blockjoe
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
February 18, 2014, 01:52:42 PM |
|
As it has been said before, derbrause. If you have kept the p2pool parameters available before, a lot of more blocks will be there. Splitting p2pool is always a bad idea...
Im not derbrause start actually reading posts from other people! And the settings have nothing to do with how many Blocks are found. Just the Payout Distribution. Also i you had read the post you would see that our Luck right now is insane good so there is nothing to complain about. One of the nodes which ran in the alternating P2Pool Network switched this morning to our net. So there is only one P2Pool Network right now which is doing very good and has a fair Payout distribution which honors People that stay at least 24 Hours in P2Pool. Thats the P2Pool i wanted for Pandacoin and 60 Mh/s see this the same way Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...). And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
|
|
|
|
Kam800
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 01:56:22 PM |
|
Here's the thing man, i really don't pay much attention to estimates unless after 24 hrs of mining something is way off. like 900 coins in 24 hrs. if you do the math it doesn't make any sense no matter what you plug in or how far you move the decimal point. I had the same problem mining doges, people think because they are getting a decent payout that they are not getting screwed but if you switch a few times and find a good pool that's when you realize just how bad you got hosed. This kind of crap has to stop if crypo's are ever going to evolve. I wasn't trying to be a dick and binary clock is a good dude so who knows maybe its something with the server i dont know, I just go by what i'm putting in and what i'm getting out, if it's close than i'm cool but if it's obvious and painfully low then i get pissed. i think the only way to keep pools honest is to spread the word.
as far as that other panda coin i could care less, i mine every new coin for a few hours just to pile them up in case it takes off later. doesn't everybody?
Yep I agree with your first point, that sends well off. Your idea of a pool review sounds useful, though it does sound as if different people have different experiences with these pools. Have you checked your latency between the pools? Would be interesting if the ones that didn't work out so well had a higher latency than those that more accurately reflect your hash rate. As for your last point - I couldn't possibly argue, I am mining flippin' PANDA after all...
|
|
|
|
Kam800
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:03:01 PM |
|
But you are right, it's in vain to talk sense to the people. Believers are believers and stay believers. Facts are dismissed.
There may be believers out there, but some of us are just sitting on the fence. With popcorn.
|
|
|
|
splinterize
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:06:33 PM |
|
PANDACOIN now on coinmarketcap.com
THTS RIGHT BABY! TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOON
|
|
|
|
sevoque (OP)
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:06:57 PM |
|
PANDACOIN now on coinmarketcap.com
THTS RIGHT BABY! TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOON+1 gona gobble up vertcoin in no time
|
|
|
|
ozie
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:12:35 PM |
|
Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).
And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings. I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for. Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!! Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin. Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.
|
|
|
|
NetCrashGER
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:12:47 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
xblackdemonx
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:26:17 PM |
|
There may be believers out there, but some of us are just sitting on the fence. With popcorn.
i'm really just here for the money
|
|
|
|
blockjoe
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:27:14 PM |
|
Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).
And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings. I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for. Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!! Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin. Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues. Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?
|
|
|
|
splinterize
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:32:43 PM |
|
Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).
And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings. I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for. Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!! Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin. Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues. Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ?
|
|
|
|
blockjoe
Member
Offline
Activity: 115
Merit: 10
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:35:03 PM |
|
Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).
And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings. I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for. Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!! Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin. Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues. Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ? Indeed, No...
|
|
|
|
ozie
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:35:37 PM |
|
Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?
Have you ever seen a Panda raping an Dog? Nasty thing i tell you Guess we can observe this by our own in the future.
|
|
|
|
splinterize
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:36:47 PM |
|
Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).
And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings. I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for. Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!! Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin. Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues. Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ? Indeed, No... Nobody will know what will happen. And spamming that Panda will fail will not change it's fate. In case you dont remember, Doge, too, was being trolled heaviliy on the release. People where calling it Jokecoin, stating that it's investors and miners where stupid, that it was nothing more than a Ponzi Scheme and a Scam. And look where's it is now. It's a cycle. When a new coin become popular and start threatening other coins, their community become scared and spread FUD.
|
|
|
|
Kam800
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 59
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:39:51 PM |
|
sack up and allow PANDA you fuck
Saw this on the Cryptsy Panda thread. JohnZ, whoever you are, thanks for making my day
|
|
|
|
danetti
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 02:54:09 PM |
|
I have 3 280's. about 1 mhsh on cgminer. 5000 coins for 2 days @ 1 mhsh? that aint right man. I'm not trolling shit bro I know there are some others mining this trying to find the right pool. just throwing in my 2 cents.
OK that sounds pretty bad if it's true. My apologies if you aren't trolling - this thread has attracted a lot of negativity so expect some hostility if you're making unsubstantiated assertions. Back to the pools, I've had no probs with United-Miners. Sure the K/hs amounts and payout estimates are a bit off but hey, most pools I've found are the same. If you average out the highs and lows it does seem reasonable though. For example, although I've sold off my mining rigs I do a little mining with a single, paltry 7970 and I've been averaging around 14K coins/day at the current difficulty. Have you emailed support at the pools that weren't working for you? This stuff can be resolved pretty easily by any techy worth his bacon. Also, why on earth are you mining PND? You know that's a parody right? Have you actually sold any? Is it listed on any exchanges? C'mon bro, get a grip. (bit of a necro on this subject, sorry all) \ Here's the thing man, i really don't pay much attention to estimates unless after 24 hrs of mining something is way off. like 900 coins in 24 hrs. if you do the math it doesn't make any sense no matter what you plug in or how far you move the decimal point. I had the same problem mining doges, people think because they are getting a decent payout that they are not getting screwed but if you switch a few times and find a good pool that's when you realize just how bad you got hosed. This kind of crap has to stop if crypo's are ever going to evolve. I wasn't trying to be a dick and binary clock is a good dude so who knows maybe its something with the server i dont know, I just go by what i'm putting in and what i'm getting out, if it's close than i'm cool but if it's obvious and painfully low then i get pissed. i think the only way to keep pools honest is to spread the word. as far as that other panda coin i could care less, i mine every new coin for a few hours just to pile them up in case it takes off later. doesn't everybody? I think it's partly your fault for not checking and switching I check my estimates and confirms regularly, if something isn't right, fix it United-miner's estimates have been pretty good so far, the only problem with it and dedicated is that they get quite a bit of downtime from attacks Smaller pools usually are safer
|
|
|
|
iarsenaux
|
|
February 18, 2014, 03:13:08 PM |
|
anyone who have an idea how much panda/mh/day?
|
|
|
|
thejepper
|
|
February 18, 2014, 03:16:32 PM |
|
I have 3 280's. about 1 mhsh on cgminer. 5000 coins for 2 days @ 1 mhsh? that aint right man. I'm not trolling shit bro I know there are some others mining this trying to find the right pool. just throwing in my 2 cents.
i'm mining that on one gtx 760 on dedicated pool..
|
|
|
|
jox
|
|
February 18, 2014, 03:21:48 PM |
|
anyone who have an idea how much panda/mh/day?
1Mh/s~=67732PANDA/day at current difficulty
|
|
|
|
iarsenaux
|
|
February 18, 2014, 03:24:36 PM |
|
anyone who have an idea how much panda/mh/day?
1Mh/s~=67732PANDA/day at current difficulty thanks for the info.
|
|
|
|
GippoDudee
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
February 18, 2014, 03:26:07 PM |
|
why does the main coin page link to forechan? I don't want to invest in a coin run by a bunch of pedos and racists . . . Is this the kind of community we're supposed to be a part of ? Maybe I'll invest in Stablecoin instead, it's poised to make a comeback
|
|
|
|
|