Should we compensate bounty hunters when ICOs fail?

[adterna]

Yes they should be compensated for the time they spend, because with the services of the bounty hunters all ICOs can succeed, if the failed ICO does not compensate the bounty hunter who works, chances are they will no longer trust the ICO in the future, and that will make it difficult for certain projects to raise funds for ICO project funds.

[1715653695]

1715653695

[1715653695]

1715653695

[1715653695]

1715653695

[maydna]

I wonder how the devs or the teams can pay the bounty hunters if the ICO was failed? It's like you hire someone but the payment is not worth at all for them or for you. The bounty hunters will have a problem to sell the token because the token doesn't have any price and even the token is not listed on any exchange. The dev and the teams should find another way to pay the bounty hunters and perhaps, giving them eth or cash will be a good solution but I don't think that the dev will do this because they will keep the money for their own project.

[nutildah]

Yes they should be compensated for the time they spend, because with the services of the bounty hunters all ICOs can succeed, if the failed ICO does not compensate the bounty hunter who works, chances are they will no longer trust the ICO in the future, and that will make it difficult for certain projects to raise funds for ICO project funds.

Good, hopefully they'll retire and stop flooding the forum with garbage posts. A lot of bounty hunters are cheaters and the rest are lazy. It's not a real job. It's what you do when you don't have a job .

[Fluxtorrence9]

No that's not right,compensation is not needed because we all know the risk when joining a bounty campaign about softcap and hardcap ,if these two never works out they its no ones fault

[ottogary]

If that really is possible for a failed ICO to pay the bounty hunter after their hardwork, but sadly all this time there is nothing that bounty hunter get after what they done if the ICO is not reach the target. even sometime when a project reach the target, then on one side, the project asking something uneasy for bounty hunter to do in order to claim their reward.

[axel2078]

Yes they should be compensated for the time they spend, because with the services of the bounty hunters all ICOs can succeed, if the failed ICO does not compensate the bounty hunter who works, chances are they will no longer trust the ICO in the future, and that will make it difficult for certain projects to raise funds for ICO project funds.

Bounty only succeeds when their ICO project succeeds. You can't ask for anything more from them, How can you get money when they don't have money to pay you. There are hundreds of ICOs every month so the number of failures over 90% is normal

[amaterazu]

So far what happened when the project failed, for all Bounty participants certainly did not get tokens. So if there is compensation for bounty hunters, of course, that can't. If the project fails, nothing can be expected anymore. And this is very important to do research before joining the ICO project.

[attech21]

If I ask for something that should only be paid for by bounty hunters even if not ico is a successful project because
They suffered from sacrifice and hardworks time for it. whereas in reality unsuccessful ico no pay on bounty hunter this is very unfair because it works well and does not pay. so before joining a project make sure that it is true and legit or something ico has already achieved so you do not have to worry.

[Jadesola]

I think the dev should be made to pay bounty hunters and also refund investors money if project fail,this will make them to be more serious and this will also help us to have genuine project coming up instead of having scam project all over.

[Quintrix]

It is a common thing to see most ICOs stating in their whitepaper that the monies of investors will be refunded to them in case the ICO is not able to reach its softcap. Sadly bounty hunters work for like eight weeks or even more and their efforts go waste. Do you agree they should also be compensated?

They should be compensated but do they have the money to do this, based on my observation these ICO started without money at all and only these crowdfunding can realize all that they are planning to do, including paying bounty hunters.

[macshad]

Rather than agreeing with that I think there must be some agreement before bounty starts so everyone should know what is going to happen to themselves if ico is not success.

Most ICO makes it clear they won't pay bounty hunters if the project doesn't reach the soft cap or so....... So the project doesn't reach a certain amount of money bounty hunters should not be excepting to get paid because the Main goal of bounty hunters are to create awareness for the particular project

[ballerin and giroud]

It is a common thing to see most ICOs stating in their whitepaper that the monies of investors will be refunded to them in case the ICO is not able to reach its softcap. Sadly bounty hunters work for like eight weeks or even more and their efforts go waste. Do you agree they should also be compensated?

If the title is work, each team should compensate the bounty hunter. So if they do not provide the slightest compensation what should be done by the bounty hunter is to block all activities that will be carried out by the team, especially when they create a new ICO project. If their attitude is just left alone, I think this forum must make a hard rule for every manager's bounty when he gets a project to promote. I think this is fair and wise for several parties.

[Amalker]

It is a common thing to see most ICOs stating in their whitepaper that the monies of investors will be refunded to them in case the ICO is not able to reach its softcap. Sadly bounty hunters work for like eight weeks or even more and their efforts go waste. Do you agree they should also be compensated?

Yes, it will be fair to compensate the time, which bounty hunter spent on anyone project. And even better will be if they paid hunters in BTC/ETH weekly.

[Snaic]

It is a common thing to see most ICOs stating in their whitepaper that the monies of investors will be refunded to them in case the ICO is not able to reach its softcap. Sadly bounty hunters work for like eight weeks or even more and their efforts go waste. Do you agree they should also be compensated?

There is a certain amount of logic in this statement. If the ICO team would turn to a commercial enterprise to provide services for advertising their ICO project, they would be forced to pay for these services, regardless of whether the ICO project is successful or not. The activities of the ICO are practically not regulated for the time being, and therefore the ICO teams so far dictate their conditions for joining their projects. If the activities of the ICO will be regulated by government agencies, then this issue should be taken into account.
For example, in the regulatory act for regulating the activities of ICO, which is prepared in Russia, the ICO team must have a significant amount of funds in a bank account before holding an ICO and this amount can cover the running costs of the ICO project even in case of its failure.

[Augustyusuf]

i think its only wasting a time doing bounty if that project itself was failed, but we dont know if some project will fail or succes, so keep happy bounting guys.

[fortunecrypto]

It is a common thing to see most ICOs stating in their whitepaper that the monies of investors will be refunded to them in case the ICO is not able to reach its softcap. Sadly bounty hunters work for like eight weeks or even more and their efforts go waste. Do you agree they should also be compensated?

We should all be compensated but all these ICO only have their tokens and their promise to rely on, we participated on these ICO based on their promise and agreement, they sum up our rewards based on their token value as they compute it to be, but when it did not materialized, we cannot do anything about it.

[Ulumorzki]

As a bounty hunter, it is fair if they will paid us for our work eventhough it will last for just a few weeks. But to think that the project is failed to launch and there is no funds to be raised then where the team will get the funds to be distributed to their participants?. It is better to check and make sure that the project you'll be joining to has raised their softcap so that you'll be sure to get paid.

[jademaxxiss012]

In my opinion it should be Yes, because that is considered as work and not just an incentives. The work must be paid and not just being promised. This is why many people nowadays conduct ICO project even if it will going to fail because they do will not going to have huge loses on it for they do not have that resources or money invested to start the ICO period. If only the forum would be strict to ask for requirements and for compliance to start an ICO project then it would be good for the investors and for the bounty hunters.

[debby070]

Most bounty campaign make it clear that bounties will only be paid when a certain amount of money is raised. With such caution, I don't think any compensation should be paid to them.

In this case, it is still good to be grateful to the people who helped the bounty even that the project is not successful. Just a little amount might do well. just a compensation for their hardfork and contribution to the project.

[elite070]

It is a common thing to see most ICOs stating in their whitepaper that the monies of investors will be refunded to them in case the ICO is not able to reach its softcap. Sadly bounty hunters work for like eight weeks or even more and their efforts go waste. Do you agree they should also be compensated?

No, I guess not, the ICO team invested too much of their hardwork for the project and compensating the bounty hunters might be not a good idea to do since they do not completed the ICO in a successful way. Maybe they might provide a little compensation but not the actual bounty pool allocation.