Bitcoin Forum
November 05, 2024, 12:37:40 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 [153] 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 ... 290 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [pandacoin] The Panda Coin ♥ Scrypt Adaptive-N w/Kimotos Gravity Well ★  (Read 398945 times)
blockjoe
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 01:52:42 PM
 #3041

As it has been said before, derbrause. If you have kept the p2pool parameters available before, a lot of more blocks will be there. Splitting p2pool is always a bad idea...

Im not derbrause start actually reading posts from other people!

And the settings have nothing to do with how many Blocks are found. Just the Payout Distribution.
Also i you had read the post you would see that our Luck right now is insane good so there is nothing to complain about.

One of the nodes which ran in the alternating P2Pool Network switched this morning to our net. So there is only one P2Pool Network right now which is doing very good and has a fair Payout distribution which honors People that stay at least 24 Hours in P2Pool.

Thats the P2Pool i wanted for Pandacoin and 60 Mh/s see this the same way  Wink

Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.
Kam800
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 01:56:22 PM
 #3042


Here's the thing man, i really don't pay much attention to estimates unless after 24 hrs of mining something is way off. like 900 coins in 24 hrs. if you do the math it doesn't make any sense no matter what you plug in or how far you move the decimal point. I had the same problem mining doges, people think because they are getting a decent payout that they are not getting screwed but if you switch a few times and find a good pool that's when you realize just how bad you got hosed. This kind of crap has to stop if crypo's are ever going to evolve. I wasn't trying to be a dick and binary clock is a good dude so who knows maybe its something with the server i dont know, I just go by what i'm putting in and what i'm getting out, if it's close than i'm cool but if it's obvious and painfully low then i get pissed. i think the only way to keep pools honest is to spread the word.

as far as that other panda coin i could care less, i mine every new coin for a few hours just to pile them up in case it takes off later. doesn't everybody?

Yep I agree with your first point, that sends well off. Your idea of a pool review sounds useful, though it does sound as if different people have different experiences with these pools. Have you checked your latency between the pools? Would be interesting if the ones that didn't work out so well had a higher latency than those that more accurately reflect your hash rate.

As for your last point - I couldn't possibly argue, I am mining flippin' PANDA after all...
Kam800
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:03:01 PM
 #3043

But you are right, it's in vain to talk sense to the people. Believers are believers and stay believers. Facts are dismissed.

There may be believers out there, but some of us are just sitting on the fence. With popcorn.
splinterize
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:06:33 PM
 #3044

PANDACOIN now on coinmarketcap.com

THTS RIGHT BABY!


TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOON
sevoque (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:06:57 PM
 #3045

PANDACOIN now on coinmarketcap.com

THTS RIGHT BABY!


TO THE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOON

+1 gona gobble up vertcoin in no time
ozie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 103


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:12:35 PM
 #3046


Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.
NetCrashGER
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 10



View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:12:47 PM
 #3047

Is there a request to add it on cryptsy ?

https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/77258
xblackdemonx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 6
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:26:17 PM
 #3048

There may be believers out there, but some of us are just sitting on the fence. With popcorn.

i'm really just here for the money
blockjoe
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:27:14 PM
 #3049


Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.

Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?
splinterize
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:32:43 PM
 #3050


Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.

Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?



And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ?
blockjoe
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:35:03 PM
 #3051


Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.

Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?



And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ?


Indeed, No...
ozie
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 239
Merit: 103


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:35:37 PM
 #3052


Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?


Have you ever seen a Panda raping an Dog? Nasty thing i tell you  Grin

Guess we can observe this by our own in the future.
splinterize
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:36:47 PM
 #3053


Luck is not the issue here. To get a proper p2pool we need the good parameters and a lot of MH/s. VTC p2pool is above 200MH/s, and that's good. Anyway there is an issue here the share parameter window is too high here, that prevents us to do coins switching when the difficulty is updated. (*24 is too high, I think *4 is OK...).

And to get a lot of p2pool nodes we must avoid confusion.

Ahh now you tell the real issue you have with the settings.
I highly suggest you go with traditional Pool if you want to often switch Coins. Thats not the typical Scenario P2Pool was designed for.

Also the whole switch+mine+dump mentality makes me really sick. Im into cryto for profits too but not at all costs!!
Imho just look at VTC to see what this does to a very promising looking coin.

Anyways if you want to discuss this further join IRC #p2pool-panda or PM me, no reason to Spam the whole Thread with our P2Pool issues.

Traditional pool are worst for such an usage too. You will lost a lot of GPU power, dead on arrival may be very high. And most pools use now PPLNS, too avoid switch at the block level, here it makes senses, the block value is random like doge, mining a block close to 1 is worthless... Anyhow I don't think you expect this coin to be over doge in the long run. Don't you?



And i'm pretty sure that you never expected Doge to become that big, didnt you ?


Indeed, No...


Nobody will know what will happen. And spamming that Panda will fail will not change it's fate.


In case you dont remember, Doge, too, was being trolled heaviliy on the release. People where calling it Jokecoin, stating that it's investors and miners where stupid, that it was nothing more than a Ponzi Scheme and a Scam.


And look where's it is now.


It's a cycle. When a new coin become popular and start threatening other coins, their community become scared and spread FUD.
Kam800
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 59
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:39:51 PM
 #3054


Quote from: JohnZ link=https://cryptsy.freshdesk.com/support/discussions/topics/77258/page/14
sack up and allow PANDA you fuck

Saw this on the Cryptsy Panda thread. JohnZ, whoever you are, thanks for making my day Smiley
danetti
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 56
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 02:54:09 PM
 #3055

I have 3 280's. about 1 mhsh on cgminer. 5000 coins for 2 days @ 1 mhsh? that aint right man. I'm not trolling shit bro I know there are some others mining this trying to find the right pool. just throwing in my 2 cents.

OK that sounds pretty bad if it's true. My apologies if you aren't trolling - this thread has attracted a lot of negativity so expect some hostility if you're making unsubstantiated assertions.

Back to the pools, I've had no probs with United-Miners. Sure the K/hs amounts and payout estimates are a bit off but hey, most pools I've found are the same. If you average out the highs and lows it does seem reasonable though. For example, although I've sold off my mining rigs I do a little mining with a single, paltry 7970 and I've been averaging around 14K coins/day at the current difficulty.

Have you emailed support at the pools that weren't working for you? This stuff can be resolved pretty easily by any techy worth his bacon.

Also, why on earth are you mining PND? You know that's a parody right? Have you actually sold any? Is it listed on any exchanges?

C'mon bro, get a grip.

(bit of a necro on this subject, sorry all)
\

Here's the thing man, i really don't pay much attention to estimates unless after 24 hrs of mining something is way off. like 900 coins in 24 hrs. if you do the math it doesn't make any sense no matter what you plug in or how far you move the decimal point. I had the same problem mining doges, people think because they are getting a decent payout that they are not getting screwed but if you switch a few times and find a good pool that's when you realize just how bad you got hosed. This kind of crap has to stop if crypo's are ever going to evolve. I wasn't trying to be a dick and binary clock is a good dude so who knows maybe its something with the server i dont know, I just go by what i'm putting in and what i'm getting out, if it's close than i'm cool but if it's obvious and painfully low then i get pissed. i think the only way to keep pools honest is to spread the word.

as far as that other panda coin i could care less, i mine every new coin for a few hours just to pile them up in case it takes off later. doesn't everybody?
I think it's partly your fault for not checking and switching
I check my estimates and confirms regularly, if something isn't right, fix it
United-miner's estimates have been pretty good so far, the only problem with it and dedicated is that they get quite a bit of downtime from attacks
Smaller pools usually are safer
iarsenaux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 18, 2014, 03:13:08 PM
 #3056

anyone who have an idea how much panda/mh/day?
thejepper
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 03:16:32 PM
 #3057


I have 3 280's. about 1 mhsh on cgminer. 5000 coins for 2 days @ 1 mhsh? that aint right man. I'm not trolling shit bro I know there are some others mining this trying to find the right pool. just throwing in my 2 cents.

i'm mining that on one gtx 760 on dedicated pool..

jox
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 681
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 03:21:48 PM
 #3058

anyone who have an idea how much panda/mh/day?

1Mh/s~=67732PANDA/day at current difficulty
iarsenaux
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 18, 2014, 03:24:36 PM
 #3059

anyone who have an idea how much panda/mh/day?

1Mh/s~=67732PANDA/day at current difficulty

thanks for the info.
GippoDudee
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 18, 2014, 03:26:07 PM
 #3060

why does the main coin page link to forechan?
I don't want to invest in a coin run by a bunch of pedos and racists . . .   Undecided
Is this the kind of community we're supposed to be a part of ?

Maybe I'll invest in Stablecoin instead, it's poised to make a comeback
Pages: « 1 ... 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 [153] 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 ... 290 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!