it 2 hours behind.

Please uses the patch splitting is an issue, and the payout ratio convergence is faster.

[blockjoe]

*p2pool


Here is a patch to get a public thepandacoin p2pool node,  this patch applies to the original vertcoin p2pool code (git clone git://github.com/donSchoe/p2pool-vtc).

You may setup your own p2pool node. You will get a low latency, low dead on arrival stratum server, and no fees....


p2pool

diff -r -u /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140217/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py p2pool-vtccoins-20140217/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py
--- /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py   2014-02-15 15:45:28.000000000 +0100
+++ p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/bitcoin/networks.py   2014-02-17 19:02:53.000000000 +0100
@@ -252,6 +252,29 @@
         DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
         DUST_THRESHOLD=0.03e8,
     ),
+
+    thepandacoin=math.Object(
+        P2P_PREFIX='fabfb5da'.decode('hex'),
+        P2P_PORT=8889,
+        ADDRESS_VERSION=56,
+        RPC_PORT=5888,
+        RPC_CHECK=defer.inlineCallbacks(lambda bitcoind: defer.returnValue(
+            'thepandacoinaddress' in (yield bitcoind.rpc_help()) and
+            not (yield bitcoind.rpc_getinfo())['testnet']
+        )),
+        SUBSIDY_FUNC=lambda height: 50*100000000 >> (height + 1)//840000,
+        POW_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('vtc_scrypt').getPoWHash(data)),
+        BLOCK_PERIOD=150, # s
+        SYMBOL='PANDA',
+        CONF_FILE_FUNC=lambda: os.path.join(os.path.join(os.environ['APPDATA'], 'Thepandacoin') if platform.system() == 'Windows' else os.path.expanduser('~/Library/Application Support/Thepandacoin/') if platform.system() == 'Darwin' else os.path.expanduser('~/.thepandacoin'), 'thepandacoin.conf'),
+        BLOCK_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://explorer.thepandacoin.org/block/',
+        ADDRESS_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://explorer.thepandacoin.org/address/',
+        TX_EXPLORER_URL_PREFIX='http://explorer.thepandacoin.org/tx/',
+        SANE_TARGET_RANGE=(2**256//1000000000 - 1, 2**256//1000 - 1),
+        DUMB_SCRYPT_DIFF=2**16,
+        DUST_THRESHOLD=0.03e8,
+    ),
+
 )
 for net_name, net in nets.iteritems():
     net.NAME = net_name
diff -r -u /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py
--- /dosr/src/p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py   2014-02-16 11:28:40.000000000 +0100
+++ p2pool-vtccoins-20140127/p2pool/networks.py   2014-02-17 19:06:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -160,6 +160,26 @@
         ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#cachecoin-bots',
         VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
     ),
+
+    thepandacoin=math.Object(
+        PARENT=networks.nets['thepandacoin'],
+        SHARE_PERIOD=15, # seconds
+        CHAIN_LENGTH=1*60*60//10, # shares
+        REAL_CHAIN_LENGTH=1*60*60//10, # shares
+        TARGET_LOOKBEHIND=200, # shares
+        SPREAD=12, # blocks
+        IDENTIFIER='a06a81c827ca8129'.decode('hex'),
+        PREFIX='7c3614a6bcdc4192'.decode('hex'),
+        P2P_PORT=18187,
+        MIN_TARGET=4,
+        MAX_TARGET=2**256//2**20 - 1,
+        PERSIST=False,
+        WORKER_PORT=8169,
+        BOOTSTRAP_ADDRS='rock.awiki.org wolf.awiki.org'.split(' '),
+        ANNOUNCE_CHANNEL='#p2pool-vtc',
+        VERSION_CHECK=lambda v: True,
+    ),
+
 )
 for net_name, net in nets.iteritems():
     net.NAME = net_name

Good, I switch to p2pool, as soon as my config is operational.

Work fine! Thanks.

There is no disadvantage for smaller miner with this patch. The repository is bad, it uses a huge window, you will have to wait 24h to get the payout ratio your are expecting... A higher MH/s is more blocks and less statistical varation - that's all!

The parameters are close to the one used by vercoin; these parameters will work fine with  300MH/s or more...

[ozie]

Please uses the patch splitting is an issue, and the payout ratio convergence is faster.

There is no Problem with two P2Pool Networks running on the same Coin.
They dont interfer each other.

If you dont know this you maybe should not fiddle with the P2Pool Settings  

[delusiona1]

bump

[BitcoinCharlie]

There's a huge amount of interest here. Mid to long term this could translate very well.

And the people hating on this are doing pretty well at pumping this thread - keep up the good work!

LMAO

Tru dat!

[jox]

What wrong there? two separate p2pool networks for panda? Its ok? I don't see the same payment address on both pools.
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/
http://blok.afraid.org:8169/static/

The patch available was setup before, and the hashrate is higher... Someone ask for the repository that appeared lately to be updated, but the repository is still out of sync...

The patch of 'vtc' p2pool is the right move.

Once again - Yes - the hashrate is higher BUT there are disadvantages for smallhash-miners in that patch... lets just use the actual one (which we are using currently with ~4mhash) and we are set for the 11 mhash :-)!!!!

https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda

http://bk-eu.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://bk-us.cloudapp.net:9190/static/
http://panda.qemulab.com:9190/static/
http://freebtc.eu:9190/static/

This one?? https://github.com/TheoRettisch/p2pool-panda, I supply my 3.5Mh/s there. I run it 2 hours behind.

Please uses the patch splitting is an issue, and the payout ratio convergence is faster.

ok, I download it again and running now on port 9190, before was 8169. But still ist there some old p2pool nodes with 8Mh/s.

[roundmaster]

any public p2pool nodes ?

http://bk-eu.cloudapp.net:8169/static/ seems to be down ;/

You may use this one: http://blok.afraid.org:8169/static, This server will stay operational.

You may use the ones above.