Should we compensate bounty hunters when ICOs fail?

[stoat]

@mods: please ban every newbie account that posted in this spam thread.

[Kang Bahar]

Try to imagine. If your project fails, do you want to compensate hundreds of bounty participants in your project?
When your project failed, that means your coin/token will not have a value at all. And I think, the bounty participant won't accept your token.
Nah. If you are the project owner or as well as bounty manager, you are not required to compensate bounty participants when your project fail.

[passwordnow]

Don't use 'we' as if you are the bounty manager or developer of those ICOs. But basically, I'd say yes so those bounty hunters will be paid depending on how they worked and how much effort they exerted just to promote the project. There are other factors that must be considered, you just can't be sure of the project to become shady later on. The manager should always be meticulous on choosing what project to manage so his participants will be safe and prioritized.

[stoat]

Only the team maybe because they will not do anything to success their ICO.

WHAT THE FUCK DOES THAT EVEN MEAN YOU GODDAMN IGNORAMUS REPORTED FOR SPAM

[Aniwura]

The effort put ij by bounty hunters are not always easy and i do not even expecy that bounty hunters be treated with disdain, just like some would do and decide not to even pay despite the project's success.

[kotajikikox]

I think it's fair because a bounty person does his job and many people approach her very ostensibly offended when he is deceived

but how can pay bounty participant if the icos project are failed to the target in the market, and yes i understand bounty hunter is sacrifice
their time and effort to promote the project.

but he/she can get their bounty token or coin came from the failed project the question here when the tokens or ocins listing into the market become profitable.

[kicauklaten]

sure is a funny thing about this condition. If it can't reach their sales from where it will get the money to pay for the bounty hunter. certainly the team or bounty manager reluctant to pull out a huge cost to pay because even they don't get revenue. Indeed the hope for bounty hunter is paid for, but certainly, if there is certainly that is the team or manager that is generous.

[itasannah]

Of course, all ICOs must be able to compensate investors or Bounty participants if the ICO fails. It is not easy to work at the ICO because it takes a long time for ICO to complete it. But this compensation happened and it was very fair. But we as bounty hunters or investors must be more careful in carrying out ICO elections.

[motun01]

I think it is part of bounty hunting to actually promote the project. So a failure of the project to meets  its fundraising targets bounty hunters are made to feel the impact. However bounty hunters are human and deserve some sort of reward for the work that has been done

[jackflag]

I think that bounty hunters do not such a difficult job that they would be entitled to compensation. The most important thing to compensate all investments to investors is the key to the development of the industry.

[Christinebeauty]

If there is any means to compensate bounty hunters after failed projects it would be very good. Almost all the bounties I participated last year turned out to be unsuccessful and it was a great lost on my part. All my resources I wasted on those unsuccessful projects went waste

[reza7777]

how will they compensate bounty hunter? do you think if team wants to spend their money on bounty hunter of course not, so don't expect anything if ico fails

[sirohige]

when ico really fails and investor funds are returned, then for the bounty campaign there will be no compensation because ico is canceled and no funds are collected, because bounty campaign should be a good and good marketing strategy and can make ico successful but it turns out that the ico failed and can't even touch the softcap so the bounty can be canceled.

[nutildah]

Seeing as how many bounty hunters do the least amount of work possible when promoting an ICO, of course they should not be compensated. Using bounty hunters to promote ICOs is about one of the stupidest possible ways somebody can get publicity, seeing as how most of them

- write garbage forum posts
- have fake Facebook friends or fake Twitter followers
- copy and paste the homepage of an ICO and call it a "blog"
- game the system to get as many tokens as possible.

Then if the token should by the grace of God actually be worth something, they just dump all of their rewards on the market as soon as possible, crushing the chances of success of the project.

Bounty hunters are the dumpster divers of the crypto world. They sift through digital trash and call it a living instead of actually contributing anything to society. The sooner ICOs realize this and stop using them (or at least begin to put some quality control on them), the better.

[kendedes]

I think it's debate able, in one side the bounty hunter already done their work, but in the other side, there is some rules or perhaps unwritten rules that the project will be paying the bounty participant when certain amount of fund are collected, and by joining the campaign that means the bounty participant already agreeing that rules.

[grifinmch]

If you have worked long enough so at least there is compensation for the bounty hunter so that they can enjoy the results. However, it also may either Fund from which to pay their work is certainly no one knows. at least if there is any compensation will be able to create a bounty hunter could be alleviated through the result is not the maximum.

[Plecet Bank]

Compensation is indeed a good thing for those who suffer losses and lose time because the project failed. I think this can also be a good solution, but it is also very difficult to implement. Because the project failed, of course, everyone didn't get tokens.

[djuragan]

Perhaps its already mentioned before, but in my opinion would be there is no chance for bounty hunter to get paid if the project is failed.
I believe the team doesn't has that kind of allocation to give compensation if the project doesn't reach the desired target.

[giletto]

I think that bounty hunters do not such a difficult job that they would be entitled to compensation. The most important thing to compensate all investments to investors is the key to the development of the industry.

Bounty hunters must also be valued. If they don't value bounty hunters to pay for bounty, you'll never get anything here. In addition, if ICO fails, it is certain that investors and bounty hunters will not receive any token

[stoat]

Bounty spammers deserve death