What's the conclusion you're trying to make here? Is it that the distribution isn't that bad (only 45 ppl with at the highest level)? Is it that bitcoin has wealth distribution inequality?
Wealth distribution will always exist unless a government forces those with more to give to those with less until all people are equal. Is this your point?
Wealth inequality isn't a bad thing, it's what motivates people to work, it's what motivates people to compete, it's what motivates people to innovate, and it's what motivates people to give. Isn't it better that these things occur at each person's will, rather than by force?
i'm not aware of poor people that have done something significant and tangible in this era, inequality is good if the difference is negligeable and the poorer is not so poor
but when you get a big discrepancy among many people and only few of them are wealthy enough and the others are like houseless, you have not a good scenario at all
Certainly a valid point. The range of the inequality, how far between wealthiest and the poorest can be debated. And the propensity for the bell curve to be reversed where we have a high proportion at the low end of wealth and a high proportion at the high end is probably a better measure of how acceptable or unacceptable the inequality is...but the comfort to that spread will always be up for debate.
To your first comment, there's a lot of poor people that have done something tangible, something significant in this era. There are a lot of "rags to riches" stories. In a capitalist society the reward for doing something tangible or significant is wealth (in most cases...e.g., a social worker does great things but doesn't get paid much, so do many other fields). You can look a wealthy man today and find out where they started from and could find that they came from a very poor background with limited options and were able to work their way out of it.
And one thing that poor people could do that would be incredibly tangible would be to continue to share the inequality they feel in wealth distribution and how the options available to them may be unfair or out of reach.